STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of the crankshaft phenomenon in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent hybrid, consecutive pedicle screw or interval pedicle screw instrumentation for posterior spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Scoliosis may progress after posterior spinal fusion in skeletally immature patients with AIS. The crankshaft phenomenon occurs when the anterior column continues to grow in the face of posterior fusion causing characteristic twisting of the fused segment. The optimal surgical method for preventing the occurrence of this complication has not been determined. METHODS: Sixty seven patients with AIS who underwent posterior fusion over a 6-year period were divided into groups according to fixation method: hybrid instrumentation, interval pedicle screw placement, or consecutive pedicle screw placement. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up radiographic measures, including Cobb angle, apical vertebral rotation (AVR), apical vertebral transposition (AVT), rib vertebral angle difference (RVAD) and trunk shift (TS) were assessed. The occurrence of the crankshaft phenomenon was determined. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 36 months. There were no between-the-group differences in demographics or preoperative or immediate postoperative measures. At the last follow-up, significant differences among the groups were apparent for Cobb angle, AVR, AVT, RVAD, and TS (all P<0.05). Cobb angle, AVR, AVT, RVAD, and TS significantly increased between the postsurgery and the last follow-up in the hybrid instrumentation group (all P<0.0167). Only TS increased significantly in the 2 other groups. There were 7 cases of crankshaft phenomenon occurrence in the hybrid instrumentation group (33%), but none in the other 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in skeletally immature patients with AIS, hybrid instrumentation cannot effectively prevent occurrence of the crankshaft phenomenon, whereas interval and consecutive pedicle screw instrumentation may be more (and equally) efficacious in this regard.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: To compare the occurrence of the crankshaft phenomenon in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who underwent hybrid, consecutive pedicle screw or interval pedicle screw instrumentation for posterior spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Scoliosis may progress after posterior spinal fusion in skeletally immature patients with AIS. The crankshaft phenomenon occurs when the anterior column continues to grow in the face of posterior fusion causing characteristic twisting of the fused segment. The optimal surgical method for preventing the occurrence of this complication has not been determined. METHODS: Sixty seven patients with AIS who underwent posterior fusion over a 6-year period were divided into groups according to fixation method: hybrid instrumentation, interval pedicle screw placement, or consecutive pedicle screw placement. Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up radiographic measures, including Cobb angle, apical vertebral rotation (AVR), apical vertebral transposition (AVT), rib vertebral angle difference (RVAD) and trunk shift (TS) were assessed. The occurrence of the crankshaft phenomenon was determined. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 36 months. There were no between-the-group differences in demographics or preoperative or immediate postoperative measures. At the last follow-up, significant differences among the groups were apparent for Cobb angle, AVR, AVT, RVAD, and TS (all P<0.05). Cobb angle, AVR, AVT, RVAD, and TS significantly increased between the postsurgery and the last follow-up in the hybrid instrumentation group (all P<0.0167). Only TS increased significantly in the 2 other groups. There were 7 cases of crankshaft phenomenon occurrence in the hybrid instrumentation group (33%), but none in the other 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that in skeletally immature patients with AIS, hybrid instrumentation cannot effectively prevent occurrence of the crankshaft phenomenon, whereas interval and consecutive pedicle screw instrumentation may be more (and equally) efficacious in this regard.
Authors: Arun R Hariharan; Suken A Shah; Paul D Sponseller; Burt Yaszay; Michael P Glotzbecker; George H Thompson; Patrick J Cahill; Tracey P Bastrom Journal: Spine Deform Date: 2022-09-26
Authors: Paul R P Rushton; Mahmoud Elmalky; Agnivesh Tikoo; Saumyajit Basu; Ashley A Cole; Michael P Grevitt Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Vidyadhar V Upasani; Daniel J Hedequist; M Timothy Hresko; Lawrence I Karlin; John B Emans; Michael P Glotzbecker Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 1.548
Authors: Oliver O Tannous; Kelly E Banagan; Eric J Belin; Ehsan Jazini; Tristan B Weir; Steven C Ludwig; Daniel E Gelb Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2017-10-05