Literature DB >> 26632411

The Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in the Era of Robotic Surgery.

Jae Young Kim1, Won Shik Kim2, Eun Chang Choi3, Woong Nam1,4.   

Abstract

Among various surgical methods introduced to optimize esthetic results, robotic surgery has gradually expanded in scope. As incision, approach, and operation view in robotic surgery differ from existing surgical methods, we should consider reconstruction from a different perspective. We recently experienced two mandibular reconstruction cases after tumor ablative surgery with robotic neck dissection using the conventional reconstruction method and virtual surgical planning (VSP), respectively. We found that the conventional reconstruction method is inappropriate in modified facelift incision in robotic neck dissection because it provides limited surgical scope, restricts access to the defect area, and therefore, consumes considerable time before anastomosis. For these reasons, the authors consider VSP far more viable in the era of robotic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rhytidoplasty; mandibular reconstruction; microsurgery; virtual surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26632411      PMCID: PMC4696964          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  13 in total

1.  Mandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative virtual surgical simulation.

Authors:  Guang-sen Zheng; Yu-xiong Su; Gui-qing Liao; Zhuo-fan Chen; Lin Wang; Pei-feng Jiao; Hai-chao Liu; Yun-qi Zhong; Tong-han Zhang; Yu-jie Liang
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2011-08-19

2.  Computer-assisted surgical planning and simulation for condylar reconstruction in patients with osteochondroma.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Yang; Jing Hu; Songsong Zhu; Xinhua Liang; Jihua Li; En Luo
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Facelift approach for mandibular resection and reconstruction.

Authors:  Bernardo Bianchi; Andrea Ferri; Silvano Ferrari; Chiara Copelli; Enrico Sesenna
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Cost-effectiveness analysis for computer-aided surgical simulation in complex cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  James J Xia; Carl V Phillips; Jaime Gateno; John F Teichgraeber; Andrew M Christensen; Michael J Gliddon; Jeremy J Lemoine; Michael A K Liebschner
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Application of virtual surgical planning with computer assisted design and manufacturing technology to cranio-maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Linping Zhao; Pravin K Patel; Mimis Cohen
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-07-13

Review 6.  What makes a good flap go bad? A critical analysis of the literature of intraoperative factors related to free flap failure.

Authors:  Kavita M Pattani; Patrick Byrne; Kofi Boahene; Jeremy Richmon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Analysis of risk factors associated with microvascular free flap failure using a multi-institutional database.

Authors:  Alex K Wong; T Joanna Nguyen; Mirna Peric; Ahva Shahabi; Evan N Vidar; Brian H Hwang; Solmaz Niknam Leilabadi; Linda S Chan; Mark M Urata
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.425

8.  Mandibular reconstruction using intraoral microvascular anastomosis following removal of an ameloblastoma.

Authors:  Emeka Nkenke; Abbas Agaimy; Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Stefan Eitner
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Comprehensive Evaluation of Risk Factors and Management of Impending Flap Loss in 2138 Breast Free Flaps.

Authors:  Edward I Chang; Eric I Chang; Miguel A Soto-Miranda; Hong Zhang; Naveed Nosrati; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece; Geoffrey L Robb; David W Chang
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Esthetic neck dissection using an endoscope via retroauricular incision: a report of two cases.

Authors:  Jae-Young Kim; Hoon Cho; In-Ho Cha; Woong Nam
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-02-25
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Robotic surgical systems in maxillofacial surgery: a review.

Authors:  Hang-Hang Liu; Long-Jiang Li; Bin Shi; Chun-Wei Xu; En Luo
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.344

2.  Robot-assisted submandibular gland excision via modified facelift incision.

Authors:  Seung Wook Jung; Young Kwan Kim; Yong Hoon Cha; Yoon Woo Koh; Woong Nam
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-09-05

3.  Is There Room for Microsurgery in Robotic Surgery?

Authors:  Jefferson Braga Silva; Catarina Vellinho Busnello; Matheus Ribeiro Cesarino; Luiza Fernandes Xavier; Leandro Totti Cavazzola
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-05-16

Review 4.  Application of computer-assisted surgery techniques in the management of zygomatic complex fractures.

Authors:  Xiao Zhang; Chao-Ying Han; Min-Jia Dai; Jin-Long Chen; Xiao-Hui Zheng; Jie Long; Wei Tang; Wei-Dong Tian; Lei Liu
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2018-09-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.