Literature DB >> 31622333

Ratiometric GPCR signaling enables directional sensing in yeast.

Nicholas T Henderson1, Michael Pablo2,3, Debraj Ghose1, Manuella R Clark-Cotton1, Trevin R Zyla1, James Nolen4, Timothy C Elston5, Daniel J Lew1.   

Abstract

Accurate detection of extracellular chemical gradients is essential for many cellular behaviors. Gradient sensing is challenging for small cells, which can experience little difference in ligand concentrations on the up-gradient and down-gradient sides of the cell. Nevertheless, the tiny cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae reliably decode gradients of extracellular pheromones to find their mates. By imaging the behavior of polarity factors and pheromone receptors, we quantified the accuracy of initial polarization during mating encounters. We found that cells bias the orientation of initial polarity up-gradient, even though they have unevenly distributed receptors. Uneven receptor density means that the gradient of ligand-bound receptors does not accurately reflect the external pheromone gradient. Nevertheless, yeast cells appear to avoid being misled by responding to the fraction of occupied receptors rather than simply the concentration of ligand-bound receptors. Such ratiometric sensing also serves to amplify the gradient of active G protein. However, this process is quite error-prone, and initial errors are corrected during a subsequent indecisive phase in which polarity clusters exhibit erratic mobile behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31622333      PMCID: PMC6818790          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   8.029


  81 in total

1.  Slow diffusion of proteins in the yeast plasma membrane allows polarity to be maintained by endocytic cycling.

Authors:  Javier Valdez-Taubas; Hugh R B Pelham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Rho1p-Bni1p-Spa2p interactions: implication in localization of Bni1p at the bud site and regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T Fujiwara; K Tanaka; A Mino; M Kikyo; K Takahashi; K Shimizu; Y Takai
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.138

3.  Theoretical analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery experiments.

Authors:  D M Soumpasis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A GTP-exchange factor required for cell orientation.

Authors:  A Nern; R A Arkowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-01-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Single-cell quantification of molecules and rates using open-source microscope-based cytometry.

Authors:  Andrew Gordon; Alejandro Colman-Lerner; Tina E Chin; Kirsten R Benjamin; Richard C Yu; Roger Brent
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Polarization of the yeast pheromone receptor requires its internalization but not actin-dependent secretion.

Authors:  Dmitry V Suchkov; Reagan DeFlorio; Edward Draper; Amber Ismael; Madhushalini Sukumar; Robert Arkowitz; David E Stone
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Local Pheromone Release from Dynamic Polarity Sites Underlies Cell-Cell Pairing during Yeast Mating.

Authors:  Laura Merlini; Bita Khalili; Felipe O Bendezú; Daniel Hurwitz; Vincent Vincenzetti; Dimitrios Vavylonis; Sophie G Martin
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Comparison of dose-response curves for alpha factor-induced cell division arrest, agglutination, and projection formation of yeast cells. Implication for the mechanism of alpha factor action.

Authors:  S A Moore
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1983-11-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Polarization of cell growth in yeast. I. Establishment and maintenance of polarity states.

Authors:  D Pruyne; A Bretscher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Testing the limits of gradient sensing.

Authors:  Vinal Lakhani; Timothy C Elston
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of Experimental Approaches Used to Determine the Structure and Function of the Class D G Protein-Coupled Yeast α-Factor Receptor.

Authors:  Mark E Dumont; James B Konopka
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 2.  Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients.

Authors:  Debraj Ghose; Timothy Elston; Daniel Lew
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 19.763

3.  Mitotic and pheromone-specific intrinsic polarization cues interfere with gradient sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Gustavo Vasen; Paula Dunayevich; Alejandro Colman-Lerner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates.

Authors:  Debraj Ghose; Katherine Jacobs; Samuel Ramirez; Timothy Elston; Daniel Lew
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Molecular switch architecture determines response properties of signaling pathways.

Authors:  Khem Raj Ghusinga; Roger D Jones; Alan M Jones; Timothy C Elston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 6.  How Diffusion Impacts Cortical Protein Distribution in Yeasts.

Authors:  Kyle D Moran; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Pheromone Guidance of Polarity Site Movement in Yeast.

Authors:  Katherine C Jacobs; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-03-26

8.  Mechanistic insights into actin-driven polarity site movement in yeast.

Authors:  Debraj Ghose; Daniel Lew
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  Exploratory polarization facilitates mating partner selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Manuella R Clark-Cotton; Nicholas T Henderson; Michael Pablo; Debraj Ghose; Timothy C Elston; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.138

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.