Literature DB >> 26645531

Shared Decision Making and Choice for Elective Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.

Emily F Boss1, Nishchay Mehta2, Neeraja Nagarajan3, Anne Links4, James R Benke4, Zackary Berger5, Ali Espinel6, Jeremy Meier6, Ellen A Lipstein7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Shared decision making (SDM), an integrative patient-provider communication process emphasizing discussion of scientific evidence and patient/family values, may improve quality care delivery, promote evidence-based practice, and reduce overuse of surgical care. Little is known, however, regarding SDM in elective surgical practice. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize findings of studies evaluating use and outcomes of SDM in elective surgery. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS electronic databases. REVIEW
METHODS: We searched for English-language studies (January 1, 1990, to August 9, 2015) evaluating use of SDM in elective surgical care where choice for surgery could be ascertained. Identified studies were independently screened by 2 reviewers in stages of title/abstract and full-text review. We abstracted data related to population, study design, clinical dilemma, use of SDM, outcomes, treatment choice, and bias.
RESULTS: Of 10,929 identified articles, 24 met inclusion criteria. The most common area studied was spine (7 of 24), followed by joint (5 of 24) and gynecologic surgery (4 of 24). Twenty studies used decision aids or support tools, including modalities that were multimedia/video (13 of 20), written (3 of 20), or personal coaching (4 of 20). Effect of SDM on preference for surgery was mixed across studies, showing a decrease in surgery (9 of 24), no difference (8 of 24), or an increase (1 of 24). SDM tended to improve decision quality (3 of 3) as well as knowledge or preparation (4 of 6) while decreasing decision conflict (4 of 6).
CONCLUSION: SDM reduces decision conflict and improves decision quality for patients making choices about elective surgery. While net findings show that SDM may influence patients to choose surgery less often, the impact of SDM on surgical utilization cannot be clearly ascertained. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision aid; decision support tool; elective surgery; informed decision making; shared decision-making; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645531      PMCID: PMC4857133          DOI: 10.1177/0194599815620558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  46 in total

1.  Medscape's response to the Institute of Medicine Report: Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century.

Authors:  M Leavitt
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2001-03-05

2.  Effects of decision aids for menorrhagia on treatment choices, health outcomes, and costs: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrew D M Kennedy; Mark J Sculpher; Angela Coulter; Nuala Dwyer; Margaret Rees; Keith R Abrams; Susan Horsley; Deborah Cowley; Christine Kidson; Catherine Kirwin; Caroline Naish; Gordon Stirrat
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program.

Authors:  E A Phelan; R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; J N Weinstein; M A Ciol; W Kreuter; J F Howe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  An interactive videodisc program for low back pain patients.

Authors:  B S Spunt; R A Deyo; V M Taylor; K M Leek; H I Goldberg; A G Mulley
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1996-12

5.  Involving patients in clinical decisions: impact of an interactive video program on use of back surgery.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; J Weinstein; J Howe; M Ciol; A G Mulley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 6.  Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas; Ann Barry Flood
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Pilot trial of telemedicine as a decision aid for patients with chronic wounds.

Authors:  Marek K Dobke; Dhaval Bhavsar; Amanda Gosman; Joan De Neve; Brian De Neve
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.536

8.  Treatment decisions about lumbar herniated disk in a shared decision-making program.

Authors:  Paul H Barrett; Arne Beck; Kristie Schmid; Bruce Fireman; Jonathan Betz Brown
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  2002-05

Review 9.  Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status.

Authors:  E A G Joosten; L DeFuentes-Merillas; G H de Weert; T Sensky; C P F van der Staak; C A J de Jong
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 17.659

10.  Impact of patient information booklet on treatment decision--a randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation.

Authors:  Sirkku Vuorma; Pekka Rissanen; Anna-Mari Aalto; Ritva Hurskainen; Erkki Kujansuu; Juha Teperi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  39 in total

1.  Individualized Patient Vocal Priorities for Tailored Therapy.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Tobias Riede; Anil Palaparthi; Linda S Hynan; Amy Hamilton; Laura Toles; Ted Mau
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Checkpoints to Progression: Qualitative Analysis of the Personal and Contextual Factors That Influence Selection of Upper Extremity Reconstruction Among Patients With Tetraplegia.

Authors:  Chelsea A Harris; John-Michael Muller; Melissa J Shauver; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Patient Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Not All Decisions Should Be Shared.

Authors:  Sarah E Lindsay; Aaron Alokozai; Sara L Eppler; Paige Fox; Catherine Curtin; Michael Gardner; Raffi Avedian; Ariel Palanca; Geoffrey D Abrams; Ivan Cheng; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 4.  Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives.

Authors:  Ana Wilson; Sean M Ronnekleiv-Kelly; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Physical Therapists and Physicians Evaluate Nonarthritic Hip Disease Differently: Results From a National Survey.

Authors:  Lindsey Brown-Taylor; Andrew Lynch; Randi Foraker; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Bryant Walrod; W Kelton Vasileff; Kathryn Glaws; Stephanie Di Stasi
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2020-06-23

6.  Reduced Elective Operation Rates and High Patient Satisfaction After the Implementation of Decision Aids in Patients with Gallstones or an Inguinal Hernia.

Authors:  Carmen S S Latenstein; Bob J van Wely; Mieke Klerkx; Marjan J Meinders; Bastiaan Thomeer; Philip R de Reuver
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Evaluation of Parental Perspectives and Concerns About Pediatric Tonsillectomy in Social Media.

Authors:  Tai Kyung Hairston; Anne R Links; Vandra Harris; David E Tunkel; Jonathan Walsh; Mary Catherine Beach; Emily F Boss
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

8.  Parent Experience of Care and Decision Making for Children Who Snore.

Authors:  Emily F Boss; Anne R Links; Ron Saxton; Tina L Cheng; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Sarah E Lillie; Dana L Alden; Laura Scherer; Megan Oser; Christine Rini; Miho Tanaka; John Baleix; Mikki Brewster; Simon Craddock Lee; Mary K Goldstein; Robert M Jacobson; Ronald E Myers; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-26

10.  Multifactor Influences of Shared Decision-Making in Acoustic Neuroma Treatment.

Authors:  Jason C Nellis; Jeff D Sharon; Seth E Pross; Lisa E Ishii; Masaru Ishii; Jacob K Dey; Howard W Francis
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.311

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.