J Graham Thomas1, Dale S Bond1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) use mobile computers, sensors, and software analytics to automatically detect behavior and deliver tailored treatment. However, little is known about how JITAIs influence patterns of behavior or how best to design JITAIs for maximum effect. METHOD: This study examined prompts and behavioral response to the B-MOBILE JITAI for reducing sedentary behavior (SB) in overweight/obese individuals. Thirty participants (83% women; 67% White, mean ± SD body mass index = 36.2 kg/m2) tested 3 conditions presented in a randomized counterbalanced order involving smartphone-based prompts for walking breaks of (a) 3 min after 30 SB min, (b) 6 min after 60 SB min, and (c) 12 min after 120 SB min. RESULTS: Participants carried the smartphone an average of 6.90 days during each 7-day condition, for an average of 14.94 hr per day. The 3- and 6-min conditions resulted in the greatest number of prompts, walking breaks, the best adherence to prompts, the greatest amount of daily time spent in walking breaks, and fastest adherence to prompts (ps < .01). Small but statistically significant decreases in the number of daily walking breaks, adherence to prompts, and minutes per day spent in walking breaks were observed as a function of the number of days spent in a condition (ps < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The B-MOBILE JITAI was effective in prompting breaks in sedentary behavior when it was most clinically relevant. Frequent prompts for small change may be an optimal strategy for shaping sedentary behavior, although more research is needed to determine how best to promote long-term adherence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) use mobile computers, sensors, and software analytics to automatically detect behavior and deliver tailored treatment. However, little is known about how JITAIs influence patterns of behavior or how best to design JITAIs for maximum effect. METHOD: This study examined prompts and behavioral response to the B-MOBILE JITAI for reducing sedentary behavior (SB) in overweight/obese individuals. Thirty participants (83% women; 67% White, mean ± SD body mass index = 36.2 kg/m2) tested 3 conditions presented in a randomized counterbalanced order involving smartphone-based prompts for walking breaks of (a) 3 min after 30 SB min, (b) 6 min after 60 SB min, and (c) 12 min after 120 SB min. RESULTS:Participants carried the smartphone an average of 6.90 days during each 7-day condition, for an average of 14.94 hr per day. The 3- and 6-min conditions resulted in the greatest number of prompts, walking breaks, the best adherence to prompts, the greatest amount of daily time spent in walking breaks, and fastest adherence to prompts (ps < .01). Small but statistically significant decreases in the number of daily walking breaks, adherence to prompts, and minutes per day spent in walking breaks were observed as a function of the number of days spent in a condition (ps < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The B-MOBILE JITAI was effective in prompting breaks in sedentary behavior when it was most clinically relevant. Frequent prompts for small change may be an optimal strategy for shaping sedentary behavior, although more research is needed to determine how best to promote long-term adherence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Charles E Matthews; Stephanie M George; Steven C Moore; Heather R Bowles; Aaron Blair; Yikyung Park; Richard P Troiano; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; David W Dunstan; Jo Salmon; Ester Cerin; Jonathan E Shaw; Paul Z Zimmet; Neville Owen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Genevieve N Healy; Charles E Matthews; David W Dunstan; Elisabeth A H Winkler; Neville Owen Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: David W Dunstan; Bronwyn A Kingwell; Robyn Larsen; Genevieve N Healy; Ester Cerin; Marc T Hamilton; Jonathan E Shaw; David A Bertovic; Paul Z Zimmet; Jo Salmon; Neville Owen Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Andrea Bankoski; Tamara B Harris; James J McClain; Robert J Brychta; Paolo Caserotti; Kong Y Chen; David Berrigan; Richard P Troiano; Annemarie Koster Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Predrag Klasnja; Shawna Smith; Nicholas J Seewald; Andy Lee; Kelly Hall; Brook Luers; Eric B Hekler; Susan A Murphy Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2019-05-03
Authors: Jimi Huh; Christian J Cerrada; Eldin Dzubur; Genevieve F Dunton; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Adam M Leventhal Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Evan M Forman; Stephanie P Goldstein; Fengqing Zhang; Brittney C Evans; Stephanie M Manasse; Meghan L Butryn; Adrienne S Juarascio; Pramod Abichandani; Gerald J Martin; Gary D Foster Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: David E Conroy; Sarah Hojjatinia; Constantino M Lagoa; Chih-Hsiang Yang; Stephanie T Lanza; Joshua M Smyth Journal: Psychol Sport Exerc Date: 2018-06-28
Authors: Brooke T Nezami; Carmina G Valle; Alison K Nulty; Mark Espeland; Rena R Wing; Deborah F Tate Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 5.002