Literature DB >> 31778318

Cone beam CT and treatment decision of mandibular third molars: removal vs. coronectomy-a 3-year audit.

Louise Hauge Matzen1, Julie Suhr Villefrance1, Sven Erik Nørholt2,3, Jesper Bak2, Ann Wenzel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess: (1) the workflow in the treatment decision process of mandibular third molars based on a panoramic image and CBCT and (2) the impact of radiographic markers in CBCT on the decision to perform coronectomy.
METHODS: 1437 teeth in 917 patients (mean age 27.8 years, range 18-72) underwent clinical and panoramic examination. If there was an indication for removal of the tooth, and signs of a close relation to the inferior alveolar nerve were present in the panoramic image, a CBCT was performed. Treatment decision based on panoramic image and CBCT was calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to assess whether signs in CBCT had an impact on the treatment decision "coronectomy". Moreover, the actually operated teeth and post-operative sensory disturbances were assessed and discussed in relation to the radiographic method.
RESULTS: Based on the panoramic image, in 462 cases it was decided not to treat, 553 were scheduled for surgery, and 422 referred for a CBCT examination. "No bony separation between the tooth and mandibular canal" seen in CBCT was the main factor influencing the decision to perform a coronectomy (odds ratio = 56.8, p < 0.001). 840 mandibular third molars had undergone surgical intervention, 152 had a coronectomy and 688 were fully removed. Six patients perceived a sensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve: one permanent and five temporary.
CONCLUSION: 29% of the examined cases were referred for a CBCT and of these, the majority were scheduled for coronectomy based on the sign "no bony separation between the tooth and mandibular canal" seen in CBCT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CBCT; clinical decision making; coronectomy; molar, third

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31778318      PMCID: PMC7068077          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  23 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal.

Authors:  Lennart Flygare; Anders Ohman
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Characteristic findings on panoramic radiography and cone-beam CT to predict paresthesia after extraction of impacted third molar.

Authors:  Nana Harada; Subash Beloor Vasudeva; Yukiko Matsuda; Kenji Seki; Rishabh Kapila; Noboru Ishikawa; Tomohiro Okano; Tsukasa Sano
Journal:  Bull Tokyo Dent Coll       Date:  2015

3.  Influence of cone beam CT on treatment plan before surgical intervention of mandibular third molars and impact of radiographic factors on deciding on coronectomy vs surgical removal.

Authors:  L H Matzen; J Christensen; H Hintze; S Schou; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Audit of a 5-year radiographic protocol for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgical intervention.

Authors:  L H Matzen; S Schou; J Christensen; H Hintze; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Does 3-dimensional imaging of the third molar reduce the risk of experiencing inferior alveolar nerve injury owing to extraction?: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adrià Clé-Ovejero; Alba Sánchez-Torres; Octavi Camps-Font; Cosme Gay-Escoda; Rui Figueiredo; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 6.  Sensory nerve impairment following mandibular third molar surgery.

Authors:  A B Bataineh
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 7.  Incidence of nerve damage following third molar removal: a West of Scotland Oral Surgery Research Group study.

Authors:  F A Carmichael; D A McGowan
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.651

8.  A randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the incidence of injury to the inferior alveolar nerve as a result of coronectomy and removal of mandibular third molars.

Authors:  T Renton; M Hankins; C Sproate; M McGurk
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.651

9.  Clinical relevance of cone beam computed tomography in mandibular third molar removal: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  H Ghaeminia; N L Gerlach; Th J M Hoppenreijs; M Kicken; J P Dings; W A Borstlap; T de Haan; S J Bergé; G J Meijer; T J Maal
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.078

10.  Safety of coronectomy versus excision of wisdom teeth: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yiu Yan Leung; Lim K Cheung
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-09-26
View more
  3 in total

1.  Knowledge and Attitude Among the Saudi Dentists Towards Coronectomy of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.

Authors:  Nasser Raqe Alqhtani; Sarah Mohammed AlThobaiti; Hayat Khalid AlOwais; Muneera Abdulrhman Alabdulkarim; Reef Abdullah Aldossary; Nafeesa Tabassum; Mohammed AlOtaibi; Asma Almeslet
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2022-05-12

2.  Can diagnostic changes caused by cone beam computed tomography alter the clinical decision in impacted lower third molar treatment plan?

Authors:  Lucas Moreira Mendonça; Hugo Gaêta-Araujo; Pedro Bastos Cruvinel; Ingrid Wenzel Tosin; Marcelo Rodrigues Azenha; Emanuela Prado Ferraz; Christiano Oliveira-Santos; Camila Tirapelli
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Indications of the extraction of symptomatic impacted third molars. A systematic review.

Authors:  María Peñarrocha-Diago; Octavi Camps-Font; Alba Sánchez-Torres; Rui Figueiredo; María-Angeles Sánchez-Garcés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-03-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.