Literature DB >> 25071882

Clinical significance of computed tomography assessment for third molar surgery.

Kenji Nakamori1, Kei Tomihara1, Makoto Noguchi1.   

Abstract

Surgical extraction of the third molar is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the clinical practice of oral surgery. Third molar surgery is warranted when there is inadequate space for eruption, malpositioning, or risk for cyst or odontogenic tumor formation. Preoperative assessment should include a detailed morphologic analysis of the third molar and its relationship to adjacent structures and surrounding tissues. Due to developments in medical engineering technology, computed tomography (CT) now plays a critical role in providing the clear images required for adequate assessment prior to third molar surgery. Removal of the maxillary third molar is associated with a risk for maxillary sinus perforation, whereas removal of the mandibular third molar can put patients at risk for a neurosensory deficit from damage to the lingual nerve or inferior alveolar nerve. Multiple factors, including demographic, anatomic, and treatment-related factors, influence the incidence of nerve injury during or following removal of the third molar. CT assessment of the third molar prior to surgery can identify some of these risk factors, such as the absence of cortication between the mandibular third molar and the inferior alveolar canal, prior to surgery to reduce the risk for nerve damage. This topic highlight presents an overview of the clinical significance of CT assessment in third molar surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Computed tomography; Extraction; Oral surgery; Third molar

Year:  2014        PMID: 25071882      PMCID: PMC4109093          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v6.i7.417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  42 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Risk factors of neurosensory deficits in lower third molar surgery: an literature review of prospective studies.

Authors:  Y Y Leung; L K Cheung
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.789

3.  Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Frederico Sampaio Neves; Monikelly Carmo Chagas Nascimento; Matheus Lima Oliveira; Solange Maria Almeida; Frab Norberto Bóscolo
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-08-24

Review 4.  Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar.

Authors:  Momen A Atieh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Does computed tomographic assessment of inferior alveolar canal cortical integrity predict nerve exposure during third molar surgery?

Authors:  Srinivas M Susarla; Harlyn K Sidhu; Laura L Avery; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  A novel surgical approach to impacted mandibular third molars to reduce the risk of paresthesia: a case series.

Authors:  Luca Landi; Paolo Francesco Manicone; Stefano Piccinelli; Alessandro Raia; Roberto Raia
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography.

Authors:  Yoichi Nakagawa; Hisako Ishii; Yoshiaki Nomura; Nobuyuki Y Watanabe; Daigo Hoshiba; Kaoru Kobayashi; Katsunori Ishibashi
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery.

Authors:  J P Rood; B A Shehab
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  Clinical assessment of the relationship between the third molar and the inferior alveolar canal using panoramic images and computed tomography.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamori; Kumiko Fujiwara; Akihiro Miyazaki; Kei Tomihara; Manabu Tsuji; Mitsuyoshi Nakai; Yoshitaka Michifuri; Rina Suzuki; Kiyoto Komai; Makoto Shimanishi; Hiroyoshi Hiratsuka
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Effect of exposed inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during surgical removal of impacted lower third molars.

Authors:  Andrew Ban Guan Tay; Wee Ser Go
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT compared to panoramic radiography in predicting IAN exposure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Veronica Caroline Brito Reia; Gabriel de Toledo Telles-Araujo; Mariela Peralta-Mamani; Mariel Ruivo Biancardi; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira; Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Risk stratification against inferior alveolar nerve injury after lower third molar extraction by scoring on cone-beam computed tomography image.

Authors:  Seiko Kubota; Tomoaki Imai; Mitsuhiro Nakazawa; Narikazu Uzawa
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Neurosensoric disturbances after surgical removal of the mandibular third molar based on either panoramic imaging or cone beam CT scanning: A randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Authors:  Lars B Petersen; Michael Vaeth; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in defining spatial relationships between third molar roots and inferior alveolar nerve.

Authors:  Roberto Pippi; Marcello Santoro; Ferdinando D'Ambrosio
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

5.  Minimum size and positioning of imaging field for CBCT-scans of impacted lower third molars: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Anne-Mari Ilo; Marja Ekholm; Elmira Pakbaznejad Esmaeili; Janna Waltimo-Sirén
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.757

6.  Prediction of neurosensory disorders after impacted third molar extraction based on cone beam CT Maglione's classification: A pilot study.

Authors:  Sally Awad; Sara M ElKhateeb
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-08-13

7.  Assessment of maxillary third molars with panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Yun-Hoa Jung; Bong-Hae Cho
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2015-12-17

8.  Three-dimensional analysis of impacted maxillary third molars: A cone-beam computed tomographic study of the position and depth of impaction.

Authors:  Priscila Ferreira de Andrade; Jesca Neftali Nogueira Silva; Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior; Cleide Gisele Ribeiro; Karina Lopes Devito; Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assis
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2017-09-21

9.  Preoperative imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve canal by cone-beam computed tomography and 1-year neurosensory recovery following mandibular setback through bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ali Hassani; Vahid Rakhshan; Mohammad Hassani; Hamidreza Mahaseni Aghdam
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-02-26

10.  Comparison of Digital OPG and CBCT in Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Inferior Nerve Injury during Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.

Authors:  Rakhi Issrani; Namdeo Prabhu; Mohammed Sghaireen; Hasna Rasheed Alshubrmi; Amal Mohamed Alanazi; Zainab Ali Alkhalaf; Mohammed Odhayd Alnusayri; Fahad Muqbil Aljohani; Zafar A Khan
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.