Literature DB >> 26617677

Assessing the benefits and harms of low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer.

Paul F Pinsky1.   

Abstract

The concept of using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening goes back almost 25 years. In 2011, the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) reported that LDCT screening significantly reduced mortality from lung cancer in a high risk population. This article evaluates the benefits and harms of LDCT screening, based largely on evidence from randomized trials. Harms include false-positive screens and resultant diagnostic procedures, overdiagnosed cancers, and radiation exposure. Benefits can be expressed as the number needed to be screened to prevent one lung cancer death or as estimated overall reductions in lung cancer mortality assuming LDCT population screening as recommended by guidelines. Indirect metrics of benefit, such as lung cancer survival and stage distribution, as well as measures of harms, will be important to monitor in the future as LDCT screening disseminates in the population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benefits; harms; low-dose CT; lung cancer; screening

Year:  2014        PMID: 26617677      PMCID: PMC4662564          DOI: 10.2217/LMT.14.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer Manag        ISSN: 1758-1966


  30 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcium can predict all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events on low-dose CT screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter C Jacobs; Martijn J A Gondrie; Yolanda van der Graaf; Harry J de Koning; Ivana Isgum; Bram van Ginneken; Willem P T M Mali
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  ROC curves for low-dose CT in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; David S Gierada; Hrudaya Nath; Ella A Kazerooni; Judith Amorosa
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations.

Authors:  D P Naidich; C H Marshall; C Gribbin; R S Arams; D I McCauley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Assessing the impact of incidental findings in a lung cancer screening study by using low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael J Kucharczyk; Ravi J Menezes; Alexander McGregor; Narinder S Paul; Heidi C Roberts
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 2.248

5.  Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening.

Authors:  C I Henschke; D I McCauley; D F Yankelevitz; D P Naidich; G McGuinness; O S Miettinen; D M Libby; M W Pasmantier; J Koizumi; N K Altorki; J P Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography.

Authors:  M Kaneko; K Eguchi; H Ohmatsu; R Kakinuma; T Naruke; K Suemasu; N Moriyama
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Definition of a positive test result in computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a cohort study.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; Rowena Yip; David F Yankelevitz; James P Smith
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Prevalence of incidental findings in computed tomographic screening of the chest: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter C A Jacobs; Willem P Th M Mali; Diederick E Grobbee; Yolanda van der Graaf
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Short-term health-related quality of life consequences in a lung cancer CT screening trial (NELSON).

Authors:  K A M van den Bergh; M L Essink-Bot; G J J M Borsboom; E Th Scholten; M Prokop; H J de Koning; R J van Klaveren
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  Risk models to select high risk candidates for lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Matthew B Schabath
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

2.  Cost-effectiveness of lung MRI in lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Bradley D Allen; Mark L Schiebler; Gregor Sommer; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Juergen Biederer; Timothy J Kruser; James C Carr; Gordon Hazen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Johannes F Fahrmann; Tracey Marsh; Ehsan Irajizad; Nikul Patel; Eunice Murage; Jody Vykoukal; Jennifer B Dennison; Kim-Anh Do; Edwin Ostrin; Margaret R Spitz; Stephen Lam; Sanjay Shete; Rafael Meza; Martin C Tammemägi; Ziding Feng; Samir M Hanash
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Evaluation of benefits and harms of adaptive screening schedules for lung cancer: A microsimulation study.

Authors:  Pianpian Cao; Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 1.687

Review 5.  A narrative review of deep learning applications in lung cancer research: from screening to prognostication.

Authors:  Jong Hyuk Lee; Eui Jin Hwang; Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06

Review 6.  Cancer overdiagnosis: a biological challenge and clinical dilemma.

Authors:  Sudhir Srivastava; Eugene J Koay; Alexander D Borowsky; Angelo M De Marzo; Sharmistha Ghosh; Paul D Wagner; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Patient Perspectives on Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening, New Mexico, 2014.

Authors:  Shiraz I Mishra; Andrew L Sussman; Ambroshia M Murrietta; Christina M Getrich; Robert Rhyne; Richard E Crowell; Kathryn L Taylor; Ellen J Reifler; Pamela H Wescott; Ali I Saeed; Richard M Hoffman
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  MicroRNA Biomarker hsa-miR-195-5p for Detecting the Risk of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Lei Li; Tienan Feng; Weituo Zhang; Sumeng Gao; Ruoyang Wang; Wenwen Lv; Tengteng Zhu; Herbert Yu; Biyun Qian
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.326

9.  Proteomic Approach for Searching for Universal, Tissue-Specific, and Line-Specific Markers of Extracellular Vesicles in Lung and Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines.

Authors:  Svetlana Novikova; Natalia Shushkova; Tatiana Farafonova; Olga Tikhonova; Roman Kamyshinsky; Victor Zgoda
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Verification of a Blood-Based Targeted Proteomics Signature for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Ferdinando Cerciello; Meena Choi; Sara L Sinicropi-Yao; Katie Lomeo; Joseph M Amann; Emanuela Felley-Bosco; Rolf A Stahel; Bruce W S Robinson; Jenette Creaney; Harvey I Pass; Olga Vitek; David P Carbone
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.