Literature DB >> 26621678

Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty.

U R Krause-Titz1, N Warneke2, S Freitag-Wolf3, H Barth4, H M Mehdorn4.   

Abstract

After performing a decompressive craniectomy, a cranioplastic surgery is usually warranted. The complications of this reconstructive procedure may differ from the initial operation. The authors of this study report on their experience to define patient-specific and procedural risk factors for possible complications following cranioplasty influencing the outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)), mobility, shunt dependency, and seizures. A retrospective analysis of 263 patients of all ages and both sexes who had undergone cranioplasty after craniectomy for traumatic brain injury (including chronic subdural hematoma), subarachnoidal hemorrhage (including intracerebral hemorrhage), ischemic stroke, and tumor surgery in one single center in 12 years from January 2000 to March 2012 has been carried out. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors (age, gender, used cranioplasty material, initial diagnosis, clipped or coil-embolized subarachnoidal hemorrhage (SAH) patients, time interval, complications especially hydrocephalus and seizures, mobility) upon the prognosis described as a dichotomized Glasgow Outcome Scale. Two hundred forty-eight patients met the study criteria. The overall complication rate after cranioplastic surgery was 18.5% (46 patients). Complications included: surgical site infection, epidural hematoma, hydrocephalus with or without former SAH, and new-onset seizures. Logistic regression analysis identified significant correlation between a low GOS (2 or 3) and postoperative seizures (OR 2.37, CI 1.35-4.18, p < 0.05), shunt-depending hydrocephalus (OR 5.83, CI 3.06-11.11, p < 0.05), and age between 51 and 70 years (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.09-5.29, p = 0.029). However, gender, time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, initial diagnosis, and used cranioplasty material had no significant influence on post-cranioplasty complications as surgical site infections, hematoma, wound healing disturbance, seizures, or hydrocephalus. Evaluation of treatment modality in aneurysmal SAH clip vs. coil showed no significant relation to postoperative complications either. Complications after cranioplastic surgery are a common problem, as prognostic factors could identify a shunt-depending hydrocephalus and epilepsia to develop a major deficit after cranioplastic surgery (GOS 2 or 3). We detected a significant extra risk of people between the age of 51 and 70 years to end up in GOS level 2 or 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Cranioplasty; Decompressive craniectomy; Glasgow Outcome Scale; Hydrocephalus; Seizures

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26621678     DOI: 10.1007/s10143-015-0678-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Rev        ISSN: 0344-5607            Impact factor:   3.042


  41 in total

1.  Influence of cranioplasty on postural blood flow regulation, cerebrovascular reserve capacity, and cerebral glucose metabolism.

Authors:  P A Winkler; W Stummer; R Linke; K G Krishnan; K Tatsch
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis.

Authors:  J RANKIN
Journal:  Scott Med J       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 0.729

3.  The minimum time for cranioplasty insertion from craniectomy is six months to reduce risk of infection--a case series of 82 patients.

Authors:  Dushan Thavarajah; Patricia De Lacy; Ahmed Hussien; Adrian Sugar
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 1.596

4.  Dynamics of cerebral blood flow and metabolism in patients with cranioplasty as evaluated by 133Xe CT and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  K Yoshida; M Furuse; A Izawa; N Iizima; H Kuchiwaki; S Inao
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.

Authors:  J C van Swieten; P J Koudstaal; M C Visser; H J Schouten; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Onset seizures independently predict poor outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  H Butzkueven; A H Evans; A Pitman; C Leopold; D J Jolley; A H Kaye; C J Kilpatrick; S M Davis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  D James Cooper; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Lynnette Murray; Yaseen M Arabi; Andrew R Davies; Paul D'Urso; Thomas Kossmann; Jennie Ponsford; Ian Seppelt; Peter Reilly; Rory Wolfe
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting.

Authors:  Bum-Joon Kim; Ki-Sun Hong; Kyung-Jae Park; Dong-Hyuk Park; Yong-Gu Chung; Shin-Hyuk Kang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2012-12-31

9.  Decompressive Surgery for the Treatment of Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery (DESTINY): a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Eric Jüttler; Stefan Schwab; Peter Schmiedek; Andreas Unterberg; Michael Hennerici; Johannes Woitzik; Steffen Witte; Ekkehart Jenetzky; Werner Hacke
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Risk of epilepsy after traumatic brain injury: a retrospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Chun-Chieh Yeh; Ta-Liang Chen; Chaur-Jong Hu; Wen-Ta Chiu; Chien-Chang Liao
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  11 in total

1.  Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.

Authors:  M V M Anchieta; F A Salles; B D Cassaro; M M Quaresma; B F O Santos
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: minor surgical complexity but still high periprocedural complication rates.

Authors:  Ehab Shiban; Nicole Lange; Antonia Hauser; Ann-Kathrin Jörger; Arthur Wagner; Bernhard Meyer; Jens Lehmberg
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.

Authors:  Haley Meyer; Syed I Khalid; Amir H Dorafshar; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 0.558

4.  Aphasic status epilepticus as the sole symptom of epilepsy: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Ji-Qing Qiu; Yu Cui; Li-Chao Sun; Zhan-Peng Zhu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Consensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury : Consensus statement.

Authors:  Peter J Hutchinson; Angelos G Kolias; Tamara Tajsic; Amos Adeleye; Abenezer Tirsit Aklilu; Tedy Apriawan; Abdul Hafid Bajamal; Ernest J Barthélemy; B Indira Devi; Dhananjaya Bhat; Diederik Bulters; Randall Chesnut; Giuseppe Citerio; D Jamie Cooper; Marek Czosnyka; Idara Edem; Nasser M F El-Ghandour; Anthony Figaji; Kostas N Fountas; Clare Gallagher; Gregory W J Hawryluk; Corrado Iaccarino; Mathew Joseph; Tariq Khan; Tsegazeab Laeke; Oleg Levchenko; Baiyun Liu; Weiming Liu; Andrew Maas; Geoffrey T Manley; Paul Manson; Anna T Mazzeo; David K Menon; Daniel B Michael; Susanne Muehlschlegel; David O Okonkwo; Kee B Park; Jeffrey V Rosenfeld; Gail Rosseau; Andres M Rubiano; Hamisi K Shabani; Nino Stocchetti; Shelly D Timmons; Ivan Timofeev; Chris Uff; Jamie S Ullman; Alex Valadka; Vicknes Waran; Adam Wells; Mark H Wilson; Franco Servadei
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Consensus statement from the international consensus meeting on post-traumatic cranioplasty.

Authors:  C Iaccarino; A Kolias; P D Adelson; A M Rubiano; E Viaroli; A Buki; G Cinalli; K Fountas; T Khan; S Signoretti; V Waran; A O Adeleye; R Amorim; A Bertuccio; A Cama; R M Chesnut; P De Bonis; A Estraneo; A Figaji; S I Florian; R Formisano; P Frassanito; C Gatos; A Germanò; C Giussani; I Hossain; P Kasprzak; F La Porta; D Lindner; A I R Maas; W Paiva; P Palma; K B Park; P Peretta; A Pompucci; J Posti; S K Sengupta; A Sinha; V Sinha; R Stefini; G Talamonti; A Tasiou; G Zona; M Zucchelli; P J Hutchinson; F Servadei
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 2.216

7.  A pilot study on the impact of dopamine, serotonin, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor genotype on long-term functional outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Ansley Stanfill; Claire Simpson; Paula Sherwood; Samuel Poloyac; Elizabeth Crago; Hyungsuk Kim; Yvette Conley
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-08-31

8.  Complications in cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: timing of the intervention.

Authors:  Taco Goedemans; Dagmar Verbaan; Olivier van der Veer; Maarten Bot; René Post; Jantien Hoogmoed; Michiel B Lequin; Dennis R Buis; W Peter Vandertop; Bert A Coert; Pepijn van den Munckhof
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Corrado Iaccarino; Angelos G Kolias; Louis-Georges Roumy; Kostas Fountas; Amos Olufemi Adeleye
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Shepetovsky; Gianluca Mezzini; Lorenzo Magrassi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.