Literature DB >> 27930442

Multifactor Influences of Shared Decision-Making in Acoustic Neuroma Treatment.

Jason C Nellis1, Jeff D Sharon, Seth E Pross, Lisa E Ishii, Masaru Ishii, Jacob K Dey, Howard W Francis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with treatment modality selection in acoustic neuromas. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective observational study.
SETTING: Tertiary care neurotology clinic. PATIENTS: Data were prospectively collected from patients initially presenting to a tertiary care neurotology clinic between 2013 and 2016. Patients who did not have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), demographic, psychometric, or audiometric data were excluded from analysis. INTERVENTION: Demographic information, clinical symptoms, tumor characteristics, and psychometric data were collected to determine factors associated with undergoing acoustic neuroma surgical resection using univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The decision to pursue acoustic neuroma surgical resection versus active surveillance.
RESULTS: A total of 216 patients with acoustic neuroma (mean age 55 years, 58% women) were included. Ninety eight patients (45.4%) pursued surgical resection, 118 patients (54.6%) pursued active surveillance. Surgical treatment was significantly associated with patient age less than 65, higher grade tumors, growing tumors, larger volume tumors, lower word discrimination scores, Class D hearing, headache, and vertigo as presenting symptoms, higher number of total symptoms, and higher headache severity scores (p < 0.05). There was no significant association between surgical intervention and preoperative quality of life, depression, and self-esteem scores. On multiple logistic regression analysis, the likelihood of undergoing surgical resection significantly decreased for patients older than age 65 (odds ratio [OR] 0.19; 0.05-0.69) and increased in patients with medium (OR 4.34; 1.36-13.81), moderately large (OR 33.47; 5.72-195.83), large grade tumors (OR 56.63; 4.02-518.93), tumor growth present (OR 4.51; 1.66-12.28), Class D hearing (OR 3.96; 1.29-12.16), and higher headache severity scores (OR 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05). The likelihood of undergoing surgical resection was completely predictive for giant grade tumors and not significant for small grade tumors and Class B or C hearing.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-elderly acoustic neuroma patients with larger tumors, growing tumors, significant hearing loss, and worse headaches are more likely to pursue surgical resection rather than active surveillance. Psychological factors such as quality of life, depression, and self-esteem do not seem to influence decision-making in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27930442      PMCID: PMC5303176          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  50 in total

1.  The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: translation and validation in university students.

Authors:  José Martín-Albo; Juan L Núñiez; José G Navarro; Fernando Grijalvo
Journal:  Span J Psychol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.264

2.  Decision making in acoustic neuroma management: the only hearing ear.

Authors:  M B Naguib; E Saleh; M Aristegui; A Mazzoni; M Sanna
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1994

3.  Headache: a quality of life analysis in a cohort of 1,657 patients undergoing acoustic neuroma surgery, results from the acoustic neuroma association.

Authors:  John Martin Ryzenman; Myles L Pensak; John M Tew
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Acoustic tumor growth: implications for treatment choices.

Authors:  M J Fucci; C A Buchman; D E Brackmann; K I Berliner
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-07

5.  Facial nerve function after vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Maurizio Falcioni; Paolo Fois; Abdelkader Taibah; Mario Sanna
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Current epidemiology and management trends in acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  Thomas J Gal; Jennifer Shinn; Bin Huang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  The New Era of Informed Consent: Getting to a Reasonable-Patient Standard Through Shared Decision Making.

Authors:  Erica S Spatz; Harlan M Krumholz; Benjamin W Moulton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The prevalence and clinical course of patients with 'incidental' acoustic neuromas.

Authors:  Anita Jeyakumar; Rahul Seth; Todd M Brickman; Paul Dutcher
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Management of acoustic neuromas in patients 65 years or older.

Authors:  Pamela C Roehm; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma). American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, INC.

Authors: 
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  4 in total

1.  Individualized Patient Vocal Priorities for Tailored Therapy.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Tobias Riede; Anil Palaparthi; Linda S Hynan; Amy Hamilton; Laura Toles; Ted Mau
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Patient quality of life after vestibular schwannoma removal: possibilities and limits to measuring different domains of patients' wellbeing.

Authors:  Julia Kristin; Marcel Fabian Glaas; Jörg Schipper; Thomas Klenzner; Katrin Eysel-Gosepath; Philipp Jansen; Matthias Franz; Ralf Schäfer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Shared decision-making in neurosurgery: a scoping review.

Authors:  Alba Corell; Annie Guo; Tomás Gómez Vecchio; Anneli Ozanne; Asgeir S Jakola
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Patient-reported factors that influence the vestibular schwannoma treatment decision: a qualitative study.

Authors:  O M Neve; G Soulier; M Hendriksma; A G L van der Mey; A van Linge; P P G van Benthem; E F Hensen; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.