Literature DB >> 12899258

How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?

C Guger1, G Edlinger, W Harkam, I Niedermayer, G Pfurtscheller.   

Abstract

Ninety-nine healthy people participated in a brain-computer interface (BCI) field study conducted at an exposition held in Graz, Austria. Each subject spent 20-30 min on a two-session BCI investigation. The first session consisted of 40 trials conducted without feedback. Then, a subject-specific classifier was set up to provide the subject with feedback, and the second session--40 trials in which the subject had to control a horizontal bar on a computer screen--was conducted. Subjects were instructed to imagine a right-hand movement or a foot movement after a cue stimulus depending on the direction of an arrow. Bipolar electrodes were mounted over the right-hand representation area and over the foot representation area. Classification results achieved with 1) an adaptive autoregressive model (39 subjects) and 2) band power estimation (60 subjects) are presented. Roughly 93% of the subjects were able to achieve classification accuracy above 60% after two sessions of training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12899258     DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  83 in total

1.  Brain-computer interface: current and emerging rehabilitation applications.

Authors:  Janis J Daly; Jane E Huggins
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  A comparison approach toward finding the best feature and classifier in cue-based BCI.

Authors:  R Boostani; B Graimann; M H Moradi; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Model based generalization analysis of common spatial pattern in brain computer interfaces.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Guangquan Liu; Jianjun Meng; Dingguo Zhang; Xiangyang Zhu
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2010-06-06       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Critiquing the Concept of BCI Illiteracy.

Authors:  Margaret C Thompson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness.

Authors:  Rupert Ortner; Brendan Z Allison; Gerald Pichler; Alexander Heilinger; Nikolaus Sabathiel; Christoph Guger
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 1.355

6.  Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Sensorimotor Rhythms.

Authors:  Bin He; Bryan Baxter; Bradley J Edelman; Christopher C Cline; Wendy Ye
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 10.961

7.  Novel hybrid brain-computer interface system based on motor imagery and P300.

Authors:  Cili Zuo; Jing Jin; Erwei Yin; Rami Saab; Yangyang Miao; Xingyu Wang; Dewen Hu; Andrzej Cichocki
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 5.082

8.  An MEG-based brain-computer interface (BCI).

Authors:  Jürgen Mellinger; Gerwin Schalk; Christoph Braun; Hubert Preissl; Wolfgang Rosenstiel; Niels Birbaumer; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The influence of psychological state and motivation on brain-computer interface performance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Femke Nijboer; Niels Birbaumer; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Spatial detection of multiple movement intentions from SAM-filtered single-trial MEG signals.

Authors:  Harsha Battapady; Peter Lin; Tom Holroyd; Mark Hallett; Xuedong Chen; Ding-Yu Fei; Ou Bai
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.