Literature DB >> 32369802

Learning in brain-computer interface control evidenced by joint decomposition of brain and behavior.

Jennifer Stiso1, Marie-Constance Corsi, Jean M Vettel, Javier Garcia, Fabio Pasqualetti, Fabrizio De Vico Fallani, Timothy H Lucas, Danielle S Bassett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Motor imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) use an individual's ability to volitionally modulate localized brain activity, often as a therapy for motor dysfunction or to probe causal relations between brain activity and behavior. However, many individuals cannot learn to successfully modulate their brain activity, greatly limiting the efficacy of BCI for therapy and for basic scientific inquiry. Formal experiments designed to probe the nature of BCI learning have offered initial evidence that coherent activity across spatially distributed and functionally diverse cognitive systems is a hallmark of individuals who can successfully learn to control the BCI. However, little is known about how these distributed networks interact through time to support learning. APPROACH: Here, we address this gap in knowledge by constructing and applying a multimodal network approach to decipher brain-behavior relations in motor imagery-based brain-computer interface learning using magnetoencephalography. Specifically, we employ a minimally constrained matrix decomposition method - non-negative matrix factorization - to simultaneously identify regularized, covarying subgraphs of functional connectivity, to assess their similarity to task performance, and to detect their time-varying expression. MAIN
RESULTS: We find that learning is marked by diffuse brain-behavior relations: good learners displayed many subgraphs whose temporal expression tracked performance. Individuals also displayed marked variation in the spatial properties of subgraphs such as the connectivity between the frontal lobe and the rest of the brain, and in the temporal properties of subgraphs such as the stage of learning at which they reached maximum expression. From these observations, we posit a conceptual model in which certain subgraphs support learning by modulating brain activity in sensors near regions important for sustaining attention. To test this model, we use tools that stipulate regional dynamics on a networked system (network control theory), and find that good learners display a single subgraph whose temporal expression tracked performance and whose architecture supports easy modulation of sensors located near brain regions important for attention. SIGNIFICANCE: The nature of our contribution to the neuroscience of BCI learning is therefore both computational and theoretical; we first use a minimally-constrained, individual specific method of identifying mesoscale structure in dynamic brain activity to show how global connectivity and interactions between distributed networks supports BCI learning, and then we use a formal network model of control to lend theoretical support to the hypothesis that these identified subgraphs are well suited to modulate attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32369802      PMCID: PMC7734596          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab9064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  89 in total

1.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance.

Authors:  Benjamin Blankertz; Claudia Sannelli; Sebastian Halder; Eva M Hammer; Andrea Kübler; Klaus-Robert Müller; Gabriel Curio; Thorsten Dickhaus
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations.

Authors:  Satu Palva; J Matias Palva
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Principal components of functional connectivity: a new approach to study dynamic brain connectivity during rest.

Authors:  Nora Leonardi; Jonas Richiardi; Markus Gschwind; Samanta Simioni; Jean-Marie Annoni; Myriam Schluep; Patrik Vuilleumier; Dimitri Van De Ville
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  EEG-based discrimination between imagination of right and left hand movement.

Authors:  G Pfurtscheller; C Neuper; D Flotzinger; M Pregenzer
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-12

Review 5.  Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback.

Authors:  Ranganatha Sitaram; Tomas Ros; Luke Stoeckel; Sven Haller; Frank Scharnowski; Jarrod Lewis-Peacock; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Maria Laura Blefari; Mohit Rana; Ethan Oblak; Niels Birbaumer; James Sulzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Operant conditioning of cortical unit activity.

Authors:  E E Fetz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-02-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Motor sequence learning-induced neural efficiency in functional brain connectivity.

Authors:  Helmet T Karim; Theodore J Huppert; Kirk I Erickson; Mariegold E Wollam; Patrick J Sparto; Ervin Sejdić; Jessie M VanSwearingen
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Causal Evidence for the Role of Neuronal Oscillations in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention.

Authors:  Justin Riddle; Kai Hwang; Dillan Cellier; Sofia Dhanani; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Measuring functional connectivity using MEG: methodology and comparison with fcMRI.

Authors:  Matthew J Brookes; Joanne R Hale; Johanna M Zumer; Claire M Stevenson; Susan T Francis; Gareth R Barnes; Julia P Owen; Peter G Morris; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Visuo-motor coordination ability predicts performance with brain-computer interfaces controlled by modulation of sensorimotor rhythms (SMR).

Authors:  Eva M Hammer; Tobias Kaufmann; Sonja C Kleih; Benjamin Blankertz; Andrea Kübler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  3 in total

1.  Multiregional neural pathway: from movement planning to initiation.

Authors:  Xing-Feng Mao; Shuai-Shuai Wang; Feng Han
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  A practical guide to methodological considerations in the controllability of structural brain networks.

Authors:  Teresa M Karrer; Jason Z Kim; Jennifer Stiso; Ari E Kahn; Fabio Pasqualetti; Ute Habel; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlook.

Authors:  Pragya Srivastava; Erfan Nozari; Jason Z Kim; Harang Ju; Dale Zhou; Cassiano Becker; Fabio Pasqualetti; George J Pappas; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.