| Literature DB >> 29629393 |
Ricardo Chavarriaga1, Melanie Fried-Oken2, Sonja Kleih3, Fabien Lotte4, Reinhold Scherer5.
Abstract
Research in brain-computer interfaces has achieved impressive progress towards implementing assistive technologies for restoration or substitution of lost motor capabilities, as well as supporting technologies for able-bodied subjects. Notwithstanding this progress, effective translation of these interfaces from proof-of concept prototypes into reliable applications remains elusive. As a matter of fact, most of the current BCI systems cannot be used independently for long periods of time by their intended end-users. Multiple factors that impair achieving this goal have already been identified. However, it is not clear how do they affect the overall BCI performance or how they should be tackled. This is worsened by the publication bias where only positive results are disseminated, preventing the research community from learning from its errors. This paper is the result of a workshop held at the 6th International BCI meeting in Asilomar. We summarize here the discussion on concrete research avenues and guidelines that may help overcoming common pitfalls and make BCIs become a useful alternative communication device.Entities:
Keywords: BCI; EEG; artifacts; limitations; publication bias; signal processing; user centered design; user training
Year: 2016 PMID: 29629393 PMCID: PMC5884128 DOI: 10.1080/2326263X.2016.1263916
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon) ISSN: 2326-2621