Literature DB >> 26953202

Vancomycin 24-Hour Area under the Curve/Minimum Bactericidal Concentration Ratio as a Novel Predictor of Mortality in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Nicholas S Britt1, Nimish Patel2, Rebecca T Horvat3, Molly E Steed4.   

Abstract

While previous studies have examined the association between vancomycin (VAN) exposure and MIC with regard to outcomes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSA-B), none have explored if a relationship exists with the VAN minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC). The objective of this study was to evaluate the VAN 24-h area under the curve (AUC24)/MBC ratio as a pharmacodynamic predictor of mortality. This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with VAN for MRSA-B with the primary outcome of 30-day all-cause mortality. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, antimicrobial treatment data, therapeutic drug levels, and laboratory and microbiological data. Vancomycin MICs and MBCs were determined by Etest (MIC only) and broth microdilution (BMD). The vancomycin AUC24 was determined by pharmacokinetic maximum a posteriori probability Bayesian (MAP-Bayesian) analysis. The most significant breakpoint for 30-day mortality was determined by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. The association between pharmacodynamic parameters (VAN AUC24/MICBMD, VAN AUC24/MICEtest, and AUC24/MBCBMD) and mortality were determined by χ(2) and multivariable Poisson regression. Overall mortality in this cohort (n = 53) was 20.8% (n = 11/53), and all corresponding MRSA blood isolates were VAN susceptible (MIC range, 0.5 to 2 μg/ml; MIC50, 1 μg/ml; MIC90, 1 μg/ml). The CART-derived breakpoints for mortality were 176 (VAN AUC24/MBC) and 334 (VAN AUC24/MICBMD). In multivariable analysis, the association between a VAN AUC24/MBC of ≥176 and survival persisted, but VAN AUC24/MICBMD values (≥334 or ≥400) were not associated with improved mortality. In conclusion, VAN AUC24/MBC was a more important predictor of 30-day mortality than VAN AUC24/MIC for MRSA-B.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26953202      PMCID: PMC4862500          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02714-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

1.  Inhibition of the autolytic system by vancomycin causes mimicry of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus-type resistance, cell concentration dependence of the MIC, and antibiotic tolerance in vancomycin-susceptible S. aureus.

Authors:  Krzysztof Sieradzki; Alexander Tomasz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Combinatorial phenotypic signatures distinguish persistent from resolving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia isolates.

Authors:  Kati Seidl; Arnold S Bayer; Vance G Fowler; James A McKinnell; Wessam Abdel Hady; George Sakoulas; Michael R Yeaman; Yan Q Xiong
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Quantifying the matrix of relationships between reduced vancomycin susceptibility phenotypes and outcomes among patients with MRSA bloodstream infections treated with vancomycin .

Authors:  T P Lodise; G L Drusano; V Lazariu; N El-Fawal; A Evans; E Graffunder; K Stellrecht; R E Mendes; R N Jones; L Cosler; L A McNutt
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Evaluation of a two-compartment Bayesian forecasting program for predicting vancomycin concentrations.

Authors:  K A Rodvold; R D Pryka; M Garrison; J C Rotschafer
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Vancomycin tolerance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: influence of vancomycin, daptomycin, and telavancin on differential resistance gene expression.

Authors:  Warren E Rose; Michael Fallon; John J M Moran; Joshua P Vanderloo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Vancomycin: we can't get there from here.

Authors:  Nimish Patel; Manjunath P Pai; Keith A Rodvold; Ben Lomaestro; George L Drusano; Thomas P Lodise
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Vancomycin in vitro bactericidal activity and its relationship to efficacy in clearance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  Pamela A Moise; George Sakoulas; Alan Forrest; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Relationship between vancomycin MIC and failure among patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia treated with vancomycin.

Authors:  T P Lodise; J Graves; A Evans; E Graffunder; M Helmecke; B M Lomaestro; K Stellrecht
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Relationship of MIC and bactericidal activity to efficacy of vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Authors:  George Sakoulas; Pamela A Moise-Broder; Jerome Schentag; Alan Forrest; Robert C Moellering; George M Eliopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  High vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration and clinical outcomes in adults with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jesse T Jacob; Carlos A DiazGranados
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.623

View more
  5 in total

1.  Should Therapeutic Monitoring of Vancomycin Based on Area under the Curve Become Standard Practice for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-06-01

2.  Activity of pulmonary vancomycin exposures versus planktonic and biofilm isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from cystic fibrosis sputum.

Authors:  Nicholas S Britt; Daniel S Hazlett; Rebecca T Horvat; Rachael M Liesman; Molly E Steed
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Revising Pediatric Vancomycin Dosing Accounting for Nephrotoxicity in a Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Model.

Authors:  Frank Kloprogge; Louise F Hill; John Booth; Nigel Klein; Adam D Irwin; Garth Dixon; Joseph F Standing
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Relationship between vancomycin tolerance and clinical outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

Authors:  Nicholas S Britt; Nimish Patel; Theresa I Shireman; Wissam I El Atrouni; Rebecca T Horvat; Molly E Steed
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Vancomycin in neonatal sepsis: predictive performance of a Chinese neonatal population pharmacokinetic model and clinical efficacy evaluation.

Authors:  Xiao-Hong Weng; Chen-Qi Zhu; Zong-Tai Feng; Lian Tang; Lu-Fen Duan; Lan Li; Zu-Ming Yang; San-Nan Wang; Yan Cai; Jing-Jing Li; Yan-Xia Yu
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2021-01-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.