Literature DB >> 26657574

Which sample tube should be used for routine glucose determination?

Graziella Bonetti1, Vanessa Cancelli2, Giulio Coccoli2, Giorgio Piccinelli2, Duilio Brugnoni2, Luigi Caimi3, Mariarosa Carta4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glucose is one of the most frequently requested analytes in clinical laboratory. Blood glucose analysis is affected from in vitro glycolysis. In order to determine the most suitable blood collection tube for this purpose we have compared different tubes: sodium fluoride, lithium heparin, sodium fluoride/citrate buffer containing tubes and serum with clot activator tube for the measurement of glucose when the tube has been kept at room temperature (RT) for up to 4h.
METHODS: Venous blood was collected from 49 healthy volunteers into Sarstedt S-Monovettes for glucose analysis. Reference plasma glucose was determined in a lithium heparin tube and immediately placed in an ice/water slurry. Within 10min it was centrifuged at 4°C and plasma was separated from the blood cells. Samples have been preserved at RT for 1, 2 and 4h after drawing. Glucose has been determined using a hexokinase method.
RESULTS: Glucose levels tested in a serum with clot activator tube, in lithium heparin and in sodium fluoride/sodium EDTA tubes when compared with lithium-heparin reference plasma did not meet the desirable bias for glucose (±1.8%) when kept at RT for up to 4h. GlucoEXACT tubes, when corrected by the Sarsted recommended factor of 1.16, showed a mean (95% CI) bias of +0.96% (0.45-1.47) at 1h, +1.40% (0.88-1.93) at 2h and +0.95% (0.44-1.46) at 4h, reaching the analytical goal for the desirable bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Samples collected into GlucoEXACT tubes containing sodium fluoride/citrate buffer liquid mixture are equivalent to those collected in reference plasma tubes avoiding glycolysis completely and within a 4h delay in plasma separation.
Copyright © 2015 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Citrate acidification; Glucose; Glycolysis inhibition; Hexokinase; Preanalytical conditions; Sodium fluoride; Stability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26657574     DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes        ISSN: 1878-0210            Impact factor:   2.459


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Abnormal laboratory results : Plausibility, reliability, and implications].

Authors:  K J Lackner; S M Schellong
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Alternative pre-analytic sample handling techniques for glucose measurement in the absence of fluoride tubes in low resource settings.

Authors:  Wisdom P Nakanga; Priscilla Balungi; Anxious J Niwaha; Beverly M Shields; Peter Hughes; Rob C Andrews; Tim J Mc Donald; Moffat J Nyirenda; Andrew T Hattersley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Glucose meters: What's the laboratory reference glucose?

Authors:  Mariarosa Carta; Davide Giavarina; Andreina Paternoster; Graziella Bonetti
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The new Greiner FC-Mix tubes equal the old Terumo ones and are useful as glucose stabilizer after prolonged storage of samples.

Authors:  Graziella Bonetti; Mariarosa Carta
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.313

Review 5.  Deviating glucose results in an international dual-center study. A root cause investigation.

Authors:  Janne Cadamuro; Peter Bergsten; Katharina Mörwald; Anders Forslund; Marie Dahlbom; Jonas Bergquist; Iris Ciba; Susanne M Brunner; Jeanne Jabbour; Daniel Weghuber
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.