Literature DB >> 22124683

Endocardial and epicardial myocardial perfusion determined by semi-quantitative and quantitative myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance.

Abdulghani Larghat1, John Biglands, Neil Maredia, John P Greenwood, Stephen G Ball, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Aleksandra Radjenovic, Sven Plein.   

Abstract

This study aims to quantify subendocardial and subepicardial myocardial blood flow (MBF) from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and to compare semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis methods. 17 healthy volunteers (9 males, mean age 34 ± 8) were scanned during adenosine stress and at rest. A "semi-quantitative" myocardial perfusion index (MPI) was calculated based on maximal upslopes of signal intensity-time profiles for a mid-ventricular myocardial slice. In addition, absolute MBF (ml/g/min) was estimated using Fermi-constrained deconvolution. On semi-quantitative analysis, the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial MPI was 0.98 ± 0.1 at stress and 1.16 ± 0.09 at rest, P < 0.0001. The MPRI (i.e. the ratio of stress over rest MPI) for the subendocardium was 1.54 ± 0.3 versus 1.81 ± 0.35 for the subepicardium, P = 0.03. For quantitative analysis, the ratio of subendocardial to subepicardial MBF was 0.91 ± 0.11 at stress versus 1.17 ± 0.16 at rest, P < 0.0001. The subendocardial MBF reserve was also lower than in the subepicardium (2.6 ± 0.75 vs. 3.32 ± 0.93, P = 0.027). In conclusion, semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI shows higher subendocardial blood flow at rest and reduced subendocardial perfusion reserve compared to the subepicardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22124683     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9982-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Juerg Schwitter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Effect of NO on transmural distribution of blood flow in hypertrophied left ventricle during exercise.

Authors:  D J Duncker; J H Traverse; Y Ishibashi; R J Bache
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-04

4.  Regional timing of myocardial shortening is related to prestretch from atrial contraction: assessment by high temporal resolution MRI tagging in humans.

Authors:  J J M Zwanenburg; M J W Götte; J P A Kuijer; M B M Hofman; P Knaapen; R M Heethaar; A C van Rossum; J T Marcus
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Quantification of MRI measured myocardial perfusion reserve in healthy humans: a comparison with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Thomas Fritz-Hansen; Jens D Hove; Klaus F Kofoed; Henning Kelbaek; Henrik B W Larsson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise.

Authors:  Dirk J Duncker; Robert J Bache
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Regional heterogeneity of myocardial perfusion in healthy human myocardium: assessment with magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Olaf M Muehling; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Prasad Panse; Andrey Zenovich; Betsy V Wilson; Robert F Wilson; Norbert Wilke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan R Panting; Peter D Gatehouse; Guang-Zhong Yang; Frank Grothues; David N Firmin; Peter Collins; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Effect of treadmill exercise on transmural distribution of blood flow in hypertrophied left ventricle.

Authors:  D J Duncker; Y Ishibashi; R J Bache
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1998-10

Review 10.  Myocardial first-pass perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance: history, theory, and current state of the art.

Authors:  Bernhard L Gerber; Subha V Raman; Krishna Nayak; Frederick H Epstein; Pedro Ferreira; Leon Axel; Dara L Kraitchman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  9 in total

1.  3.0 T magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for semi-quantitative evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Liang Yin; Hai-Yan Xu; Sui-Sheng Zheng; Ying Zhu; Jiang-Xi Xiao; Wei Zhou; Si-Si Yu; Liang-Geng Gong
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Influence of the cardiac cycle on time-intensity curves using multislice dynamic magnetic resonance perfusion.

Authors:  Alain Nchimi; Isabelle Mancini; Thomas K Y Broussaud
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for myocardial perfusion and diastolic function-reference control values for women.

Authors:  May Bakir; Janet Wei; Michael D Nelson; Puja K Mehta; Afsaneh Haftbaradaran; Erika Jones; Edward Gill; Behzad Sharif; Piotr J Slomka; Debiao Li; Chrisandra L Shufelt; Margo Minissian; Daniel S Berman; C Noel Bairey Merz; Louise E J Thomson
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-02

4.  Transmural myocardial perfusion gradients in relation to coronary artery stenoses severity assessed by cardiac multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Jesper James Linde; Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Jens Dahlgaard Hove; Mathias Sørgaard; Henning Kelbæk; Walter Bjørn Nielsen; Klaus Fuglsang Kofoed
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Cardiac MRI assessment of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Yasmin S Hamirani; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2014-05

6.  Interstudy repeatability of self-gated quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Devavrat Likhite; Promporn Suksaranjit; Ganesh Adluru; Nan Hu; Cindy Weng; Eugene Kholmovski; Chris McGann; Brent Wilson; Edward DiBella
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Quantitative 3D myocardial perfusion with an efficient arterial input function.

Authors:  Jason Kraig Mendes; Ganesh Adluru; Devavrat Likhite; Merlin J Fair; Peter D Gatehouse; Ye Tian; Apoorva Pedgaonkar; Brent Wilson; Edward V R DiBella
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging used for Evaluation of Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell Therapy in Patients with Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease.

Authors:  Abbas Ali Qayyum; Anders Bruun Mathiasen; Naja Dam Mygind; Niels Groove Vejlstrup; Jens Kastrup
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Mechanistic study of the effect of Endothelin SNPs in microvascular angina - Protocol of the PRIZE Endothelin Sub-Study.

Authors:  George R Abraham; Andrew J Morrow; Joana Oliveira; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Emma E Davenport; Colin Berry; Anthony P Davenport; Stephen P Hoole
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-02-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.