Literature DB >> 26661637

The effect of metal density in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Paul R P Rushton1, Mahmoud Elmalky2, Agnivesh Tikoo3, Saumyajit Basu3, Ashley A Cole4, Michael P Grevitt5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Determine impact of metal density on curve correction and costs in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Ascertain if increased metal density is required for larger or stiffer curves.
METHODS: Multicentre retrospective case series of patients with Lenke 1-2 AIS treated with single-stage posterior only surgery using a standardized surgical technique; constructs using >80 % screws with variable metal density. All cases had >2-year follow up. Outcomes measures included coronal and sagittal radiographic outcomes, metal density (number of instrumented pedicles vs total available), fusion length and cost.
RESULTS: 106 cases included 94 female. 78 Lenke 1. Mean age 14 years (9-26). Mean main thoracic (MT) Cobb angle 63° corrected to 22° (66 %). No significant correlations were present between metal density and: (a) coronal curve correction rates of the MT (r = 0.13, p = 0.19); (b) lumbar curve frontal correction (r = -0.15, p = 0.12); (c) correction index in MT curve (r = -0.10, p = 0.32); and (d) correction index in lumbar curve (r = 0.11, p = 0.28). Metal density was not correlated with change in thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.22, p = 0.04) or lumbosacral lordosis (r = 0.27, p = 0.01). Longer fusions were associated with greater loss of thoracic kyphosis (r = -0.31, p = 0.003). Groups differing by preoperative curve size and stiffness had comparable corrections with similar metal density. The pedicle screw cost represented 21-29 % of overall cost of inpatient treatment depending on metal density.
CONCLUSIONS: Metal density affects cost but not the coronal and sagittal correction of thoracic AIS. Neither larger nor stiffer curves necessitate high metal density.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Cost analysis; Metal density; Outcomes; Pedicle screws

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26661637     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4335-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  The effect of differing spinal fusion instrumentation on the occurrence of postoperative crankshaft phenomenon in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Fenghua Tao; Yingchuan Zhao; Yungang Wu; Yang Xie; Ming Li; Yanghu Lu; Feng Pan; Fengjin Guo; Feng Li
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-12

2.  Coronal and sagittal plane correction in patients with Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of consecutive versus interval pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ming Li; Yu Shen; Xiutong Fang; Jianqiang Ni; Suxi Gu; Xiaodong Zhu; Zhiyu Zhang
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-06

3.  Fixation points within the main thoracic curve: does more instrumentation produce greater curve correction and improved results?

Authors:  James O Sanders; Mohammad Diab; Stephens B Richards; Lawrence G Lenke; Charles E Johnston; John B Emans; Daniel J Sucato; Mark A Erickson; Keith H Bridwell; Richard E McCarthy; John F Sarwark; John P Dormans
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Right adolescent idiopathic thoracic curve (Lenke 1 A and B): does cost of instrumentation and implant density improve radiographic and cosmetic parameters?

Authors:  Scott Yang; Sean M Jones-Quaidoo; Matthew Eager; Justin W Griffin; Vasantha Reddi; Wendy Novicoff; Jeffrey Shilt; Ernesto Bersusky; Helton Defino; Jean Ouellet; Vincent Arlet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Skipped versus consecutive pedicle screw constructs for correction of Lenke 1 curves.

Authors:  Simon Morr; Alexandra Carrer; Luis Ignacio Alvarez-García de Quesada; Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Olaverri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Hospital cost analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery in 125 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jonathan R Kamerlink; Martin Quirno; Joshua D Auerbach; Andrew H Milby; Lynne Windsor; Laura Dean; Joseph W Dryer; Thomas J Errico; Baron S Lonner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Optimal surgical care for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an international consensus.

Authors:  Marinus de Kleuver; Stephen J Lewis; Niccole M Germscheid; Steven J Kamper; Ahmet Alanay; Sigurd H Berven; Kenneth M Cheung; Manabu Ito; Lawrence G Lenke; David W Polly; Yong Qiu; Maurits van Tulder; Christopher Shaffrey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Dorsal instrumentation for idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis: rod rotation versus translation.

Authors:  M Muschik; D Schlenzka; P N Robinson; C Kupferschmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A pedicle screw construct gives an enhanced posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis when compared with other constructs: myth or reality.

Authors:  Vagmin Vora; Alvin Crawford; Nadir Babekhir; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Lawrence Lenke; Melissa Peskin; Gina Charles; Yongjung Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Minimal important differences of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire following surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Juan Bagó; Francisco J S Pérez-Grueso; Esther Les; Pablo Hernández; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  8 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using high-density pedicle screw constructs: Is 5-year routine visit required?

Authors:  Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Rodrigo Remondino; J Joncas; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Melatonin regulates CRE-dependent gene transcription underlying osteoblast proliferation by activating Src and PKA in parallel.

Authors:  Lin Tao; Yue Zhu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Cost analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: early discharge decreases hospital costs much less than intraoperative variables under the control of the surgeon.

Authors:  Brandon L Raudenbush; David P Gurd; Ryan C Goodwin; Thomas E Kuivila; R Tracy Ballock
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-03

4.  The implant density does not change the correction rate of the main and the accompanying curves: A comparison between consecutive and intermittent pedicle screw constructs.

Authors:  Alpaslan Şenköylü; Mehmet Çetinkaya; İsmail Daldal; Ali Eren; Erdem Aktaş
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.511

5.  Hi-PoAD technique for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adult: Personal case series.

Authors:  Cesare Faldini; Francesca Barile; Fabrizio Perna; Stefano Pasini; Michele Fiore; Giovanni Viroli; Alberto Di Martino; Alberto Ruffilli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Impact of metal density on deformity correction in posterior fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Irfan Qadir; Abdullah Shah; Syed Roman Alam; Haseeb Hussain; Rizwan Akram; Amer Aziz
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-03-10

7.  The correlations between the anchor density and the curve correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Yeh; Chi-Chien Niu; Lih-Huei Chen; Wen-Jer Chen; Po-Liang Lai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Implant Distribution Versus Implant Density in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Does the Position of the Screw Matter?

Authors:  Brian L Dial; Valentine R Esposito; Anthony A Catanzano; Robert D Fitch; Robert K Lark
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.