Literature DB >> 25659265

Guideline for the diagnostic pathway in patients with acute abdominal pain.

Sarah L Gans1, Margreet A Pols, Jaap Stoker, Marja A Boermeester.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Diagnostic practice for acute abdominal pain at the Emergency Department varies widely and is mostly based on doctor's preferences. We aimed at developing an evidence-based guideline for the diagnostic pathway of patients with abdominal pain of non-traumatic origin.
METHODS: All available international literature on patients with acute abdominal pain was identified and graded according to their methodological quality by members of the multidisciplinary steering group. A guideline was synthetized, providing evidence-based recommendations together with considerations based on expertise of group members, patient preferences, costs, availability of facilities, and organizational aspects. DEFINITION: Uniform terminology is needed in patients with acute abdominal pain to avoid difficulty in interpretation and ease comparison of findings between studies. We propose the use of the following definition for acute abdominal pain: pain of nontraumatic origin with a maximum duration of 5 days. Clinical diagnosis: Clinical evaluation is advised to differentiate between urgent and nonurgent causes. The diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment is insufficient to identify the correct diagnosis but can discriminate between urgent and nonurgent causes. Patients suspected of nonurgent diagnoses can safely be reevaluated the next day. Based on current literature, no conclusions can be drawn on the differences in accuracy between residents and specialists. No conclusions can be drawn on the influence of a gynecological consultation. In patients suspected of an urgent condition, additional imaging is justified. CRP and WBC count alone are insufficient to discriminate urgent from nonurgent diagnoses. Diagnostic imaging: There is no place for conventional radiography in the work-up of patients with acute abdominal pain due to the lack of added value on top of clinical assessment. Computed tomography leads to the highest sensitivity and specificity in patients with acute abdominal pain. Positive predictive value of ultrasound is comparable with CT and therefore preferred as the first imaging modality due to the downsides of computed tomography; negative or inconclusive ultrasound is followed by CT. Based on current literature, no conclusions can be drawn on the added value of a diagnostic laparoscopy in the work-up of patients with acute abdominal pain. Antibiotic treatment should be started within the first hour after recognition of sepsis. Administration of opioids (analgesics) decreases the intensity of the pain and does not affect the accuracy of physical examination.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25659265     DOI: 10.1159/000371583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  31 in total

1.  [Acute Pelvic pain in women-gynecological causes].

Authors:  Stefan Hecht; Matthias Meissnitzer; Rosemarie Forstner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Identifying, Analyzing, and Visualizing Diagnostic Paths for Patients with Nonspecific Abdominal Pain.

Authors:  Goutham Rao; Katherine Kirley; Paul Epner; Yiye Zhang; Victoria Bauer; Rema Padman; Ying Zhou; Anthony Solomonides
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.342

Review 3.  [Upper abdominal pain: a frequent and multifaceted leading symptom in primary care internal medicine].

Authors:  G Fröhlich; H Fröhlich
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  [Requirements of clinicians on pathology : A viewpoint from pathology].

Authors:  C Wittekind; K-F Bürrig
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 5.  [Expectations of visceral surgeons from the results of clinical autopsies].

Authors:  N Schlegel; C-T Germer
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 6.  [Sonography in intensive care and emergency medicine : A new training concept].

Authors:  D Hempel; G Michels
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Emergency general surgery 'Hot Clinics' reduce admission rates and duration of inpatient stay.

Authors:  Francesca Th'ng; Christos Skouras; Alice Paterson-Brown; Rajan Ravindran; Peter Lamb; Andrew de Beaux; Simon Paterson-Brown; Damian J Mole
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-14

8.  Acute abdominal pain in the emergency department of a university hospital in Italy.

Authors:  Nicolò Caporale; Antonio Maria Morselli-Labate; Elena Nardi; Rosanna Cogliandro; Mario Cavazza; Vincenzo Stanghellini
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 9.  Noncontrast MRI of acute abdominal pain caused by gastrointestinal lesions: indications, protocol, and image interpretation.

Authors:  Akitoshi Inoue; Akira Furukawa; Kai Takaki; Yugo Imai; Shinichi Ota; Norihisa Nitta; Yoshiyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 2.374

10.  Epidemiology and outcomes of acute abdominal pain in a large urban Emergency Department: retrospective analysis of 5,340 cases.

Authors:  Gianfranco Cervellin; Riccardo Mora; Andrea Ticinesi; Tiziana Meschi; Ivan Comelli; Fausto Catena; Giuseppe Lippi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.