Literature DB >> 29062453

Schwannoma in the porta hepatis - laparoscopic excision under laparoscopic ultrasound guidance.

Maciej Sebastian1, Maciej Sroczyński1, Piotr Donizy2, Jerzy Rudnicki1.   

Abstract

Schwannomas are usually benign tumors attached to peripheral nerves and are rarely found in the gastrointestinal tract. Schwannomas in the porta hepatis are extremely rare, with only 15 cases described in the literature to date. A 22-year-old female patient presented with colicky upper abdominal pain lasting 3 months. Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity revealed a tumor in the porta hepatis. The patient was qualified for laparoscopy. The tumor was totally excised laparoscopically under guidance of laparoscopic ultrasound without intra- or postoperative complications. Postoperative histopathological examination confirmed the porta hepatic schwannoma. The patient recovered uneventfully with very good cosmetic results. In the follow-up period of 5 months we have not observed any abdominal or general health problems. The present case is the first report in the world of laparoscopic ultrasound guided laparoscopic excision of a porta hepatic schwannoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laparoscopy; magnetic resonance imaging; schwannoma; ultrasound

Year:  2017        PMID: 29062453      PMCID: PMC5649500          DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.68795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne        ISSN: 1895-4588            Impact factor:   1.195


Introduction

Schwannomas are usually solitary peripheral nerve sheath tumors which in most cases appear sporadically, though some are associated with neurofibromatosis type 2, schwannomatosis, Carney’s complex or radiation, very rarely undergo malignant transformation and respond well to excision in accessible locations [1]. They rarely occur in the abdominal cavity, particularly the stomach. Treatment of schwannoma in the porta hepatis consists of complete excision with free margins without lymphadenectomy. The overall prognosis is very good [1].

Case report

A 22-year-old woman was admitted to our department on September 29, 2016 complaining of colicky upper abdominal pain lasting 3 months. There were no abnormalities found on clinical examination or in the laboratory investigations. The patient did not have any abdominal operations, and family and personal history was without relevance. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a 3.5 × 2 × 2 cm tumor in the porta hepatis without invasion of the vessels or bile ducts (Photos 1 A, B).
Photo 1

Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 3.5 × 2 × 2 cm tumor in the porta hepatis without invasion of the vessels and bile ducts. A – Low signal in T1-weighted imaging (arrow). B – High signal intensity in T2-weighted imaging (arrow)

Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 3.5 × 2 × 2 cm tumor in the porta hepatis without invasion of the vessels and bile ducts. A – Low signal in T1-weighted imaging (arrow). B – High signal intensity in T2-weighted imaging (arrow) After obtaining informed consent the patient was qualified for laparoscopy. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The trocar sites were identical as in standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (we used two 5 mm trocars and two 10 mm trocars) – a 10 mm trocar at the umbilicus (camera), a 10 mm trocar below the xiphoid process (dissector/grasper/ultrasound probe), a 5 mm trocar below the right costal arch (dissector/grasper) and a 5 mm trocar in the middle line between the umbilicus and the xiphoid process (retractor). An ultrasound probe was inserted through the epigastric 10 mm trocar. We used the laparoscopic probe Toshiba PEF-704 LA (frequency 7.0 MHz) and the diagnostic ultrasound system Toshiba NemioMX SSA-590A. Snake liver retractor 5 mm was used for liver traction (Photos 2 A–D). Duplex Doppler function enabled differentiation between the vascular and avascular structures. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS) was performed several times during surgery and enabled a safe plane of dissection. It was extremely useful during dissection and separation of the tumor from the bile duct because there was no well-defined plane in this localization (Photos 3 A, B). Intraoperatively and postoperatively we did not observe any complications. Postoperative histopathological and immunohistochemical examination revealed a totally excised 3.5 × 2 × 2 cm benign schwannoma S100 (+), smooth muscle actin (SMA) (–), CD117 (–), CD34 (+) – only in blood vessels, Ki-67 (+) < 1% of tumor cells (Photos 4 A–D). The patient recovered uneventfully and we did not observe any complications during the 5-month follow-up period.
Photo 2

A – Tumor in the porta hepatis (long arrow). Gallbladder (*) and duodenum (#). Liver is retracted with snake liver retractor (x). B – Laparoscopic ultrasound (L) defines the correct plane of dissection. Tumor (long arrow), gallbladder (*) and duodenum (#). C – Excision of tumor (long arrow) is carried out in healthy margins without injury to the bile duct (+) and portal vein (short arrow). Gallbladder (*) and duodenum (#). D – Bile duct (+) and portal vein (short arrow) are very clearly visible after excision of tumor. Gallbladder (*)

Photo 3

A – Laparoscopic ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic mass (*) lying over the portal vein (#) and proper hepatic artery (+). Hyperechoic capsule of tumor (long arrow) without angioinvasion enables safe dissection over vessels. B – There is no clearly visible border between the tumor (*) and the bile duct (short arrow) but careful dissection in this plane did not injure the bile duct. Portal vein (#)

Photo 4

Liver tumor mass with solid proliferation of interlacing fascicles of fusiform cells. Atypical mitotic figures and fields of necrosis were not observed (A): 100×, 400×, H&E staining; (B): 200×, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Strong S100 protein expression in tumor cells (C): 100×, hematoxylin. Lack of smooth muscle actin (SMA) immunoreactivity in neoplastic cells with strong expression observed only in blood vessels (D): 200×, hematoxylin

A – Tumor in the porta hepatis (long arrow). Gallbladder (*) and duodenum (#). Liver is retracted with snake liver retractor (x). B – Laparoscopic ultrasound (L) defines the correct plane of dissection. Tumor (long arrow), gallbladder (*) and duodenum (#). C – Excision of tumor (long arrow) is carried out in healthy margins without injury to the bile duct (+) and portal vein (short arrow). Gallbladder (*) and duodenum (#). D – Bile duct (+) and portal vein (short arrow) are very clearly visible after excision of tumor. Gallbladder (*) A – Laparoscopic ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic mass (*) lying over the portal vein (#) and proper hepatic artery (+). Hyperechoic capsule of tumor (long arrow) without angioinvasion enables safe dissection over vessels. B – There is no clearly visible border between the tumor (*) and the bile duct (short arrow) but careful dissection in this plane did not injure the bile duct. Portal vein (#) Liver tumor mass with solid proliferation of interlacing fascicles of fusiform cells. Atypical mitotic figures and fields of necrosis were not observed (A): 100×, 400×, H&E staining; (B): 200×, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Strong S100 protein expression in tumor cells (C): 100×, hematoxylin. Lack of smooth muscle actin (SMA) immunoreactivity in neoplastic cells with strong expression observed only in blood vessels (D): 200×, hematoxylin

Discussion

Porta hepatic schwannomas are extremely rare, with only 15 cases reported in the literature to date [2]. They originate from the sympathetic and parasympathetic fibers which are distributed along blood vessels in this localization. Macroscopically, schwannomas are spheroidal or ovoid in shape. Larger tumors may undergo secondary degeneration [2, 3]. Pathogenesis of both sporadic and genetically acquired schwannomas is associated with defects in the merlin signaling pathways. Differential diagnosis should include gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), leiomyomas, nerve sheath tumors, lymph node tuberculosis, lymphoma, giant lymph node hyperplasia, hemangiomas and Klatskin tumor. Immunohistochemically they are strongly S100 reactive, SMA negative, CD34 negative and CD 117 negative. Leiomyomas are negative for S100 and positive for SMA. A few gastrointestinal tumors (GIST) are also positive for S-100, but they are also positive for either CD34 or CD117 [4-6]. The mean age of patients in the reported cases was 48 years (29–74 years) and the male-female ratio was 6 : 9. The exact location of the tumor was the porta hepatis (9 patients), the hepatoduodenal ligament (5 patients) and the proper hepatic artery (1 patient). The mean tumor diameter was 4.7 cm (2.2–7.5 cm). Symptoms were associated with compression of adjacent structures. Nine (60%) patients were symptomatic and complained of distension/abdominal discomfort (5 patients – 33%), abdominal pain (4 patients – 27%), jaundice/dark urine/colorless stool/pruritus (2 patients – 13%), nausea/vomiting/anorexia (1 patient – 7%) and weight loss (1 patient – 7%). Preoperative diagnostic imaging was nonspecific. Ultrasound imaging revealed a solid isoechoic or hypoechoic well-bordered mass, computed tomography a heterogeneous mass with peripheral enhancement, MRI a mass with low signal intensity in T1 and high signal intensity in T2-weighted imaging [7, 8]. Fine needle aspiration performed preoperatively in 2 patients revealed suspected spindle cell neoplasia or stromal tumor [2]. Only 7 patients out of 15 underwent complete tumor excision. Due to invasion of adjacent structures 1 patient had en bloc right hepatectomy, 2 patients en bloc resection of the hepatic artery, 1 patient partial resection of the extrahepatic bile duct with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy and one patient had a T-tube bile duct drainage due to the bile duct injury. There were no recurrences in the mean follow-up period of 16 months (3–41 months) among 6 postoperatively observed patients. All the operations were performed in an open manner and there were no reports about the use of LUS [2]. The LUS during diagnostic laparoscopy is used in the preoperative staging of pancreatico-biliary cancers for detecting unresectable disease, enabling direct assessment of the peritoneal cavity, liver, lymph nodes and related vascular structures. The LUS is also used for staging of hepatocellular cancer or metastasis of colon cancer, staging of gastric cancer, to localize tumors during adrenalectomy and in biliary disease as an alternative to intraoperative cholangiography to identify choledocholithiasis and anatomical relationships in the plane of dissection [9, 10]. Laparoscopic surgery results in minimal injury to the tissues, smaller post-operative wounds and less post-operative pain, which are associated with a lower risk of infection and post-operative hernia. The resulting shorter hospitalization time may lead to a reduction of the treatment costs [11].

Conclusions

We described a case of a very rare disease location which can be successfully treated laparoscopically with all of its advantages for the patient. The LUS as a method of intraoperative guidance during difficult and hazardous preparation navigated the surgeon in the hostile environment and enabled successful performance of the procedure. The LUS enabled the surgeon to find the right plane of dissection without injury to the surrounding tissues.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  11 in total

Review 1.  The role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deepak Hariharan; Vasilis Constantinides; Hemant M Kocher; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Schwannoma of the liver: report of two surgical cases.

Authors:  Y Wada; A Jimi; O Nakashima; M Kojiro; T Kurohiji; K Sai
Journal:  Pathol Int       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.534

3.  Role of laparoscopic ultrasound during diagnostic laparoscopy for proximal biliary cancers: a single series of 100 patients.

Authors:  Nadia Russolillo; Marco D'Eletto; Serena Langella; Serena Perotti; Roberto Lo Tesoriere; Fabio Forchino; Alessandro Ferrero
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Jerzy Lasota
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Biliary tract schwannoma: a rare cause of obstructive jaundice in a young patient.

Authors:  Gilton Marques Fonseca; André Luis Montagnini; Manoel de Souza Rocha; Rosely Antunes Patzina; Mário Vinícius Angelete Alvarez Bernardes; Ivan Cecconello; José Jukemura
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Liver schwannoma: findings on MRI.

Authors:  Amir Javad Momtahen; Ece Isin Akduman; Numan Cem Balci; Rana Fattahi; Necat Havlioglu
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Benign schwannomas: pathologic basis for CT inhomogeneities.

Authors:  L M Cohen; A M Schwartz; S D Rockoff
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Benign schwannoma of the liver: a case report.

Authors:  Won Hyun Lee; Tae Hyo Kim; Soong Suk You; Sun Pil Choi; Hyun Ju Min; Hyun Jin Kim; Ok Jae Lee; Gyung Hyuck Ko
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Porta hepatic schwannoma: case report and a 30-year review of the literature yielding 15 cases.

Authors:  Sheng-yong Yin; Zheng-long Zhai; Kui-wu Ren; Yun-chuan Yang; Da-long Wan; Xiao-yan Liu; Li-jun Wang; Shu-sen Zheng
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Comparison of treatment costs of laparoscopic and open surgery.

Authors:  Jacek A Śmigielski; Łukasz Piskorz; Włodzimierz Koptas
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 1.195

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Schwannoma in and around the porta hepatis: radiological features in eight cases and literature review.

Authors:  Moto Nakaya; Ryo Kurokawa; Takeyuki Watadani; Hiroyuki Morisaka; Maika Higuchi; Yusuke Toda; Hideki Kunichika; Masashi Kusakabe; Yoshitaka Okada; Yoshimitsu Ohgiya; Masahiro Okada; Hiroshi Anai; Osamu Abe; Manabu Minami
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-04-30

2.  Schwannoma in the hepatoduodenal ligament with portal vein invasion: A case report.

Authors:  Jun-Ke Wang; Qian Wu; Zhen-Ru Wu; Fei Liu; Cong-Dun Ran; Chang-Hao Yin; Fu-Yu Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.