Literature DB >> 26623144

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for isolated calyceal stones: How important is the stone location?

Faruk Özgör1, Onur Küçüktopcu1, Abdulmuttalip Şimşek1, Ömer Sarılar1, Murat Binbay1, Gökhan Gürbüz1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of percutaneous access site on the success and complication rates of isolated calyceal stones.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 2700 patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) in our clinic between October 2002 and August 2014. We selected only the patients with isolated lower, middle or upper calyceal stones and we grouped the patients according to the location of their stones. Successful operation was defined as complete stone clearence or retention of stone fragments smaller than 4 mm which do not lead to infection, obstruction or pain requiring treatment. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also recorded.
RESULTS: Totally 360 patients underwent PNL for their isolated upper, middle and lower calyceal stones. Access sites for those patients were selected based on stone location. The stones were localized in the lower (n=304), middle (n=14), and upper (n=42) calices. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to operation and scopy times. Hemoglobin drop was seen more frequently in the upper calyceal access group, without any significant intergroup difference. Thoracic complications including hemothorax, pneumothorax and pleural effusion were more common in the upper calyceal access group (11.9%; p<0.001). Complete stone clerance was accomplished in 81.9%, 92.9% and 78.6% of the patients with lower, middle and upper calyceal stones respectively without any significant intergroup difference (p=0.537).
CONCLUSION: PNL is an effective and safe treatment modality for isolated calyceal kidney stones and upper calyceal access causes thoracic complications more than other access sites.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Isolated calyceal stones; kidney calculi; percutaneous nephrolitotomy

Year:  2015        PMID: 26623144      PMCID: PMC4621143          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2015.06787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  18 in total

1.  Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery.

Authors:  R Munver; F C Delvecchio; G E Newman; G M Preminger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Intercostal vessels and nerves are at risk for injury during supracostal percutaneous nephrostolithotomy.

Authors:  Marc McAllister; Kelvin Lim; Robert Torrey; James Chenoweth; Brent Barker; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Upper-pole access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Nelson Rodrigues Netto
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi.

Authors:  Zhamshid Okhunov; Justin I Friedlander; Arvin K George; Brian D Duty; Daniel M Moreira; Arun K Srinivasan; Joel Hillelsohn; Arthur D Smith; Zeph Okeke
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi.

Authors:  M Grasso; M Ficazzola
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones.

Authors:  Mahesh Desai; Antonello De Lisa; Burak Turna; Jorge Rioja; Helena Walfridsson; Alessandro D'Addessi; Carson Wong; Jean Rosette On Behalf Of The Croes Pcnl Study Group
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Treatment outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones and predictive factors of stone-free.

Authors:  Soo Hyun Lim; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Deok Hyun Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

8.  Comparative results of shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices.

Authors:  Burak Turna; Fatih Ekren; Oktay Nazli; Kaan Akbay; Baris Altay; Ceyhun Ozyurt; Necmettin Cikili
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Middle calyx access in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Majid Kazemzadeh; Ahmad Asadollahzade; Alireza Farzan; Reza Shahrokhi Damavand; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  2 in total

1.  RE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for isolated calyceal stones: How important is the stone location?

Authors:  Mohd Nazli Kamarulzaman
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2016-06

Review 2.  Superior calyceal access vs. other calyceal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yucheng Ma; Lede Lin; Zhumei Luo; Tao Jin
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-09-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.