Literature DB >> 26625261

Predicting Mental Imagery-Based BCI Performance from Personality, Cognitive Profile and Neurophysiological Patterns.

Camille Jeunet1,2, Bernard N'Kaoua1, Sriram Subramanian3, Martin Hachet2, Fabien Lotte2.   

Abstract

Mental-Imagery based Brain-Computer Interfaces (MI-BCIs) allow their users to send commands to a computer using their brain-activity alone (typically measured by ElectroEncephaloGraphy-EEG), which is processed while they perform specific mental tasks. While very promising, MI-BCIs remain barely used outside laboratories because of the difficulty encountered by users to control them. Indeed, although some users obtain good control performances after training, a substantial proportion remains unable to reliably control an MI-BCI. This huge variability in user-performance led the community to look for predictors of MI-BCI control ability. However, these predictors were only explored for motor-imagery based BCIs, and mostly for a single training session per subject. In this study, 18 participants were instructed to learn to control an EEG-based MI-BCI by performing 3 MI-tasks, 2 of which were non-motor tasks, across 6 training sessions, on 6 different days. Relationships between the participants' BCI control performances and their personality, cognitive profile and neurophysiological markers were explored. While no relevant relationships with neurophysiological markers were found, strong correlations between MI-BCI performances and mental-rotation scores (reflecting spatial abilities) were revealed. Also, a predictive model of MI-BCI performance based on psychometric questionnaire scores was proposed. A leave-one-subject-out cross validation process revealed the stability and reliability of this model: it enabled to predict participants' performance with a mean error of less than 3 points. This study determined how users' profiles impact their MI-BCI control ability and thus clears the way for designing novel MI-BCI training protocols, adapted to the profile of each user.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26625261      PMCID: PMC4666487          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  33 in total

1.  Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement.

Authors:  H Ramoser; J Müller-Gerking; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng       Date:  2000-12

Review 2.  Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.

Authors:  Jonathan R Wolpaw; Niels Birbaumer; Dennis J McFarland; Gert Pfurtscheller; Theresa M Vaughan
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?

Authors:  C Guger; G Edlinger; W Harkam; I Niedermayer; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  High γ-power predicts performance in sensorimotor-rhythm brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Moritz Grosse-Wentrup; Bernhard Schölkopf
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Exceeding chance level by chance: The caveat of theoretical chance levels in brain signal classification and statistical assessment of decoding accuracy.

Authors:  Etienne Combrisson; Karim Jerbi
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  The predictive role of pre-cue EEG rhythms on MI-based BCI classification performance.

Authors:  Atieh Bamdadian; Cuntai Guan; Kai Keng Ang; Jianxin Xu
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Motor imagery in patients with a right hemisphere stroke and unilateral neglect.

Authors:  Anke Vromen; Jeanine A Verbunt; Sascha Rasquin; Derick T Wade
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  How does multiple testing correction work?

Authors:  William S Noble
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study.

Authors:  Ander Ramos-Murguialday; Doris Broetz; Massimiliano Rea; Leonhard Läer; Ozge Yilmaz; Fabricio L Brasil; Giulia Liberati; Marco R Curado; Eliana Garcia-Cossio; Alexandros Vyziotis; Woosang Cho; Manuel Agostini; Ernesto Soares; Surjo Soekadar; Andrea Caria; Leonardo G Cohen; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Control beliefs can predict the ability to up-regulate sensorimotor rhythm during neurofeedback training.

Authors:  Matthias Witte; Silvia Erika Kober; Manuel Ninaus; Christa Neuper; Guilherme Wood
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  28 in total

1.  Heading for new shores! Overcoming pitfalls in BCI design.

Authors:  Ricardo Chavarriaga; Melanie Fried-Oken; Sonja Kleih; Fabien Lotte; Reinhold Scherer
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2016-12-30

2.  Predicting motor skill learning in older adults using visuospatial performance.

Authors:  Peiyuan Wang; Frank J Infurna; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Mot Learn Dev       Date:  2020-04

Review 3.  Guidelines for Feature Matching Assessment of Brain-Computer Interfaces for Augmentative and Alternative Communication.

Authors:  Kevin M Pitt; Jonathan S Brumberg
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Learning in brain-computer interface control evidenced by joint decomposition of brain and behavior.

Authors:  Jennifer Stiso; Marie-Constance Corsi; Jean M Vettel; Javier Garcia; Fabio Pasqualetti; Fabrizio De Vico Fallani; Timothy H Lucas; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Embodiment Comfort Levels During Motor Imagery Training Combined With Immersive Virtual Reality in a Spinal Cord Injury Patient.

Authors:  Carla Pais-Vieira; Pedro Gaspar; Demétrio Matos; Leonor Palminha Alves; Bárbara Moreira da Cruz; Maria João Azevedo; Miguel Gago; Tânia Poleri; André Perrotta; Miguel Pais-Vieira
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Visuospatial function predicts one-week motor skill retention in cognitively intact older adults.

Authors:  Jennapher Lingo VanGilder; Caitlin R Hengge; Kevin Duff; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Evidence for associations between Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test and motor skill learning in older adults.

Authors:  Jennapher Lingo VanGilder; Keith R Lohse; Kevin Duff; Peiyuan Wang; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2021-01-29

8.  Neurofeedback Training of Alpha Relative Power Improves the Performance of Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Qing Zhou; Ruidong Cheng; Lin Yao; Xiangming Ye; Kedi Xu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.473

9.  User's Self-Prediction of Performance in Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface.

Authors:  Minkyu Ahn; Hohyun Cho; Sangtae Ahn; Sung C Jun
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Handedness effects on motor imagery during kinesthetic and visual-motor conditions.

Authors:  Dariusz Zapała; Paulina Iwanowicz; Piotr Francuz; Paweł Augustynowicz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.