Literature DB >> 26613419

Computation of Hydration Free Energies Using the Multiple Environment Single System Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Method.

Gerhard König1, Ye Mei2,3, Frank C Pickard1, Andrew C Simmonett1, Benjamin T Miller1, John M Herbert4, H Lee Woodcock5, Bernard R Brooks1, Yihan Shao6.   

Abstract

A recently developed MESS-E-QM/MM method (multiple-environment single-system quantum mechanical molecular/mechanical calculations with a Roothaan-step extrapolation) is applied to the computation of hydration free energies for the blind SAMPL4 test set and for 12 small molecules. First, free energy simulations are performed with a classical molecular mechanics force field using fixed-geometry solute molecules and explicit TIP3P solvent, and then the non-Boltzmann-Bennett method is employed to compute the QM/MM correction (QM/MM-NBB) to the molecular mechanical hydration free energies. For the SAMPL4 set, MESS-E-QM/MM-NBB corrections to the hydration free energy can be obtained 2 or 3 orders of magnitude faster than fully converged QM/MM-NBB corrections, and, on average, the hydration free energies predicted with MESS-E-QM/MM-NBB fall within 0.10-0.20 kcal/mol of full-converged QM/MM-NBB results. Out of five density functionals (BLYP, B3LYP, PBE0, M06-2X, and ωB97X-D), the BLYP functional is found to be most compatible with the TIP3P solvent model and yields the most accurate hydration free energies against experimental values for solute molecules included in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26613419      PMCID: PMC5266607          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  47 in total

1.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview.

Authors:  Matthew T Geballe; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls; J Peter Guthrie; Peter J Taylor
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Density functional triple jumping.

Authors:  Jia Deng; Andrew T B Gilbert; Peter M W Gill
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  Improving Efficiency in SMD Simulations Through a Hybrid Differential Relaxation Algorithm.

Authors:  Claudia L Ramírez; Ari Zeida; Gabriel E Jara; Adrián E Roitberg; Marcelo A Martí
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Self-Consistent Reaction Field Model for Aqueous and Nonaqueous Solutions Based on Accurate Polarized Partial Charges.

Authors:  Aleksandr V Marenich; Ryan M Olson; Casey P Kelly; Christopher J Cramer; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Dual-basis analytic gradients. 1. Self-consistent field theory.

Authors:  Ryan P Steele; Yihan Shao; Robert A DiStasio; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 2.781

6.  Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics minimum free-energy path for accurate reaction energetics in solution and enzymes: sequential sampling and optimization on the potential of mean force surface.

Authors:  Hao Hu; Zhenyu Lu; Jerry M Parks; Steven K Burger; Weitao Yang
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-01-21       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Ken A Dill; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 8.  CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program.

Authors:  B R Brooks; C L Brooks; A D Mackerell; L Nilsson; R J Petrella; B Roux; Y Won; G Archontis; C Bartels; S Boresch; A Caflisch; L Caves; Q Cui; A R Dinner; M Feig; S Fischer; J Gao; M Hodoscek; W Im; K Kuczera; T Lazaridis; J Ma; V Ovchinnikov; E Paci; R W Pastor; C B Post; J Z Pu; M Schaefer; B Tidor; R M Venable; H L Woodcock; X Wu; W Yang; D M York; M Karplus
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview.

Authors:  J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 10.  Blind prediction of solvation free energies from the SAMPL4 challenge.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Karisa L Wymer; Nathan M Lim; J Peter Guthrie
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.686

View more
  16 in total

1.  An Estimation of Hybrid Quantum Mechanical Molecular Mechanical Polarization Energies for Small Molecules Using Polarizable Force-Field Approaches.

Authors:  Jing Huang; Ye Mei; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Frank C Pickard; Qin Wu; Lee-Ping Wang; Alexander D MacKerell; Bernard R Brooks; Yihan Shao
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Isotropic periodic sum for multipole interactions and a vector relation for calculation of the Cartesian multipole tensor.

Authors:  Xiongwu Wu; Frank C Pickard; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Multiscale Methods in Drug Design Bridge Chemical and Biological Complexity in the Search for Cures.

Authors:  Rommie E Amaro; Adrian J Mulholland
Journal:  Nat Rev Chem       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 34.035

4.  Calculating distribution coefficients based on multi-scale free energy simulations: an evaluation of MM and QM/MM explicit solvent simulations of water-cyclohexane transfer in the SAMPL5 challenge.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Frank C Pickard; Jing Huang; Andrew C Simmonett; Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Pavlo O Dral; Samarjeet Prasad; Michael Jones; Yihan Shao; Walter Thiel; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Blind prediction of distribution in the SAMPL5 challenge with QM based protomer and pK a corrections.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Florentina Tofoleanu; Juyong Lee; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Jay W Ponder; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  On the faithfulness of molecular mechanics representations of proteins towards quantum-mechanical energy surfaces.

Authors:  Gerhard König; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  An efficient protocol for obtaining accurate hydration free energies using quantum chemistry and reweighting from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Frank C Pickard; Gerhard König; Andrew C Simmonett; Yihan Shao; Bernard R Brooks
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Toward polarizable AMOEBA thermodynamics at fixed charge efficiency using a dual force field approach: application to organic crystals.

Authors:  Ian J Nessler; Jacob M Litman; Michael J Schnieders
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Use of Interaction Energies in QM/MM Free Energy Simulations.

Authors:  Phillip S Hudson; H Lee Woodcock; Stefan Boresch
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  A simplified charge projection scheme for long-range electrostatics in ab initio QM/MM calculations.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Pan; Kwangho Nam; Evgeny Epifanovsky; Andrew C Simmonett; Edina Rosta; Yihan Shao
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.