Literature DB >> 29387896

[Abnormal laboratory results : Plausibility, reliability, and implications].

K J Lackner1, S M Schellong2.   

Abstract

In outpatient care or the emergency room laboratory tests oftentimes provide the first clues to the medical condition that made the patient seek medical help. Quite commonly, rapid medical decisions are required in these situations. Therefore, laboratory results must be evaluated immediately and interpreted within the broader context of the patient's presentation. During this process test results must be checked for plausibility, their positive and/or negative predictive values for the individual patient must be considered, and finally, the potential clinical implications need to be assessed. The latter in particular is of the utmost importance. This article discusses several laboratory tests commonly ordered for emergency patients and provides some guidance on their relevance in the decision to refer an outpatient to an emergency room or for inpatient care, or whether a patient can be safely diagnosed in the outpatient setting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood cell count; Blood coagulation tests; Chemistry, clinical; Emergencies; Predictive value

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29387896     DOI: 10.1007/s00108-018-0384-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Internist (Berl)        ISSN: 0020-9554            Impact factor:   0.743


  12 in total

Review 1.  Errors in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Pierangelo Bonini; Mario Plebani; Ferruccio Ceriotti; Francesca Rubboli
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Quality standards for sample processing, transportation, and storage in hemostasis testing.

Authors:  Dorothy M Adcock Funk; Giuseppe Lippi; Emmanuel J Favaloro
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.180

Review 3.  Effectiveness of barcoding for reducing patient specimen and laboratory testing identification errors: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Susan R Snyder; Alessandra M Favoretto; James H Derzon; Robert H Christenson; Stephen E Kahn; Colleen S Shaw; Rich Ann Baetz; Diana Mass; Corinne R Fantz; Stephen S Raab; Milenko J Tanasijevic; Edward B Liebow
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.281

4.  Negative interference in cardiac troponin I immunoassays by circulating troponin autoantibodies.

Authors:  Susann Eriksson; Heidi Halenius; Kari Pulkki; Jukka Hellman; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 8.327

5.  Clinical utility of likelihood ratios.

Authors:  E J Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 6.  How to approach thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Roberto Stasi
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2012

Review 7.  Acquired hemophilia A: Updated review of evidence and treatment guidance.

Authors:  Rebecca Kruse-Jarres; Christine L Kempton; Francesco Baudo; Peter W Collins; Paul Knoebl; Cindy A Leissinger; Andreas Tiede; Craig M Kessler
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 8.  Venous thromboembolism diagnosis: unresolved issues.

Authors:  Marc Righini; Grégoire Le Gal; Henri Bounameaux
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Using evidence to determine diagnostic test efficacy.

Authors:  William H Replogle; William D Johnson; Kim Welch Hoover
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Carson; Simon J Stanworth; Nareg Roubinian; Dean A Fergusson; Darrell Triulzi; Carolyn Doree; Paul C Hebert
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.