Literature DB >> 27167515

Skull reconstruction after resection of bone tumors in a single surgical time by the association of the techniques of rapid prototyping and surgical navigation.

M V M Anchieta1,2, F A Salles3, B D Cassaro3, M M Quaresma3, B F O Santos4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Presentation of a new cranioplasty technique employing a combination of two technologies: rapid prototyping and surgical navigation. This technique allows the reconstruction of the skull cap after the resection of a bone tumor in a single surgical time.
METHODS: The neurosurgeon plans the craniotomy previously on the EximiusMed software, compatible with the Eximius Surgical Navigator, both from the company Artis Tecnologia (Brazil). The navigator imports the planning and guides the surgeon during the craniotomy. The simulation of the bone fault allows the virtual reconstruction of the skull cap and the production of a personalized modelling mold using the Magics-Materialise (Belgium)-software. The mold and a replica of the bone fault are made by rapid prototyping by the company Artis Tecnologia (Brazil) and shipped under sterile conditions to the surgical center. The PMMA prosthesis is produced during the surgical act with the help of a hand press.
RESULTS: The total time necessary for the planning and production of the modelling mold is four days. The precision of the mold is submillimetric and accurately reproduces the virtual reconstruction of the prosthesis. The production of the prosthesis during surgery takes until twenty minutes depending on the type of PMMA used. The modelling mold avoids contraction and dissipates the heat generated by the material's exothermic reaction in the polymerization phase. The craniectomy is performed with precision over the drawing made with the help of the Eximius Surgical Navigator, according to the planned measurements. The replica of the bone fault serves to evaluate the adaptation of the prosthesis as a support for the perforations and the placement of screws and fixation plates, as per the surgeon's discretion.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique allows the adequate oncologic treatment associated with a satisfactory aesthetic result, with precision, in a single surgical time, reducing time and costs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cranioplasty; Craniotomy; Decompressive craniectomy; Rapid prototyping; Reconstruction; Surgical navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27167515     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-016-1415-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  7 in total

1.  Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty--A finite element study.

Authors:  Angela Ridwan-Pramana; Petr Marcián; Libor Borák; Nathaniel Narra; Tim Forouzanfar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.

Authors:  Joby Jaberi; Kenneth Gambrell; Paul Tiwana; Chris Madden; Rick Finn
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Cranioplasty of Hemispherical Defects Using High Impact Methylmethacrylic Plate.

Authors:  N Girish Kumar; H Rangarajan; Pankaj Shourie
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Factors influencing the outcome (GOS) in reconstructive cranioplasty.

Authors:  U R Krause-Titz; N Warneke; S Freitag-Wolf; H Barth; H M Mehdorn
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Neuro-navigation: An Adjunct in Craniofacial Surgeries: Our Experience.

Authors:  Harsha Chauhan; S Girish Rao; B A Chandramurli; S Sampath
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-17

6.  Ossifying fibroma of the skull: interactive image-guided minimally invasive localization and resection.

Authors:  Carsten Westendorff; Jürgen Hoffmann; Dirk Troitzsch; Florian Dammann; Siegmar Reinert
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 7.  Errors and error management in image-guided craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Gerlig Widmann; Rudolf Stoffner; Reto Bale
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-05
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Automated Implant Resizing for Single-Stage Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Shuya Liu; Wei-Lun Huang; Chad Gordon; Mehran Armand
Journal:  IEEE Robot Autom Lett       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 2.  Computer-assisted navigation in orbitofacial surgery.

Authors:  Priti Udhay; Kasturi Bhattacharjee; P Ananthnarayanan; Gangadhar Sundar
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 3.  Applications of 3D printing in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Arpine Galstyan; Michael J Bunker; Fluvio Lobo; Robert Sims; James Inziello; Jack Stubbs; Rita Mukhtar; Tatiana Kelil
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2021-02-09

4.  Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration.

Authors:  Erasmo Barros da Silva Júnior; Afonso Henrique de Aragão; Marcelo de Paula Loureiro; Caetano Silva Lobo; Ana Flávia Oliveti; Rafael Martinelli de Oliveira; Ricardo Ramina
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2021-02-06

5.  Early experience with patient-specific low-cost 3D-printed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty implants in a lower-middle-income-country: Technical note and economic analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Ashraf; Nabeel Choudhary; Usman Ahmad Kamboh; Muhammad Asif Raza; Kashif Ali Sultan; Naseeruddin Ghulam; Syed Shahzad Hussain; Naveed Ashraf
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-06-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.