Literature DB >> 21460064

Locus of spatial attention determines inward-outward anisotropy in crowding.

Yury Petrov1, Olga Meleshkevich.   

Abstract

It has long been known that an outward mask is much more disruptive than an inward mask in crowding (H. Bouma, 1973). We show that the locus of attention strongly affects this inward-outward anisotropy, removing it in some conditions and reversing it in others. In a 2AFC paradigm, subjects identified whether a high-contrast Gabor target of a given orientation was presented left or right of fixation. When a fixed eccentricity (8°) was used, the outward plaid mask produced much stronger crowding than the inward mask. When 7°, 8°, and 9° eccentricities were interleaved within the same run, diffusing attention, the inward and outward masks produced the same amount of crowding for all three eccentricities. When target identification was contingent on a foveal cue, biasing attention inward, the inward mask produced stronger crowding. Finally, a new contrast-detection paradigm was used to demonstrate that attention is generally mislocalized outward of the target, which may explain the commonly observed anisotropy in crowding. Our results suggest that spatial attention is intimately involved in the mechanism of crowding.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21460064     DOI: 10.1167/11.4.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  21 in total

1.  The distribution of spatial attention changes with task demands during goal-directed reaching.

Authors:  Heidi Long; Anna Ma-Wyatt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A Unifying Model of Orientation Crowding in Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Broad attention uncovers benefits of stimulus uniformity in visual crowding.

Authors:  Koen Rummens; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Variations in crowding, saccadic precision, and spatial localization reveal the shared topology of spatial vision.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Martin Szinte; Bilge Sayim; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  E-readers are more effective than paper for some with dyslexia.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Chen Chen; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of crowding and attention on high-levels of motion processing and motion adaptation.

Authors:  Andrea Pavan; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Role of Feature Tracking in the Furrow Illusion.

Authors:  Rémy Allard; Jocelyn Faubert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Constraints on Letter-in-String Identification in Peripheral Vision: Effects of Number of Flankers and Deployment of Attention.

Authors:  Myriam Chanceaux; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-13

10.  Shorter lines facilitate reading in those who struggle.

Authors:  Matthew H Schneps; Jenny M Thomson; Gerhard Sonnert; Marc Pomplun; Chen Chen; Amanda Heffner-Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.