Literature DB >> 10333147

Dorsal instrumentation for idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis: rod rotation versus translation.

M Muschik1, D Schlenzka, P N Robinson, C Kupferschmidt.   

Abstract

The radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications among two groups of adolescent patients treated for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis with dorsal instrumentation using a unified implantation system (Universal Spinal System) were compared retrospectively. A total of 69 patients were included in the study. In 30 patients an intraoperative correction of the scoliosis was performed by translation and segmental correction (translation group, Helsinki). In 39 patients the correction was achieved according to the Cotrel-Dubousset rod rotation maneuver (rod rotation group, Berlin). The goal of the present study is to investigate whether one of the operative procedures leads to a better correction of idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis than the other. The mean follow-up interval was 30 months, with a minimum of 12 months. There were no significant preoperative differences in age (15+/-2 years in both groups), gender, or type of scoliosis (King types 2, 3, and 4). The preoperative radiographic measurements showed no significant differences between the two groups. In both patient groups, the thoracic primary curve, the lumbar secondary curve and the thoracic apical rotation were improved by the operation. Lumbar apical rotation and the sagittal profile were unchanged in both groups. The thoracic primary curve was corrected from 50 degrees +/-6 degrees to 24 degrees +/-7 degrees in the translation group and from 54 degrees +/-11 degrees to 220 degrees +/-11 degrees in the rod rotation group. The extent of the correction of the thoracic curve was significantly greater in the rod rotation group than in the translation group (59% vs. 52% correction). In contrast, the translation procedure seems to have a more beneficial effect on spinal balance than rod rotation. Neurological complications did not occur. In both patient groups an increase in the non-instrumented lumbar curve was noted, in two cases each. In three patients from the rod rotation group the instrumentation had to be removed due to a late infection with negative microbiological results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10333147      PMCID: PMC3611152          DOI: 10.1007/s005860050136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

1.  Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans.

Authors:  S H Tan; E C Teo; H C Chua
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.

Authors:  Wilbert van Laar; Rinse J Meester; Theo H Smit; Barend J van Royen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Indications for deformity correction with minimally invasive spondylodesis].

Authors:  C Wimmer; T Pfandlsteiner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Operative treatment of scoliosis : Preoperative planning, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative management].

Authors:  C Wimmer; A E Siam; T Pfandlsteiner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Spinal loop rectangle and sub laminar wiring as a technique for scoliosis correction.

Authors:  Shekhar Y Bhojraj; Raghuprasad G Varma; Abhay M Nene; Sheetal Mohite
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 6.  Do vertebral derotation techniques offer better outcomes compared to traditional methods in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Paul R P Rushton; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Long-term clinical and radiographic results of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Norbert Boos; Lori A Dolan; Stuart L Weinstein
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2007

8.  The effect of metal density in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Paul R P Rushton; Mahmoud Elmalky; Agnivesh Tikoo; Saumyajit Basu; Ashley A Cole; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Implant removal for late-developing infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis: reinstrumentation reduces loss of correction. A retrospective analysis of 45 cases.

Authors:  Michael Muschik; Wiebke Lück; Dietrich Schlenzka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Use of the Universal Clamp in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis for deformity correction and as an adjunct to fusion: 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jérôme Sale de Gauzy; Jean-Luc Jouve; Franck Accadbled; Benjamin Blondel; Gérard Bollini
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.