Literature DB >> 26617689

Pathologic findings in patients with targeted magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate needle core biopsies.

Rachel L Geller1, Sherif G Nour2, Adeboye O Osunkoya3.   

Abstract

In contrast to the routine (non-targeted) sampling approach of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies (TRUS-GB), targeted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies (TMRI-GB) target regions of the prostate suspicious for prostate cancer (PCa), based on findings on multiparametric MRI. We sought to examine the pathologic findings identified on TMRI-GB, due to the fact that there are limited studies on this in the Pathology literature. A search was made through our Urologic Pathology files for prostate needle core biopsies that were obtained via TMRI-GB. Forty-six patients were identified. Mean patient (PT) age was 62 years (range: 50-78 years). Twenty one of 46 PTs (46%) had a history of PCa, 10/46 PTs (22%) had a history of negative TRUS-GB and rising PSA, and the remaining 15/46 PTs (32%) had never undergone biopsy. Cancer detection rate on TMRI-GB was 57% for PTs with a prior diagnosis of PCa, 50% for PTs with a history of benign biopsy, and 67% who were biopsy naïve. An average of 3.16 cores were sampled from malignant lesions and an average of 2.74 were sampled from benign lesions (P=0.02). TMRI-GB has a higher cancer detection rate than TRUS-GB. TMRI-GB may have a critical role as a tool for active surveillance, tumor mapping, and primary detection of PCa, which will likely evolve as the ability to identify malignant lesions improve. The roles of pathologists and radiologists in the validation of this procedure will continue to be even more vital in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Prostate; needle core biopsies; prostatic adenocarcinoma; targeted

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26617689      PMCID: PMC4637774     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol        ISSN: 1936-2625


  14 in total

Review 1.  MRI-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of current clinical results.

Authors:  Christiaan G Overduin; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study.

Authors:  Joseph C Presti; Gerard J O'Dowd; M Craig Miller; Rubina Mattu; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline M Moore; Nicola L Robertson; Nasr Arsanious; Thomas Middleton; Arnauld Villers; Laurence Klotz; Samir S Taneja; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.

Authors:  Michael Quentin; Dirk Blondin; Christian Arsov; Lars Schimmöller; Andreas Hiester; Erhard Godehardt; Peter Albers; Gerald Antoch; Robert Rabenalt
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Robert K Nam; Refik Saskin; Yuna Lee; Ying Liu; Calvin Law; Laurence H Klotz; D Andrew Loblaw; John Trachtenberg; Aleksandra Stanimirovic; Andrew E Simor; Arun Seth; David R Urbach; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study.

Authors:  Kimberly A Roehl; Jo Ann V Antenor; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Martijn G Schouten; Joyce G R Bomers; Stefan P Hoogendoorn; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Hambrock; Henk Vergunst; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Optimal biopsy strategies for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Morgan R Pokorny; Maarten de Rooij; Earl Duncan; Fritz H Schröder; Robert Parkinson; Jelle O Barentsz; Leslie C Thompson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  2 in total

1.  In-Bore MRI-guided Prostate Biopsies in Patients with Prior Positive Transrectal US-guided Biopsy Results: Pathologic Outcomes and Predictors of Missed Cancers.

Authors:  Kareem K Elfatairy; Christopher P Filson; Martin G Sanda; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Sherif G Nour
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2020-09-25

2.  MRI-guided, transrectal, intraprostatic steam application as potential focal therapeutic modality for prostatic diseases in a large animal translational model: A feasibility follow-up study.

Authors:  Adriano Wang-Leandro; Florian Willmitzer; Agnieszka Karol; Beat Porcellini; Peter Kronen; Emile M Hiltbrand; Daniel Rüfenacht; Patrick R Kircher; Henning Richter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.