Literature DB >> 26609960

Role of Polarized G Protein Signaling in Tracking Pheromone Gradients.

Allison W McClure1, Maria Minakova2, Jayme M Dyer1, Trevin R Zyla1, Timothy C Elston3, Daniel J Lew4.   

Abstract

Yeast cells track gradients of pheromones to locate mating partners. Intuition suggests that uniform distribution of pheromone receptors over the cell surface would yield optimal gradient sensing. However, yeast cells display polarized receptors. The benefit of such polarization was unknown. During gradient tracking, cell growth is directed by a patch of polarity regulators that wanders around the cortex. Patch movement is sensitive to pheromone dose, with wandering reduced on the up-gradient side of the cell, resulting in net growth in that direction. Mathematical modeling suggests that active receptors and associated G proteins lag behind the polarity patch and act as an effective drag on patch movement. In vivo, the polarity patch is trailed by a G protein-rich domain, and this polarized distribution of G proteins is required to constrain patch wandering. Our findings explain why G protein polarization is beneficial and illuminate a novel mechanism for gradient tracking.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26609960      PMCID: PMC4661441          DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Cell        ISSN: 1534-5807            Impact factor:   12.270


  71 in total

Review 1.  To shape a cell: an inquiry into the causes of morphogenesis of microorganisms.

Authors:  F M Harold
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-12

2.  Endocytosis optimizes the dynamic localization of membrane proteins that regulate cortical polarity.

Authors:  Eugenio Marco; Roland Wedlich-Soldner; Rong Li; Steven J Altschuler; Lani F Wu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  S. cerevisiae alpha pheromone receptors activate a novel signal transduction pathway for mating partner discrimination.

Authors:  C L Jackson; J B Konopka; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-10-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Mechanisms of gradient detection: a comparison of axon pathfinding with eukaryotic cell migration.

Authors:  Anne von Philipsborn; Martin Bastmeyer
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  2007

5.  Regulation of the G-protein-coupled alpha-factor pheromone receptor by phosphorylation.

Authors:  Q Chen; J B Konopka
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  MAPK-mediated bimodal gene expression and adaptive gradient sensing in yeast.

Authors:  Saurabh Paliwal; Pablo A Iglesias; Kyle Campbell; Zoe Hilioti; Alex Groisman; Andre Levchenko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Polarization of yeast cells in spatial gradients of alpha mating factor.

Authors:  J E Segall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Direct evidence for ligand-induced internalization of the yeast alpha-factor pheromone receptor.

Authors:  K A Schandel; D D Jenness
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Specification of sites for polarized growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the influence of external factors on site selection.

Authors:  K Madden; M Snyder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  FAR1 is required for oriented polarization of yeast cells in response to mating pheromones.

Authors:  N Valtz; M Peter; I Herskowitz
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  34 in total

1.  Gradient Tracking by Yeast GPCRs in a Microfluidics Chamber.

Authors:  Sara Kimiko Suzuki; Joshua B Kelley; Timothy C Elston; Henrik G Dohlman
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Quantitative analysis of the yeast pheromone pathway.

Authors:  James P Shellhammer; Amy E Pomeroy; Yang Li; Lorena Dujmusic; Timothy C Elston; Nan Hao; Henrik G Dohlman
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Yeast chemotropism: A paradigm shift in chemical gradient sensing.

Authors:  Amber Ismael; David E Stone
Journal:  Cell Logist       Date:  2017-04-11

Review 4.  Cell Polarity in Yeast.

Authors:  Jian-Geng Chiou; Mohan K Balasubramanian; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 13.827

5.  Polarity establishment by Cdc42: Key roles for positive feedback and differential mobility.

Authors:  Benjamin Woods; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  Small GTPases       Date:  2017-03-30

6.  Mitotic and pheromone-specific intrinsic polarization cues interfere with gradient sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Gustavo Vasen; Paula Dunayevich; Alejandro Colman-Lerner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Local Pheromone Release from Dynamic Polarity Sites Underlies Cell-Cell Pairing during Yeast Mating.

Authors:  Laura Merlini; Bita Khalili; Felipe O Bendezú; Daniel Hurwitz; Vincent Vincenzetti; Dimitrios Vavylonis; Sophie G Martin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Gβ promotes pheromone receptor polarization and yeast chemotropism by inhibiting receptor phosphorylation.

Authors:  Amber Ismael; Wei Tian; Nicholas Waszczak; Xin Wang; Youfang Cao; Dmitry Suchkov; Eli Bar; Metodi V Metodiev; Jie Liang; Robert A Arkowitz; David E Stone
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 8.192

9.  Ratiometric GPCR signaling enables directional sensing in yeast.

Authors:  Nicholas T Henderson; Michael Pablo; Debraj Ghose; Manuella R Clark-Cotton; Trevin R Zyla; James Nolen; Timothy C Elston; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Systematic analysis of F-box proteins reveals a new branch of the yeast mating pathway.

Authors:  Nambirajan Rangarajan; Claire L Gordy; Lauren Askew; Samantha M Bevill; Timothy C Elston; Beverly Errede; Jillian H Hurst; Joshua B Kelley; Joshua B Sheetz; Sara Kimiko Suzuki; Natalie H Valentin; Everett Young; Henrik G Dohlman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.