Min Dong1, Patrick T McGann2,3, Tomoyuki Mizuno1, Russell E Ware2,3, Alexander A Vinks1,3. 1. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 2. Division of Hematology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio. 3. Department of Paediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: Hydroxyurea has emerged as the primary disease-modifying therapy for patients with sickle cell anaemia (SCA). The laboratory and clinical benefits of hydroxyurea are optimal at maximum tolerated dose (MTD), but the current empirical dose escalation process often takes up to 12 months. The purpose of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic-guided dosing strategy to reduce the time required to reach hydroxyurea MTD in children with SCA. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the HUSTLE trial (NCT00305175) were used to develop a population PK model using non-linear mixed effects modelling (nonmem 7.2). A D-optimal sampling strategy was developed to estimate individual PK and hydroxyurea exposure (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)). The initial AUC target was derived from HUSTLE clinical data and defined as the mean AUC at MTD. RESULTS: PK profiles were best described by a one compartment with Michaelis-Menten elimination and a transit absorption model. Body weight and cystatin C were identified as significant predictors of hydroxyurea clearance. The following clinically feasible sampling times are included in a new prospective protocol: pre-dose (baseline), 15-20 min, 50-60 min and 3 h after an initial 20 mg kg(-1) oral dose. The mean target AUC(0,∞) for initial dose titration was 115 mg l(-1) h. CONCLUSION: We developed a PK model-based individualized dosing strategy for the prospective Therapeutic Response Evaluation and Adherence Trial (TREAT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02286154). This approach has the potential to optimize the dose titration of hydroxyurea therapy for children with SCA, such that the clinical benefits at MTD are achieved more quickly.
AIMS: Hydroxyurea has emerged as the primary disease-modifying therapy for patients with sickle cell anaemia (SCA). The laboratory and clinical benefits of hydroxyurea are optimal at maximum tolerated dose (MTD), but the current empirical dose escalation process often takes up to 12 months. The purpose of this study was to develop a pharmacokinetic-guided dosing strategy to reduce the time required to reach hydroxyurea MTD in children with SCA. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the HUSTLE trial (NCT00305175) were used to develop a population PK model using non-linear mixed effects modelling (nonmem 7.2). A D-optimal sampling strategy was developed to estimate individual PK and hydroxyurea exposure (area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)). The initial AUC target was derived from HUSTLE clinical data and defined as the mean AUC at MTD. RESULTS: PK profiles were best described by a one compartment with Michaelis-Menten elimination and a transit absorption model. Body weight and cystatin C were identified as significant predictors of hydroxyurea clearance. The following clinically feasible sampling times are included in a new prospective protocol: pre-dose (baseline), 15-20 min, 50-60 min and 3 h after an initial 20 mg kg(-1) oral dose. The mean target AUC(0,∞) for initial dose titration was 115 mg l(-1) h. CONCLUSION: We developed a PK model-based individualized dosing strategy for the prospective Therapeutic Response Evaluation and Adherence Trial (TREAT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02286154). This approach has the potential to optimize the dose titration of hydroxyurea therapy for children with SCA, such that the clinical benefits at MTD are achieved more quickly.
Authors: Barbara P Yawn; George R Buchanan; Araba N Afenyi-Annan; Samir K Ballas; Kathryn L Hassell; Andra H James; Lanetta Jordan; Sophie M Lanzkron; Richard Lottenberg; William J Savage; Paula J Tanabe; Russell E Ware; M Hassan Murad; Jonathan C Goldsmith; Eduardo Ortiz; Robinson Fulwood; Ann Horton; Joylene John-Sowah Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-09-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey R Scott; Joshua D Courter; Shannon N Saldaña; Brigitte C Widemann; Michael Fisher; Brian Weiss; John Perentesis; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Frédéric B Piel; Anand P Patil; Rosalind E Howes; Oscar A Nyangiri; Peter W Gething; Mewahyu Dewi; William H Temperley; Thomas N Williams; David J Weatherall; Simon I Hay Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Patrick T McGann; Omar Niss; Min Dong; Anu Marahatta; Thad A Howard; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Adam Lane; Theodosia A Kalfa; Punam Malik; Charles T Quinn; Russell E Ware; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Min Dong; Patrick T McGann; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Russell E Ware; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Min Dong; Tsuyoshi Fukuda; Sally Selim; Mark A Smith; Laura Rabinovich-Guilatt; James V Cassella; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Anu Marahatta; Vandana Megaraj; Patrick T McGann; Russell E Ware; Kenneth D R Setchell Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Min Dong; Patrick T McGann; Tomoyuki Mizuno; Russell E Ware; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Jeremie H Estepp; Paweł Wiczling; Joseph Moen; Guolian Kang; Joana Marie Mack; Robert Liem; Julie A Panepinto; Uttam Garg; Gregory Kearns; Kathleen A Neville Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Brian A Moser; Elizabeth S LaBell; Emmanuel Chigutsa; Joseph A Jakubowski; David S Small Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Madelyn C Huang; Katie J Turner; Molly Vallant; Veronica G Robinson; Yi Lu; Catherine J Price; Timothy R Fennell; Melanie A Silinski; Suramya Waidyanatha; Kristen R Ryan; Sherry R Black; Reshan A Fernando; Barry S McIntyre Journal: J Appl Toxicol Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 3.628