Literature DB >> 30741338

Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using high-density pedicle screw constructs: Is 5-year routine visit required?

Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong1,2,3, Rodrigo Remondino4, J Joncas5, Stefan Parent6,5,7, Hubert Labelle6,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to determine whether routine follow-up 5 years after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery is likely to affect postoperative care for patients treated with high-density pedicle screw constructs, when routine 2-year follow-up has been performed.
METHODS: We reviewed 80 patients undergoing surgery for AIS using high-density pedicle screw constructs and followed routinely 2 and 5 years after surgery. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the SRS-30 outcome questionnaire. Reoperations occurring between 2 and 5 years after surgery were identified.
RESULTS: Curve correction and QOL were similar between 2- and 5-year visits. Two patients required revision surgery after presenting during unplanned visits between the 2- and 5-year follow-ups. One patient presented at the routine 5-year visit with an asymptomatic undisplaced rod fracture without loss of correction, and it was decided to follow-up only as needed.
CONCLUSIONS: In AIS patients for whom routine follow-up 2 years after surgery using high-density pedicle screw constructs was uneventful, additional routine 5-year follow-up is not likely to affect postoperative care and revision rate. Patients developing complications and needing reoperation between 2 and 5 years after surgery will most likely present during unplanned visits rather than during routine follow-up appointments. Easy access to emergent visits on an as-needed basis is therefore important for this population if routine 5-year follow-up is not planned. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Quality of life; Scoliosis; Spinal deformity; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30741338     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-05887-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  15 in total

1.  Coronal and sagittal plane correction in patients with Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of consecutive versus interval pedicle screw placement.

Authors:  Ming Li; Yu Shen; Xiutong Fang; Jianqiang Ni; Suxi Gu; Xiaodong Zhu; Zhiyu Zhang
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-06

2.  Fixation points within the main thoracic curve: does more instrumentation produce greater curve correction and improved results?

Authors:  James O Sanders; Mohammad Diab; Stephens B Richards; Lawrence G Lenke; Charles E Johnston; John B Emans; Daniel J Sucato; Mark A Erickson; Keith H Bridwell; Richard E McCarthy; John F Sarwark; John P Dormans
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Five-year clinical and radiographic outcomes using pedicle screw only constructs in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Amer F Samdani; Michelle Marks; Tracy Bastrom; Hitesh Garg; Baron Lonner; James T Bennett; Joshua Pahys; Suken Shah; Firoz Miyanji; Harry Shufflebarger; Peter Newton; Randal Betz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Mid- to long-term outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marios G Lykissas; Viral V Jain; Senthil T Nathan; Varun Pawar; Emily A Eismann; Peter F Sturm; Alvin H Crawford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Correction of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using pedicle screw instrumentation: does higher implant density improve correction?

Authors:  Gerald M Y Quan; Mike J Gibson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Do anchor density or pedicle screw density correlate with short-term outcome measures in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?

Authors:  Sandra Gebhart; Timothy B Alton; Viviana Bompadre; Walter F Krengel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Low-density versus high-density thoracic pedicle screw constructs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: do more screws lead to a better outcome?

Authors:  Neil J Bharucha; Baron S Lonner; Joshua D Auerbach; Kristin E Kean; Per D Trobisch
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Does higher anchor density result in increased curve correction and improved clinical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  A Noelle Larson; David W Polly; Beverly Diamond; Charles Ledonio; B Stephens Richards; John B Emans; Daniel J Sucato; Charles E Johnston
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Surgical revision rates of hooks versus hybrid versus screws versus combined anteroposterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Benjamin K Potter; Lawrence G Lenke; David W Polly; Brenda Sides; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Correlation of scoliosis curve correction with the number and type of fixation anchors.

Authors:  David H Clements; Randal R Betz; Peter O Newton; Michael Rohmiller; Michelle C Marks; Tracey Bastrom
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis for the impact of rod materials and sizes in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Dawn Bowden; Annalisa Michielli; Michelle Merrill; Steven Will
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  A 43-Year Follow-Up of Unilateral Harrington Rod Instrumentation and Limited Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Jordan Vokes; Emmanuel Menga; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-04-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.