Literature DB >> 23568624

MRI-guided biopsy for prostate cancer detection: a systematic review of current clinical results.

Christiaan G Overduin1, Jurgen J Fütterer, Jelle O Barentsz.   

Abstract

In-bore magnetic resonance-guided biopsy (MRGB) has been increasingly used in clinical practice to detect prostate cancer (PCa). This review summarizes the current clinical results of this biopsy method. A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases. Of 2,035 identified records, 49 required full review. In all, ten unique studies reporting clinical results of MRGB could be included. Reported PCa detection rates ranged from 8 to 59 % (median 42 %). The majority of tumors detected by MRGB were clinically significant (81-93 %). Most frequent complications of MRGB are transient hematuria (1-24 %) and short-term perirectal bleeding (11-17 %). Major complications are rare. Based on the reviewed literature, MRGB can be regarded an accurate and safe diagnostic tool to detect clinically significant PCa. However, as general availability is limited, this procedure should be reserved for specific patients. Appropriate indications will have to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23568624     DOI: 10.1007/s11934-013-0323-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Urol Rep        ISSN: 1527-2737            Impact factor:   3.092


  38 in total

Review 1.  Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study.

Authors:  B Djavan; M Waldert; A Zlotta; P Dobronski; C Seitz; M Remzi; A Borkowski; C Schulman; M Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program.

Authors:  René Raaijmakers; Wim J Kirkels; Monique J Roobol; Mark F Wildhagen; Fritz H Schrder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.

Authors:  Bob Djavan; Shirin Milani; Mesut Remzi
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  J Irani; F Fournier; D Bon; E Gremmo; B Doré; J Aubert
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1997-04

5.  Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.

Authors:  Caroline M A Hoeks; Martijn G Schouten; Joyce G R Bomers; Stefan P Hoogendoorn; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Thomas Hambrock; Henk Vergunst; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  A comparison of the biological features between prostate cancers arising in the transition and peripheral zones.

Authors:  Iori Sakai; Ken-Ichi Harada; Isao Hara; Hiroshi Eto; Hideaki Miyake
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  MR-guided transgluteal biopsies with an open low-field system in patients with clinically suspected prostate cancer: technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Stephan Zangos; Katrin Eichler; Kerstin Engelmann; Mukhtiar Ahmed; Sebastian Dettmer; Christopher Herzog; Wasilios Pegios; A Wetter; Thomas Lehnert; Martin G Mack; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Jochen Kruecker; Sheng Xu; Neil Glossop; Peter Guion; Karen Ullman; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Patient selection determines the prostate cancer yield of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-guided transrectal biopsies in a closed 3-Tesla scanner.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Axel Krieger; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Peter Guion; Robert L Grubb; Paul S Albert; Greg Metzger; Karen Ullman; Sharon Smith; Gabor Fichtinger; Iclal Ocak; Peter Choyke; Cynthia Ménard; Jonathan Coleman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Impact of radical prostatectomy in the management of clinically localized disease.

Authors:  D F Paulson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Optimization of prostate biopsy: the role of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in detection, localization and risk assessment.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Xiaosong Meng; Julien Le Nobin; James S Wysock; Herbert Lepor; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Prostate MRI and transperineal TRUS/MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer detection: clinical practice updates.

Authors:  Eugenio Martorana; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Maria Cristina Aisa; Pietro Scialpi; Aldo Di Blasi; Giovanni Saredi; Alfredo D'Andrea; Stefano Signore; Riccardo Grisanti; Michele Scialpi
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-07-01

Review 4.  Optimizing Patient Population for MP-MRI and Fusion Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Thomas P Frye; Peter A Pinto; Arvin K George
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Discrimination between the human prostate normal cell and cancer cell by using a novel electrical impedance spectroscopy controlling the cross-sectional area of a microfluidic channel.

Authors:  Giseok Kang; Young-Jae Kim; Hong-Sang Moon; Jeong-Woo Lee; Tag-Keun Yoo; Kwangsung Park; Jong-Hyun Lee
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis: the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Penzkofer; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Pathologic correlation of transperineal in-bore 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy samples with radical prostatectomy specimen.

Authors:  Erik Velez; Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Olutayo Olubiyi; Christopher B Allard; Adam S Kibel; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-08

Review 8.  The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Sadhna Verma; Peter L Choyke; Steven C Eberhardt; Aytekin Oto; Clare M Tempany; Baris Turkbey; Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Pathologic findings in patients with targeted magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate needle core biopsies.

Authors:  Rachel L Geller; Sherif G Nour; Adeboye O Osunkoya
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 10.  Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Anna M Brown; Sandeep Sankineni; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.