Literature DB >> 11992052

Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study.

Kimberly A Roehl1, Jo Ann V Antenor, William J Catalona.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated prostate biopsy results in men with elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels and/or suspicious digital rectal examination whose initial biopsies did not reveal cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2,526 volunteers 40 years old or older underwent 1 or more prostate biopsies for serum PSA concentrations greater than 4.0 ng./ml. (before May 1995) or greater than 2.5 ng./ml. (after May 1995), or digital rectal examination suspicious of cancer. We evaluated compliance with the biopsy recommendation and the cancer detection rate with regard to digital rectal examination results and increasing PSA levels.
RESULTS: Of the men who underwent up to 10 biopsy procedures the serial cancer detection rates were 29%, 17%, 14%, 11%, 9% and 7%, respectively, on biopsy procedures 1 through 6. No significant difference in the yield of cancer on serial biopsies was observed between the groups using the greater than 4.0 ng./ml. and greater than 2.5 ng./ml. cutoff. There was a trend for more cancers detected through serial screening to be organ confined compared with those detected on initial screening (78% versus 69%, p = 0.05). Also, more cancers detected using the greater than 2.5 ng./ml. cutoff were organ confined (80% versus 66%, p = 0.004). Only approximately 1% of the cancers fulfilled the published criteria for clinically insignificant tumors.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a quarter of prostate cancers detected in this screening study were missed by the initial biopsy. Of the 962 prostate cancers detected 77% were detected with 1, 91% with 2, 97% with 3 and 99% with 4 biopsy procedures. Serial biopsies detect more organ confined cancers without over detecting clinically unimportant tumors. Future studies are needed to determine whether obtaining more biopsy cores initially would provide earlier prostate cancer detection and avoid unnecessary repeat biopsies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  96 in total

1.  Ultra-high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation in 201 cases with histopathological correlation.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Katahira; Taro Takahara; Thomas C Kwee; Seitaro Oda; Yasuko Suzuki; Shoji Morishita; Kosuke Kitani; Yasuyuki Hamada; Mitsuhiko Kitaoka; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-18       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Risk factors for prostate cancer detection after a negative biopsy: a novel multivariable longitudinal approach.

Authors:  Peter H Gann; Angela Fought; Ryan Deaton; William J Catalona; Edward Vonesh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Franiel; Bernd Hamm; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  An MRI-compatible robotic system with hybrid tracking for MRI-guided prostate intervention.

Authors:  Axel Krieger; Iulian I Iordachita; Peter Guion; Anurag K Singh; Aradhana Kaushal; Cynthia Ménard; Peter A Pinto; Kevin Camphausen; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Prostate biopsy: targeting cancer for detection and therapy.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

6.  Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

7.  Multiparametric 3T endorectal mri after external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Galen D Reed; Phillip P Vinh; Christopher Sotto; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.

Authors:  Abhinav Sidana; Matthew J Watson; Arvin K George; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Srinivas Vourganti; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Akhil Muthigi; Mahir Maruf; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Jeffrey W Nix; Maria J Merino; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Development and Evaluation of an Actuated MRI-Compatible Robotic System for MRI-Guided Prostate Intervention.

Authors:  Axel Krieger; Sang-Eun Song; Nathan B Cho; Iulian Iordachita; Peter Guion; Gabor Fichtinger; Louis L Whitcomb
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.303

10.  Learning Non-rigid Deformations for Robust, Constrained Point-based Registration in Image-Guided MR-TRUS Prostate Intervention.

Authors:  John A Onofrey; Lawrence H Staib; Saradwata Sarkar; Rajesh Venkataraman; Cayce B Nawaf; Preston C Sprenkle; Xenophon Papademetris
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.