Lucas J Poort1, Johan W van Neck, Karel G H van der Wal. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. l.poort@erasmusmc.nl
Abstract
PURPOSE: The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) can be injured during trauma or surgery. So far there is no consensus for evaluating IAN injury. This study aimed to identify a testing method suitable for daily clinical practice which allows us to identify nerve injury, grade its severity, and monitor its recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Covering a 20-year period, prospective studies on sensory changes after mandibular procedures were reviewed regarding sensory testing methods; 75 studies on third molar removal, osteotomy, fracture, and implants were included. RESULTS: These studies reported varying incidences. In third molar removal and implant studies, a limited number of sensory tests were used, whereas in osteotomy and fracture studies more detailed testing was performed, using reproducible tests like light touch test with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and 2-point discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory function was not uniformly tested and presented, making a comparison of data impossible and highlighting the need for uniform testing methodology. Based on the results of this review, the light touch test with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for grading is recommended, using a grid and control site describing unilateral or bilateral nerve injury. Additionally, a visual analog scale-based questionnaire should be used to evaluate subjective sensibility. Using this method to test IAN injuries will allow comparison of future studies and provide valuable insight in the severity and prognosis of IAN injuries.
PURPOSE: The inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) can be injured during trauma or surgery. So far there is no consensus for evaluating IAN injury. This study aimed to identify a testing method suitable for daily clinical practice which allows us to identify nerve injury, grade its severity, and monitor its recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Covering a 20-year period, prospective studies on sensory changes after mandibular procedures were reviewed regarding sensory testing methods; 75 studies on third molar removal, osteotomy, fracture, and implants were included. RESULTS: These studies reported varying incidences. In third molar removal and implant studies, a limited number of sensory tests were used, whereas in osteotomy and fracture studies more detailed testing was performed, using reproducible tests like light touch test with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and 2-point discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory function was not uniformly tested and presented, making a comparison of data impossible and highlighting the need for uniform testing methodology. Based on the results of this review, the light touch test with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments for grading is recommended, using a grid and control site describing unilateral or bilateral nerve injury. Additionally, a visual analog scale-based questionnaire should be used to evaluate subjective sensibility. Using this method to test IAN injuries will allow comparison of future studies and provide valuable insight in the severity and prognosis of IAN injuries.
Authors: Annelie Miclotte; Jeroen Van Hevele; Ann Roels; Jürgen Elaut; Guy Willems; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-12-19 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Sareh Said Yekta; Felix Koch; Maurice B Grosjean; Marcella Esteves-Oliveira; Jamal M Stein; Alireza Ghassemi; Dieter Riediger; Friedrich Lampert; Ralf Smeets Journal: Head Face Med Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 2.151