Literature DB >> 26645296

The importance of intramedullary hip nail positioning during implantation for stable pertrochanteric fractures: biomechanical analysis.

Radek Bartoska1, Vaclav Baca2,3,4, Zdenek Horak5,6, Maros Hrubina7, Jiri Skala-Rosenbaum1, Jiri Marvan1, David Kachlik5,8, Valer Dzupa1,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Proximal femoral fractures are among the most commonly sustained fractures. The current treatment of stable proximal femoral fractures located in trochanteric region primarily involves the use of two systems: extramedullary dynamic hip screws and intramedullary hip nails. Given that these fractures are mainly found in the elderly population, the necessity of a repeat, due to failure of the first, may jeopardize the patient's life. Decisive factors contributing to the healing of a fracture (or the failure thereof) include fracture pattern, technical implementation of the operation (i.e., position of the implant), implant's properties and its changes in relation to the surrounding bone tissue during loading. Each screw insertion variant results in damage to various load-bearing bone structures, which can be expected to influence healing quality and stability of newly formed bone.
METHOD: With the aid of a numerical model and finite element methods, the authors analyzed several different positions of IMHN/PFH-nails in the proximal femur, with the objective of determining positions with an increased risk of failure. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: In model situations, it has been shown that in stable fractures results do not depend on absolutely precise positioning and small deflections in the nails and neck screws positions do not significantly increase the risk of failure for the entire fixation. Damage to load-bearing structures relative to various implant placements does not impact the resultant overall fixation stability. Therefore, it is not necessary to re-introduce implants in the ideal position, which can lead to reduced patient radiation doses during surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone fixation; Complications; Finite element method analyses; Intramedullary hip nail; Stable pertrochanteric fracture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26645296     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-015-1595-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  26 in total

1.  Clinical comparison of the second and third generation of intramedullary devices for trochanteric fractures of the hip--Blade vs screw.

Authors:  Andreas Lenich; Helen Vester; Michael Nerlich; Edgar Mayr; Ulrich Stöckle; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Patient-specific finite element analysis of the human femur--a double-blinded biomechanical validation.

Authors:  Nir Trabelsi; Zohar Yosibash; Christof Wutte; Peter Augat; Sebastian Eberle
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses.

Authors:  Vaclav Baca; Zdenek Horak; Petr Mikulenka; Valer Dzupa
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Single-centre study of hip fractures in Prague, Czech Republic, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Jiří Skála-Rosenbaum; Jan Bartoníček; Daniel Ríha; Petr Waldauf; Valér Džupa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone.

Authors:  T S Keller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The correlation between muscles insertions and topography of break lines in pertrochanteric fractures: a comprehensive anatomical approach of complex proximal femur injuries.

Authors:  Radek Bartoska; Vaclav Baca; David Kachlik; Jiri Marvan; Valer Dzupa
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail.

Authors:  Beatrix Hesse; Andrè Gächter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  [Trochanteric femoral fractures].

Authors:  P Douša; O Čech; M Weissinger; V Džupa
Journal:  Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.531

9.  Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?

Authors:  Jirí Skála-Rosenbaum; Jan Bartonícek; Radek Bartoska
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures in elderly men and women: Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study.

Authors:  Kevin P Chang; Jacqueline R Center; Tuan V Nguyen; John A Eisman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-01-05       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of tip-apex distance and femoral head lag screw position on treatment outcomes of unstable intertrochanteric fractures using cephalomedullary nails.

Authors:  Cheng-Hung Lee; Kuo-Chih Su; Kun-Hui Chen; Chien-Chou Pan; Yun-Che Wu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Effect of femoral head necrosis cystic area on femoral head collapse and stress distribution in femoral head: A clinical and finite element study.

Authors:  Zhaoming Zhang; Tianye Lin; Yuan Zhong; Wenting Song; Peng Yang; Ding Wang; Fan Yang; Qingwen Zhang; Qiushi Wei; Wei He
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-07-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.