Tina D Hoang1, Jared Reis2, Na Zhu3, David R Jacobs3, Lenore J Launer4, Rachel A Whitmer5, Stephen Sidney5, Kristine Yaffe6. 1. Northern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco. 2. Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 4. Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry, National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, Maryland. 5. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland. 6. Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco7San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Sedentary behaviors and physical inactivity are not only increasing worldwide but also are critical risk factors for adverse health outcomes. Yet, few studies have examined the effects of sedentary behavior on cognition or the long-term role of either behavior in early to middle adulthood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between 25-year patterns of television viewing and physical activity and midlife cognition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study of 3247 adults (black and white races; aged 18-30 years) enrolled in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study (March 25, 1985, to August 31, 2011). Data analysis was performed June 1, 2014, through April 15, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We assessed television viewing and physical activity at repeated visits (≥3 assessments) over 25 years using a validated questionnaire. A 25-year pattern of high television viewing was defined as watching TV above the upper baseline quartile (>3 hours/d) for more than two-thirds of the visits, and a 25-year pattern of low physical activity was defined as activity levels below the lower, sex-specific baseline quartile for more than two-thirds of the of the visits. We evaluated cognitive function at year 25 using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Stroop test, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean (SD) age of the 3247 study participants was 25.1 (3.6) years, 1836 (56.5%) were female, 1771 (54.5%) were white, and 3015 (92.9%) had completed at least high school. Compared with participants with low television viewing, those with high television viewing during 25 years (353 of 3247 [10.9%]) were more likely to have poor cognitive performance (<1 SD below the race-specific mean) on the DSST and Stroop test, with findings reported as adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): DSST, 1.64 (1.21-2.23) and Stroop test, 1.56 (1.13-2.14), but not the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, adjusted for age, race, sex, educational level, smoking, alcohol use, body mass index, and hypertension. Low physical activity during 25 years in 528 of 3247 participants (16.3%) was significantly associated with poor performance on the DSST, 1.47 (1.14-1.90). Compared with participants with low television viewing and high physical activity, the odds of poor performance were almost 2 times higher for adults with both high television viewing and low physical activity in 107 of 3247 (3.3%) (DSST, 1.95 [1.19-3.22], and Stroop test, 2.20 [1.36-3.56]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High television viewing and low physical activity in early adulthood were associated with worse midlife executive function and processing speed. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate that these risk behaviors may be critical targets for prevention of cognitive aging even before middle age.
IMPORTANCE: Sedentary behaviors and physical inactivity are not only increasing worldwide but also are critical risk factors for adverse health outcomes. Yet, few studies have examined the effects of sedentary behavior on cognition or the long-term role of either behavior in early to middle adulthood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between 25-year patterns of television viewing and physical activity and midlife cognition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective study of 3247 adults (black and white races; aged 18-30 years) enrolled in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study (March 25, 1985, to August 31, 2011). Data analysis was performed June 1, 2014, through April 15, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We assessed television viewing and physical activity at repeated visits (≥3 assessments) over 25 years using a validated questionnaire. A 25-year pattern of high television viewing was defined as watching TV above the upper baseline quartile (>3 hours/d) for more than two-thirds of the visits, and a 25-year pattern of low physical activity was defined as activity levels below the lower, sex-specific baseline quartile for more than two-thirds of the of the visits. We evaluated cognitive function at year 25 using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), Stroop test, and Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean (SD) age of the 3247 study participants was 25.1 (3.6) years, 1836 (56.5%) were female, 1771 (54.5%) were white, and 3015 (92.9%) had completed at least high school. Compared with participants with low television viewing, those with high television viewing during 25 years (353 of 3247 [10.9%]) were more likely to have poor cognitive performance (<1 SD below the race-specific mean) on the DSST and Stroop test, with findings reported as adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): DSST, 1.64 (1.21-2.23) and Stroop test, 1.56 (1.13-2.14), but not the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, adjusted for age, race, sex, educational level, smoking, alcohol use, body mass index, and hypertension. Low physical activity during 25 years in 528 of 3247 participants (16.3%) was significantly associated with poor performance on the DSST, 1.47 (1.14-1.90). Compared with participants with low television viewing and high physical activity, the odds of poor performance were almost 2 times higher for adults with both high television viewing and low physical activity in 107 of 3247 (3.3%) (DSST, 1.95 [1.19-3.22], and Stroop test, 2.20 [1.36-3.56]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: High television viewing and low physical activity in early adulthood were associated with worse midlife executive function and processing speed. This is one of the first studies to demonstrate that these risk behaviors may be critical targets for prevention of cognitive aging even before middle age.
Authors: Charles H Hillman; Robert W Motl; Matthew B Pontifex; Danielle Posthuma; Janine H Stubbe; Dorret I Boomsma; Eco J C de Geus Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Heather A Lindstrom; Thomas Fritsch; Grace Petot; Kathleen A Smyth; Chien H Chen; Sara M Debanne; Alan J Lerner; Robert P Friedland Journal: Brain Cogn Date: 2004-12-22 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Claire T McEvoy; Tina Hoang; Stephen Sidney; Lyn M Steffen; David R Jacobs; James M Shikany; John T Wilkins; Kristine Yaffe Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-03-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Raeanne C Moore; Christopher N Kaufmann; Alexandra S Rooney; David J Moore; Lisa T Eyler; Eric Granholm; Steven Paul Woods; Joel Swendsen; Robert K Heaton; J C Scott; Colin A Depp Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Wenfei Zhu; Virginia G Wadley; Virginia J Howard; Brent Hutto; Steven N Blair; Steven P Hooker Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: K B Casaletto; A M Staffaroni; A Wolf; B Appleby; D Brushaber; G Coppola; B Dickerson; K Domoto-Reilly; F M Elahi; J Fields; J C Fong; L Forsberg; N Ghoshal; N Graff-Radford; M Grossman; H W Heuer; G-Y Hsiung; E D Huey; D Irwin; K Kantarci; D Kaufer; D Kerwin; D Knopman; J Kornak; J H Kramer; I Litvan; I R Mackenzie; M Mendez; B Miller; R Rademakers; E M Ramos; K Rascovsky; E D Roberson; J A Syrjanen; M C Tartaglia; S Weintraub; B Boeve; A L Boxer; H Rosen; K Yaffe Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Emilie T Reas; Gail A Laughlin; Jaclyn Bergstrom; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Erin L Richard; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Linda K McEvoy Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Catherine R Marinac; Sandahl H Nelson; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Jacqueline Kerr; Loki Natarajan; Suneeta Godbole; Sheri J Hartman Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Amber L Bahorik; Stephen Sidney; Jonathan Kramer-Feldman; David R Jacobs; Amanda R Mathew; Jared P Reis; Kristine Yaffe Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Victoria Fleming; Brianna Piro-Gambetti; Austin Patrick; Matthew Zammit; Andrew Alexander; Bradley T Christian; Benjamin Handen; Annie Cohen; William Klunk; Charles Laymon; Beau M Ances; David T Plante; Ozioma Okonkwo; Sigan L Hartley Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Freda Patterson; Susan Kohl Malone; Michael A Grandner; Alicia Lozano; Mackenzie Perkett; Alexandra Hanlon Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.367