Literature DB >> 15517321

Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail.

Beatrix Hesse1, Andrè Gächter.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of trochanteric fractures with the use of gamma nails has become an established method. Despite the good and reliable results, some typical failures and complications may occur. It was our purpose to analyse the most common complications and their treatment options.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 498 patients were treated with a gamma nail from January 1992 until December 2001. There were 77% pertrochanteric, 10% subtrochanteric, 11% reversed pertrochanteric and 2% lateral femoral neck fractures. The patients' mean age was 78.6 years (ranging from 29 to 98 years).
RESULTS: There were a total of 78 general complications (16%) and implant-related complications in 8% (n=42). The most common complication was trochanteric pain necessitating removal of the gamma nail (n=30). Four patients fell after removal of the nail and sustained a neck fracture on the same side. Cut-out of the screw occurred in 19 patients. Sixteen of them had to be converted to a total hip replacement. Another 5 patients were converted to a total hip replacement because of pseudoarthrosis. During conversion to total hip replacements, the trochanter major refixation and length adjustment were the most problematic steps (intra- or postoperative dislocations necessitating anti-dislocation rings in three cases). Furthermore, cement extrusion at the femur and acetabulum occurred in 13 cases. Infections occurred in 3 patients. Five patients with a short gamma nail needed a conversion to a long gamma nail due to pseudoarthrosis (n=2) or femur fracture at the distal interlocking bolt (n=3). In addition, 7 patients sustained a distal femur fracture through the distal bolt, necessitating a plate osteosynthesis.
CONCLUSION: Most complications after gamma nail fixation can be prevented by following certain rules. The other inevitable problems can be dealt with either through a conversion to a total hip replacement, a re-osteosynthesis with a long gamma nail or an additional condylar plate. Conversion to total hip replacement may be a demanding operation with a higher than normal complication rate. Removal of the gamma nail should be performed cautiously as re-fractures can occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15517321     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-004-0744-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  35 in total

1.  [Medial dislocation of hip screw following internal fixation of a pertrochateric metastasis in the femur with gamma nails].

Authors:  U Horas; S Ernst
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Short versus long intramedullary nails for treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO 31-A1 and AO 31-A2): a systematic review.

Authors:  Pernille Bovbjerg; Lonnie Froberg; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-18

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of the risk of secondary fracture around short versus long cephalomedullary nails.

Authors:  William E Daner; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Ryan B Graves; Mark C Willis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-06-08

4.  3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre.

Authors:  Alicja J Bojan; Claudia Beimel; Andreas Speitling; Gilbert Taglang; Carl Ekholm; Anders Jönsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Comparison between locked and unlocked intramedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Auro Caraffa; Domenico Lupariello; Paolo Ceccarini; Giulio Gambaracci; Luigi Meccariello; Francesco Manfreda; Daniele Maiettini; Cristina Ibáñez Vicente; Michele Scialpi; Olga Bisaccia; Giuseppe Rinonapoli; Michele Bisaccia
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-09

6.  A simple reproducible technique for the retrieval of broken proximal femoral blades, a technical note and review of literature.

Authors:  Mohamed A Imam; Ziad Harb; David Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-13

7.  Loss of offset after pertrochanteric hip fractures affects hip function one year after surgery with a short intramedullary nail. A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Max Gordon; Per-Olov Berntsson; Erik Sjölund; Yilmaz Demir; Carl Johan Hedbeck; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures--a prospective comparative randomized study.

Authors:  Xing Li; Liping Zhang; Zhiyong Hou; Zhao Meng; Wei Chen; Pengcheng Wang; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?

Authors:  Jirí Skála-Rosenbaum; Jan Bartonícek; Radek Bartoska
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Failed Basicervical Hip Fracture Fixation: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Vineet Tyagi; Oluwaseun Akinbo
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.