Literature DB >> 26649092

Comparison of treatment costs of laparoscopic and open surgery.

Jacek A Śmigielski1, Łukasz Piskorz2, Włodzimierz Koptas1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopy has been a standard procedure in most medical centres providing surgical services for many years. Both the range and number of laparoscopic procedures performed are constantly increasing. Over the last decade, laparoscopic procedures have been successfully applied both in emergency and oncological surgery. However, treatment costs have become a more important factor in choosing between open or laparoscopic procedures. AIM: To present the total real costs of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy and sigmoidectomy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1 May 2010 and 30 March 2015 in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, General and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, and in the Department of General Surgery of the Saint John of God Hospital, Lodz, doctors performed 1404 cholecystectomies, 392 appendectomies and 88 sigmoidectomies. A total of 97% of the cholecystectomy procedures were laparoscopic and 3% were open. Similarly, 22% of total appendectomies were laparoscopic and 78% were open, while 9% of sigmoidectomies were laparoscopic and 91% open.
RESULTS: The requirement for single-use equipment in laparoscopic procedures increases the expense. However, after adding up all other costs, surprisingly, differences between the costs of laparoscopic and open procedures ranged from 451 PLN/€ 114 for laparoscopic operations to 611 PLN/€ 153 for open operations.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, considered the standard surgery for treating gallbladder diseases, is cheaper than open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomy and sigmoidectomy are safe methods of minimally invasive surgery, slightly more expensive than open operations. Of all the analyzed procedures, one-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most profitable. The costs of both laparoscopic and open sigmoidectomy are greatly underestimated in Poland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  appendectomy; cholecystectomy; costs of treatment; laparoscopy; open surgery; sigmoidectomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26649092      PMCID: PMC4653254          DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2015.54055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne        ISSN: 1895-4588            Impact factor:   1.195


Introduction

Laparoscopy has been a standard procedure offered for many years by most medical centres providing surgical services in Poland. The number of laparoscopic procedures is steadily increasing, as is their range. For some time, laparoscopic procedures have been successfully applied in the treatment of acute cases, such as acute cholecystitis and acute appendicitis [1-3], and minimally invasive techniques, such as exploratory laparoscopy, are increasingly used in diagnostics [4, 5]. The development of videoscopy also allows for the treatment of neoplastic diseases. While the surgical team always considers the clinical condition of the patient and concomitant disturbances, including their past surgical history, in choosing between the open or laparoscopic procedures [6], the cost of therapy is now also playing a more important role [7]. A laparoscopic procedure results in minimal interference in the condition and functioning of the patient, and the wound is as properly dressed as in an open procedure. A smaller post-operative wound reduces post-operative pain, which in turn contributes to a lower risk of infection and post-operative hernia [8]. Shorter hospitalization time and post-operative recovery might also reduce treatment costs [9].

Aim

The aim of the study is to present the total real costs of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy and sigmoidectomy.

Material and methods

Between 1 May 2010 and 30 March 2014 in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, General and Oncological Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, and the Department of General Surgery of the Saint John of God Hospital, Lodz, 1404 cholecystectomies, 393 appendectomies and 88 sigmoidectomies were performed. In total, 97% of the cholecystectomy procedures were laparoscopic operations and 3% were open operations. Similarly, 18% of appendectomies were laparoscopic and 82% were open, and 9% of sigmoidectomies were laparoscopic and 91% were open. In patients who underwent cholecystectomy, a laparoscopic procedure was standard. In more than ten patients, doctors performed open surgery due to prior surgical history, confirmed complicated acute cholecystitis or suspected gallbladder cancer. Although an open procedure was commonly used for appendectomy until 2011, since then some surgeons have been taking a laparoscopic approach. Likewise, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is a relatively new procedure in Poland [10, 11], with operations of this type only being performed since 2013, but only in selected patients. To simplify the following analysis, the following exchange rate was adopted: € 1 = 4 PLN. Cost analysis: average price of threads = 8 PLN/€ 2 per piece; hospital stay in the University Teaching Hospital – Central Veterans’ Hospital in Lodz = 320 PLN/€ 80; cost of a surgeon in the operating theatre per hour = 100 PLN/€ 25 gross; the cost of work in the operating theatre was calculated according to the following formula: 1 hour of work of the operating theatre = 1 month of work of the operating block (the total time of all procedures/number of operating theatres)/maintenance costs of the operating block (electricity + personnel + indirect costs) = 360 PLN/€ 90; average operation time was calculated from operative reports; the cost of a single use of a reusable trocar was calculated by dividing its price (800 PLN/€ 200) by the average number (around 300) of laparoscopic procedures performed with the trocar in a period of a year = 2.60 PLN/€ 0.65; the cost of a single use of a grasper or reusable scissors was calculated by dividing their price (1800 PLN/€ 450) by the average number (around 300) of laparoscopic procedures performed in a period of a year = 6 PLN/€ 1.50; the cost of a single use of a grasper was calculated by dividing its price (2000 PLN/€ 500) by the average number of procedures performed with the grasper in a period of two years = 3.30 PLN/€ 0.83; the cost of a single use of a laparoscopic tower was calculated by dividing its price (225,000 PLN/€ 56,250) by a 5-year depreciation period and the average number of performed procedures: 225,000/(5 years × 300 procedures) = 150 PLN/€ 37.5

Results

The need for single-use equipment in laparoscopic procedures adds to the cost of the procedures. However, after adding up all other costs, the final results were surprising, with the differences between the costs of laparoscopic and open procedures ranging from 451 PLN/€ 113 for laparoscopic operations to 611 PLN/€ 153 for open operations, with a wide range of differences for each type of procedure: for appendectomy, the open procedure is 7.8% less expensive than laparoscopy, but for cholecystectomy, the open procedure is 28.6% more expensive than laparoscopy. While the cost of laparoscopic and open sigmoidectomies appear to be comparable, the latter is 8.9% cheaper. All the performed calculations are presented in Tables I–IV.
Table I

Costs of open and laparoscopic appendectomy

ParameterNo. open/lapOpen surgery[PLN/EURO]Laparoscopy [PLN/EURO]Notes
Hospital stay [days]1.9/1.3608/152416/104
Surgical team2/2140/35182/46
Operation time [min]42/55252/63330/82.5
Trocar 12 mm0/20/05.20/1.30
Trocar 5 mm0/10/02.60/0.65
Threads4*(1 – 4)/2*(4 – 5)32/816/4*1. Peritoneal stitch*2. Fascial stitch*3. Subcutaneous stitch*4. Dermal stitch*5. Roeder loop
Grasper 5 mm0/30/018/4.5Scissors included
Laparoscopic tower0/10/0150/38Optics included
Total1,032/2581,120/280
Table IV

Total cost of all procedures

ProcedurePrice [PLN/EURO]National Health FundProfit [PLN/EURO]
PointsCost [PLN/EURO]
Open appendectomy1,552/388472,444/611892/223
Laparoscopic appendectomy1,640/410472,444/611804/201
Open cholecystectomy2,098/524633,276/8191,178/295
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy1,647/412572,964/7411,317/329
Open sigmoidectomy6,799/1,7001105,720/1,430–1,079/–270
Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy7,410/1,8521105,720/1,430–1,690/–423
Costs of open and laparoscopic appendectomy Costs of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy Costs of open and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy Total cost of all procedures

Discussion

Most public health care centres face financial problems. The financial outcome of a centre is not often related to its personnel or work organization but potential financial problems result from underestimating the cost of surgical procedures funded by the NFZ (public health service). This study analysed the three most common surgical procedures performed using open and laparoscopic methods: cholecystectomy, appendectomy and sigmoidectomy. Both the direct cost of surgery and all the indirect costs incurred by the centre in order to provide patients with suitable therapy were included. The analysis does not include costs which are the same for the compared procedures, i.e.: 1) a set of reusable surgical instruments: clamps, pincers, scissors, peans, etc.; 2) sterilization of a set of surgical instruments; 3) preparing the patient and operative area; 4) anaesthetizing the patient; 5) draping the patient; 6) the cost of histopathological examination. The total cost of the above procedures is around 520 PLN/€ 130. Table IV presents the total cost of hospital treatment, including the procedures required for both open and laparoscopic methods. When considering the costs of sigmoidectomy, it should be pointed out that the price of the most commonly used mechanical stapler, the CEEA 31 mm, substantially increases the total cost of surgery, by 1,600 PLN/€ 400. This equipment is used in both the open and laparoscopic methods. All trocars used in the evaluated laparoscopic procedures are reusable, and their only replaceable part is a seal, which should be replaced after about 200 procedures. Undoubtedly, the application of single-use trocars would considerably increase the total cost of laparoscopic operations. Conversion is another factor contributing to an increase in the cost of surgery [12]. The costs of converted procedures will be subject to a separate analysis. Open appendectomy was 88 PLN/€ 22 (7.8%) cheaper than laparoscopic appendectomy, although based on financial settlements with the NFZ (public health service), both methods were found to be profitable: 892 PLN/€ 223 and 804 PLN/€ 201 respectively. Similarly, open sigmoidectomy is 611 PLN/€ 153 cheaper (8.9%) than laparoscopic surgery, despite longer post-operative hospitalization. The period of hospitalization after a laparoscopic procedure was reduced due to less acute post-operative pain, the application of a “fast track” recovery programme and the fact that the patients can regain their mobility more quickly [13]. Unfortunately, both methods incur losses for the medical centre performing the procedures: 1,079 PLN/€ 270 for the open surgery and 1,690 PLN/€ 422 for the laparoscopy. In contrast, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is 451 PLN/€ 113 (28.6%) cheaper than open cholecystectomy, and both methods are profitable for the centre, earning 1317 PLN/€ 329 for the laparoscopy and 1178 PLN/€ 295 for the open procedure. However, the techniques used in operations are constantly changing. “Single-incision” methods, which are now quite common, are more expensive than standard laparoscopy [14] and represent another challenge for surgeons. The question is whether the NFZ (public health service) will correctly estimate the cost of these innovative procedures.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, considered the standard surgical procedure in treating gallbladder diseases, is cheaper than open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomy and sigmoidectomy are safe methods of minimally invasive surgery which are only slightly more expensive than open operations. Of all the analyzed procedures, one-day laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most profitable for the centre. The costs of both laparoscopic and open sigmoidectomy are greatly underestimated in Poland.
Table II

Costs of open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy

ParameterNo. open/lapOpen surgery[PLN/EURO]Laparoscopy [PLN/EURO]Notes
Hospital stay [days]2.4/1.4768/192448/112
Surgical team3*/2348/87160/40*1 surgeon or automated retractor
Operation time1 h 10 min/48 min420/105288/72
Trocar 12 mm20/05.20/1.30
Trocar 5 mm10/02.60/0.65
Threads5*(1 – 5)/3*(1 + 3 + 5)40/1016/4*1. Peritoneal stitch*2. Muscular stitch*3. Fascial stitch *4. Subcutaneous stitch*5. Dermal stitch
Grasper 5 mm30/018/4.5Hook and scissors included
Laparoscopic tower10/0150/37.50Optics included
Clip applicator10/03.30/0.83
Clips1 pack – 6 pieces0/036/9
Total1,578/3941,127/282
Table III

Costs of open and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy

ParameterNo. open/lapOpen surgery [PLN/EURO]Laparoscopy [PLN/EURO]Notes
Hospital stay [days]4.4/3.81,408/3521,216/304
Surgical team3/2515/129500/125*1 surgeon or automated retractor
Operation time1 h 45 min/2 h15 min630/157.50900/225
Trocar 12 mm20/05.20/1,30
Trocar 5 mm20/05.20/1,30
Threads7*(1 – 6)/3*(1 + 3 + 5)56/1424/6*1. Peritoneal stitch*2. Muscular stitch*3. Fascial stitch*4. Subcutaneous stitch*5. Dermal stitch*6 Garter stitch
Grasper 5 mm50/030/5Hook and scissors included
LigaSure 5 mm10/01,800/450
LigaSure 10 mm11,600/4000/0
Laparoscopic tower10/0150/37.50Optics included
Reticular stapler10/0600/150
Stapler TA 601450/112.500/0
Clip applicator10/03.30/0.83
Clips60/036/9
Stapler CEEA11,620/4051,620/405Stitch fixing a stapler head
Total6,279/15706,890/1722
  14 in total

1.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is safe and benefits octogenarian patients with malignant disease: a matched case-control study comparing laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Frederick H Koh; Jiayi Wong; Jarrod K Tan; Ker-Kan Tan; Wai-Kit Cheong; Bettina Lieske
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Risk factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic major liver resection.

Authors:  F Cauchy; D Fuks; T Nomi; L Schwarz; L Barbier; S Dokmak; O Scatton; J Belghiti; O Soubrane; B Gayet
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Is laparoscopic appendectomy going to be standard procedure for acute appendicitis; a 5-year single center experience with 1,788 patients.

Authors:  M A Bozkurt; M G Unsal; S Kapan; M Gonenc; M Dogan; M U Kalayci; H Alis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy--can we afford that? Cost comparison of different surgical techniques.

Authors:  Maciej Matyja; Marcin Strzałka; Anna Zychowicz; Damian Kołodziej; Kazimierz Rembiasz; Andrzej Budzyński
Journal:  Pol Przegl Chir       Date:  2014-04

Review 5.  Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain.

Authors:  Sarah L Gans; Margreet A Pols; Jaap Stoker; Marja A Boermeester
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.588

6.  Optimizing cost and short-term outcomes for elderly patients in laparoscopic colonic surgery.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Justin K Lawrence; Tamar Nobel; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The role of laparoscopy in the management of pediatric appendicitis: a survey of Polish pediatric surgeons.

Authors:  Andrzej Golebiewski; Piotr Czauderna
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.195

8.  Role of laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal metastases considered for cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Authors:  Thejus T Jayakrishnan; Anthony J Zacharias; Avishkar Sharma; Sam G Pappas; T Clark Gamblin; Kiran K Turaga
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 2.754

9.  SILS: Is It Cost- and Time-Effective Compared to Standard Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery?

Authors:  Saidul Islam; Stephen D Adams; Anies A Mahomed
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-07-30

10.  Fast track in large intestine surgery - review of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Krystyn Sosada; Maciej Wiewiora; Jerzy Piecuch; Wojciech Zurawiński
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 1.195

View more
  6 in total

1.  Single center experience in laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder perforation.

Authors:  Nuri Alper Sahbaz; Kivanc Derya Peker; Hamit Ahmet Kabuli; Alpen Yahya Gumusoglu; Halil Alis
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 1.195

2.  Schwannoma in the porta hepatis - laparoscopic excision under laparoscopic ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Maciej Sebastian; Maciej Sroczyński; Piotr Donizy; Jerzy Rudnicki
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 1.195

3.  Unexpected pathological findings after laparoscopic cholecystectomy - analysis of 1131 cases.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bartosiak; Maciej Liszka; Tomasz Drazba; Krzysztof Paśnik; Michal R Janik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Hybrid appendectomy with classic trocar on McBurney's point.

Authors:  Mehmet Emin Gunes; Feyzullah Ersoz; Yigit Duzkoylu; Soykan Arikan; Coskun Cakir; Ali Emre Nayci
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 1.195

5.  Laparoscopic management of abdominal pseudocyst following ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation in hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Maciej Sebastian; Agata Sebastian; Maciej Sroczyński; Jerzy Rudnicki
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Evaluation of the usefulness of the SAGES Safe Cholecystectomy Program from the viewpoint of the European surgeon.

Authors:  Paweł Bogacki; Jan Krzak; Katarzyna Gotfryd-Bugajska; Mirosław Szura
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 1.195

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.