Literature DB >> 25003429

Comprehensive Evaluation of Risk Factors and Management of Impending Flap Loss in 2138 Breast Free Flaps.

Edward I Chang1, Eric I Chang, Miguel A Soto-Miranda, Hong Zhang, Naveed Nosrati, Melissa A Crosby, Gregory P Reece, Geoffrey L Robb, David W Chang.   

Abstract

Loss of a breast free flap is a relatively rare but catastrophic occurrence. Our study aims to identify risk factors for flap loss and to assess whether different salvage techniques affect flap salvage. We performed a retrospective review of all breast free flaps performed at a single institution from 2000 to 2010. Overall, 2138 flaps were performed in 1608 patients (unilateral, 1120 and bilateral, 488) with 44 flap losses (2.1%). Age, body mass index, smoking, radiation, chemotherapy, and surgeon experience did not affect flap loss. Abdominal flaps based on a single perforator were at significantly higher risk for flap loss compared with flaps based on multiple perforators (P = 0.0007). Subgroup analysis of the subset of 166 compromised free flaps (flaps requiring a return to the operating room, an intraoperative anastomotic revision, or loss/partial loss of a free flap) demonstrated deep inferior epigastric perforator, and other flaps (superficial inferior epigastric artery and superior gluteal artery perforator) were significantly associated with flap loss [odds ratio (OR) 5.20; P = 0.03 and OR 6.91; P = 0.0004, respectively] compared with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. Although an intraoperative complication was not associated with a flap loss, the need for a reoperation was strongly predictive (P < 0.0001). Flap salvage was the highest within the first 24 hours (83.7%) and significantly less between days 1 and 3 (38.6%; P < 0.0001) and beyond 4 days (29.4%; P < 0.0001). Longer ischemia time was significantly associated with flap loss (P = 0.04). Salvage techniques (aspirin, heparinzation, thrombectomy, and thrombolytic) had no impact on flap salvage rates. Heparinization and thrombolytics were associated with higher loss rates (OR 3.40; P = 0.003 and OR 10.36; P < 0.0001, respectively). Free flap loss following breast reconstruction is multifactorial with higher losses in superficial inferior epigastric artery and gluteal flaps, single-perforator abdominal flaps, and longer ischemia times. Salvage rates are most successful within the first 24 hours, and the use of heparinization, aspirin, and thrombolytics does not improve salvage rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25003429     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  21 in total

1.  Acute choke zone effects: Lessons from radioactive and fluorescent microspheres in a pig model muscle flap.

Authors:  D J Courtemanche; W G Cannon; Rjm Courtemanche; J S Williamson; D Lyster
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 2.  Breast Reconstruction Following Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Bernd Gerber; Mario Marx; Michael Untch; Andree Faridi
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Peri-operative risk factors for complications of free flaps in traumatic wounds - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Raquel Bernardelli Iamaguchi; Renan Lyuji Takemura; Gustavo Bersani Silva; Jairo Andre de Oliveira Alves; Luciano Ruiz Torres; Alvaro Baik Cho; Teng Hsiang Wei; Marcelo Rosa de Rezende; Rames Mattar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Combined deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap with vascularized groin lymph node transplant for treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Authors:  Mark V Schaverien; Edward I Chang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  Anterograde Injection of Alteplase Salvages Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap in Reconstructive Breast Surgery.

Authors:  Julia M Wimbauer; Klemens M Heinrich; Karl Schwaiger; Peter Pumberger; Fabian Koeninger; Gottfried Wechselberger; Elisabeth Russe
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-20

Review 6.  Morbidity of the Donor Site and Complication Rates of Breast Reconstruction with Autologous Abdominal Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hatan Mortada; Taif Fawaz AlNojaidi; Razan AlRabah; Yousif Almohammadi; Raghad AlKhashan; Hattan Aljaaly
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 2.269

7.  The Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in the Era of Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Jae Young Kim; Won Shik Kim; Eun Chang Choi; Woong Nam
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Successful Salvage of Delayed Venous Congestion After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristopher Katira; Samita Goyal; Chelsea Venditto; John A LoGiudice; Erin L Doren
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2019-12-03

Review 9.  Combining Autologous Breast Reconstruction and Vascularized Lymph Node Transfer.

Authors:  Edward I Chang; Jaume Masià; Mark L Smith
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 2.314

10.  Patient-Reported Satisfaction after Prophylactic Operations of the Breast.

Authors:  Katja Keller; Cornelia Meisel; Nannette Grübling; Andrea Petzold; Pauline Wimberger; Karin Kast
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.