PURPOSE: Increased physiological stress from laparoscopic surgery and the lower physiological reserves in the elderly are causes for concern. This study aims to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in octogenarians. METHODS: Octogenarians who underwent elective colorectal resections from 2000 to 2011 were reviewed. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were matched for comorbidities, T-staging and type of resection performed to patients with open surgery. RESULTS: Each group had 36 patients. Both groups were comparable for median age (85 vs 83, p = 0.43), gender (21 vs 18 males, p = 0.64) and the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.486). Both groups had comparable median maximal tumour dimensions (4.75 vs 4.25 cm, p = 0.38) and median number of lymph nodes harvested (15 vs 14, p = 0.94). The laparoscopic group had, however, a longer median operative time (167.5 vs 124.5 min, p < 0.001). Both groups had comparable median length of hospitalisation (8 vs 7, p = 0.83), number of complications with a grade of complication (GOC) of ≥3 (5 vs 7, p = 0.75) and 30-day mortality rates (8.3 vs 5.6%, p = 1.00). One-year survival rate for the open group was lower (75.0 vs 94.4%, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a longer operating time, laparoscopic surgery had comparable short-term outcomes and might have a long-term survival benefit.
PURPOSE: Increased physiological stress from laparoscopic surgery and the lower physiological reserves in the elderly are causes for concern. This study aims to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery in octogenarians. METHODS: Octogenarians who underwent elective colorectal resections from 2000 to 2011 were reviewed. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were matched for comorbidities, T-staging and type of resection performed to patients with open surgery. RESULTS: Each group had 36 patients. Both groups were comparable for median age (85 vs 83, p = 0.43), gender (21 vs 18 males, p = 0.64) and the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score (p = 0.486). Both groups had comparable median maximal tumour dimensions (4.75 vs 4.25 cm, p = 0.38) and median number of lymph nodes harvested (15 vs 14, p = 0.94). The laparoscopic group had, however, a longer median operative time (167.5 vs 124.5 min, p < 0.001). Both groups had comparable median length of hospitalisation (8 vs 7, p = 0.83), number of complications with a grade of complication (GOC) of ≥3 (5 vs 7, p = 0.75) and 30-day mortality rates (8.3 vs 5.6%, p = 1.00). One-year survival rate for the open group was lower (75.0 vs 94.4%, p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a longer operating time, laparoscopic surgery had comparable short-term outcomes and might have a long-term survival benefit.
Authors: Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Scott R Steele; Grace E Park; Eric K Johnson; Matthew J Martin; Alexander Stojadinovic; J A Maykel; Marlin W Causey Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Wah Siew Tan; Min Hoe Chew; Irene Ai Ling Lim; Kheng Hong Ng; Choong Leong Tang; Kong Weng Eu Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2011-12-03 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: R A Allardyce; P F Bagshaw; C M Frampton; F A Frizelle; P J Hewett; N A Rieger; J S Smith; M J Solomon; A R L Stevenson Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-07-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Frederick H Koh; Caroline H Loh; Winson J Tan; Leonard M L Ho; Dulcena Yen; Jason M W Chua; Shawn S X Kok; Sharmini S Sivarajah; Min-Hoe Chew; Fung-Joon Foo Journal: Nutr Clin Pract Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 3.204