Literature DB >> 26648386

Neurosensoric disturbances after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar based on either panoramic imaging or cone beam CT scanning: A randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Lars B Petersen1, Michael Vaeth2, Ann Wenzel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pre-surgical CBCT has been suggested before removal of the mandibular third molar. Currently, the standard-of-care is two-dimensional (2D) panoramic imaging. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to analyse possible differences in neurosensoric disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve between patients undergoing either panoramic imaging or CBCT before surgical removal of the mandibular third molar. Furthermore, the aim was to perform a sensitivity analysis to assess the statistical significance of different assumptions related to sample size calculations.
METHODS: 230 patients were randomized to a scan group and a non-scan group. All patients were referred from practicing dentists in the Copenhagen area. Inclusion criteria were overlap of the root complex and the mandibular canal on a 2D radiographic image. Central allocation of the randomization code and double blind settings were established. The surgical removal was performed in a specialized surgical practice geographically and personally separated from the study practice. Registration of neurosensoric anomalies was performed with a Semmes-Weinstein test and a visual analogue scale questionnaire pre- and post-surgically.
RESULTS: In the scan group (n = 114), 21 episodes of neurosensoric disturbances were registered and in the non-scan group (n = 116), 13 episodes of neurosensoric disturbances were registered. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.14). Performing a sensitivity analysis confirmed that CBCT was not superior to panoramic imaging in avoiding neurosensoric disturbances.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of CBCT before removal of the mandibular third molar does not seem to reduce the number of neurosensoric disturbances.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT scanning; mandibular third molar; neurosensoric disturbances; surgical removal

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26648386      PMCID: PMC5308576          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  32 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Third molars in Norwegian general dental practice.

Authors:  T I Berge
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 4.  Coronectomy vs. total removal for third molar extraction: a systematic review.

Authors:  H Long; Y Zhou; L Liao; U Pyakurel; Y Wang; W Lai
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 5.  Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence.

Authors:  L H Matzen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Permanent sensory nerve impairment following third molar surgery: a prospective study.

Authors:  W Jerjes; B Swinson; D R Moles; M El-Maaytah; B Banu; T Upile; M Kumar; M Al Khawalde; M Vourvachis; H Hadi; S Kumar; C Hopper
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-08-04

7.  Sensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  D Gülicher; K L Gerlach
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 8.  Sensory testing of inferior alveolar nerve injuries: a review of methods used in prospective studies.

Authors:  Lucas J Poort; Johan W van Neck; Karel G H van der Wal
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Incidence of neurosensory deficits and recovery after lower third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study of 4338 cases.

Authors:  L K Cheung; Y Y Leung; L K Chow; M C M Wong; E K K Chan; Y H Fok
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 10.  Clinical significance of computed tomography assessment for third molar surgery.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamori; Kei Tomihara; Makoto Noguchi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28
View more
  12 in total

1.  Radiographic signs of pathology determining removal of an impacted mandibular third molar assessed in a panoramic image or CBCT.

Authors:  Louise H Matzen; Lars Schropp; Rubens Spin-Neto; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Editorial 1/2018.

Authors:  Ralf K W Schulze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Does a preoperative cone beam CT reduce complication rates in the surgical removal of complex lower third molars? A retrospective study including 486 cases.

Authors:  Jan C Klatt; Tony Sorowka; Lan Kluwe; Ralf Smeets; Martin Gosau; Henning Hanken
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.246

4.  Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.

Authors:  Louise H Matzen; Lars B Petersen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Radiographic prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury in third molar surgery.

Authors:  Sergio Uribe
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2017-10-27

Review 6.  Cone beam CT imaging of the mandibular third molar: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR).

Authors:  Louise Hauge Matzen; Erwin Berkhout
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Cone beam CT and treatment decision of mandibular third molars: removal vs. coronectomy-a 3-year audit.

Authors:  Louise Hauge Matzen; Julie Suhr Villefrance; Sven Erik Nørholt; Jesper Bak; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Panoramic versus CBCT used to reduce inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathalia Calzavara Del Lhano; Rosangela Almeida Ribeiro; Carolina Castro Martins; Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assis; Karina Lopes Devito
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Are different imaging methods affecting the treatment decision of extractions of mandibular third molars?

Authors:  Yifat Manor; Refael Abir; Alex Manor; Israel Kaffe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  The Risk Factors that Can Increase Possibility of Mandibular Canal Wall Damage in Adult: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Study in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yafei Chen; Jiyuan Liu; Jun Pei; Yuanyuan Liu; Jian Pan
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-01-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.