| Literature DB >> 26637242 |
Jan Keller1, Tanja Eva-Maria Kaltenbach2, Mark Martin Haenle3, Suemeyra Oeztuerk4, Tilmann Graeter5, Richard Andrew Mason6, Thomas Seufferlein7, Wolfgang Kratzer8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Objective of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of novel ultrasonographic modalities in comparison with simultaneously performed liver biopsy.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26637242 PMCID: PMC4670544 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-015-0100-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Overview of the subject collective and individual measurement parameters
| N (%); mean ± STD | |
|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 51 |
| Gender | |
| Male | 31 (61 %) |
| Female | 20 (39 %) |
| Age (years) | 51 ± 11 |
| Weight (kg) | 75 ± 14 |
| Height (m) | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.5 ± 3.5 |
| Hepatopathies | |
| Hepatitis C | 13 (25 %) |
| Hepatitis B | 5 (10 %) |
| Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) | 10 (20 %) |
| Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) | 6 (12 %) |
| Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) | 5 (10 %) |
| Toxic liver damage | 3 (6 %) |
| Other and Unknown | 9 (17 %) |
| Fibrosis stage (Desmet/Scheuer) | |
| Stage F0 | 15 (32 %) |
| Stage F1 | 10 (21 %) |
| Stage F2 | 13 (28 %) |
| Stage F3 and F4 | 9 (19 %) |
| Tissue cylinder | |
| Length (cm) | 1.8 ± 0.6 |
| Portal tracts | 7 ± 3 |
| Hepatocytes with lipid inclusions | |
| Grade 0: <5 % | 34 (67 %) |
| Grade 1: 5–30 % | 10 (20 %) |
| Grade 2: >30 % | 7 (13 %) |
Overview of the measured parameters with VTTQ (Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification), VTIQ (Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging & Quantification) and ASQ (Acoustic Structure Quantification). Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney-test was used to differentiate the groups. The level of significance was set to α = 0.05
| Fibrosis stage | Mean ± STD | Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney-test against fibrosis stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F2 | F3 and F4 | |||
| VTTQ righ liver lobe, 5 cm deep | Shearwave velocity [m/s] | ||||
| F0 | 1.37 ± 0.37 |
|
|
| |
| F1 | 1.37 ± 0.26 | --- |
|
| |
| F2 | 1.62 ± 0.81 |
| --- |
| |
| F3 and F4 | 2.61 ± 0.73 |
|
| --- | |
| VTIQ right liver lobe, 1.5 cm under liver capsule | Shearwave velocity [m/s] | ||||
| F0 | 1.91 ± 0.44 |
|
|
| |
| F1 | 1.64 ± 0.27 | --- |
|
| |
| F2 | 1.97 ± 0.39 |
| --- |
| |
| F3 and F4 | 2.42 ± 0.58 |
|
| --- | |
| ASQ right liver lobe, longitudinal section | Focal Disturbance - Ratio | ||||
| F0 | 0.18 ± 0.13 |
|
|
| |
| F1 | 0.19 ± 0.16 | --- |
|
| |
| F2 | 0.17 ± 0.17 |
| --- |
| |
| F3 and F4 | 0.17 ± 0.19 |
|
| --- | |
Fig. 1Focal Disturbance (FD) Ratio of liver cross sections grouped according to the respective steatosis grade measured using Acoustic Structure Quantification (ASQ). Grade 0: < 5 % of hepatocytes with lipid inclusions, Grade 2: 5–30 %, Grade 3: >30 %
“Area Under the Curve” (AUC) values calculated from a Reciever Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve for differentiation of the individual fibrosis stages according to Desmet and Scheuer based on measured shear wave velocities
| Fibrosis stage | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage F1 | Stage F2 | Stage > F2 | ||
| VTTQ | AUC (95 %-CI) | 0.55 (0.34–0.75) | 0.65 (0.47–0.79) | 0.94 (0.84–0.99) |
| Cut Off (Sensitivity/Specificity) | 1.21 m/s (80 %/40 %) | 1.36 m/s (77 %/56 %) | 1.66 m/s (100 %/84 %) | |
| VTIQ 15 mm depth Left hepatic lobe | AUC (95 %-CI) | - | - | 0.82 (0.67–0.92) |
| Cut Off (Sensitivity/Specificity) | - | - | 1.90 m/s (83 %/65 %) | |
| VTIQ 15 mm depth Right hepatic lobe | AUC (95 %-CI) | - | - | 0.84 (0.70–0.93) |
| Cut Off (Sensitivity/Specificity) | - | - | 1.82 m/s (100 %/58 %) | |
| VTIQ 20 mm depth Right hepatic lobe | AUC (95 %-CI) | - | - | 0.87 (0.73–0.95) |
| Cut Off (Sensitivity/Specificity) | - | - | 1.60 m/s (100 %/62 %) | |
VTTQ Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification, VTIQ Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging & Quantification, CI Confidence Interval
Fig. 2Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve for differentiation of the individual fibrosis stages according to Desmet and Scheuer based on the corresponding shear wave velocities. AUC: Area Under the Curve; 95 %-CI: 95 % Confidence Interval