Literature DB >> 26606551

Compressed Sensing 3-Dimensional Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Cerebral Aneurysms: Optimization and Evaluation.

Yasutaka Fushimi1, Koji Fujimoto, Tomohisa Okada, Akira Yamamoto, Toshiyuki Tanaka, Takayuki Kikuchi, Susumu Miyamoto, Kaori Togashi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to optimize parameters for Nesterov algorithm (NESTA) in reconstruction of 3-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T by performing an exhaustive search and to validate the performance of compressed sensing (CS) by applying it to data from cerebral aneurysms and evaluating diagnostic quality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional TOF-MRA was obtained using a 3 T MR system with a 32-channel head coil for both healthy volunteers and 10 patients (11 aneurysms). No undersampling was applied for imaging parameters, including parallel imaging or other partial Fourier sampling. In the first step, the experimental setup was for healthy subjects to optimize CS parameters of NESTA and the undersampling mask pattern, so 24,696 different reconstruction conditions were surveyed for sampling rates of 8.0X and 5.0X. Mean square error (MSE) was calculated for each image reconstructed with the undersampling pattern and CS parameter sets. Evaluation was by normalized MSE, edge sharpness for MRA reconstructed using fully sampled data (MRA-full), zero-filled MRA (ZF-MRA) with Poisson disk undersampling mask, and CS-MRA (5.0X and 8.0X) with iterations of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50. CS-MRA (5.0X and 8.0X) with 5, 10, and 50 iterations of the sampling pattern and CS parameter set with the lowest MSE were visually inspected by 2 neuroradiologists to check the diagnostic quality.
RESULTS: The sampling pattern and CS parameter set with the lowest MSE were identical for both CS-MRA 5.0X and CS-MRA 8.0X. At the initial 5 to 15 iterations, MSE of both sampling rates greatly decreased from that of ZF-MRA. For subsequent iterations, the decrease in MSE was relatively small. For CS-MRA, sharpness greatly increased from that of ZF-MRA within the initial 5 to 15 iterations, followed by slight increases with further iterations. Two neuroradiologists graded most aneurysms as excellent, with the exception of 1 to 4 aneurysms recognized as good by 1 observer in CS-MRA (8.0X).
CONCLUSIONS: Optimization of NESTA in the reconstruction of 3-dimensional TOF-MRA was conducted, and the parameters and undersampling mask with the lowest MSE were determined. Caliber measurement should be performed with CS (5.0X) with 25 or 30 iterations. Most cerebral aneurysms were sufficiently recognized using CS-MRA (5.0X) or CS-MRA (8.0X) with 10 iterations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26606551     DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  17 in total

Review 1.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Highly accelerated time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography using spiral imaging improves conspicuity of intracranial arterial branches while reducing scan time.

Authors:  Tobias Greve; Nico Sollmann; Andreas Hock; Silke Hey; Velmurugan Gnanaprakasam; Marco Nijenhuis; Claus Zimmer; Jan S Kirschke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  High spatial resolution whole-neck MR angiography using thin-slab stack-of-stars quiescent interval slice-selective acquisition.

Authors:  Ioannis Koktzoglou; Rong Huang; Archie L Ong; Pascale J Aouad; Matthew T Walker; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Accelerated Internal Auditory Canal Screening Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol With Compressed Sensing 3-Dimensional T2-Weighted Sequence.

Authors:  Mikell Yuhasz; Michael J Hoch; Mari Hagiwara; Mary T Bruno; James S Babb; Esther Raithel; Christoph Forman; Abbas Anwar; J Thomas Roland; Timothy M Shepherd
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Visualization of carotid vessel wall and atherosclerotic plaque: T1-SPACE vs. compressed sensing T1-SPACE.

Authors:  Sachi Okuchi; Yasutaka Fushimi; Tomohisa Okada; Akira Yamamoto; Tsutomu Okada; Takayuki Kikuchi; Kazumichi Yoshida; Susumu Miyamoto; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Golden-Angle Radial Sparse Parallel (GRASP) MRI differentiates head & neck paragangliomas from schwannomas.

Authors:  T Demerath; K Blackham; C Anastasopoulos; K T Block; B Stieltjes; T Schubert
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Sparse Reconstruction Techniques in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methods, Applications, and Challenges to Clinical Adoption.

Authors:  Alice C Yang; Madison Kretzler; Sonja Sudarski; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  Acceleration of Brain TOF-MRA with Compressed Sensitivity Encoding: A Multicenter Clinical Study.

Authors:  J Ding; Y Duan; Z Zhuo; Y Yuan; G Zhang; Q Song; B Gao; B Zhang; M Wang; L Yang; Y Hou; J Yuan; C Feng; J Wang; L Lin; Y Liu
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.966

9.  Compressed sensing time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with high spatial resolution for evaluating intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Donghyun Kim; Young Jin Heo; Hae Woong Jeong; Jin Wook Baek; Gi Won Shin; Sung-Chul Jin; Hye Jin Baek; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Kang Soo Kim; InSeong Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-01-18

10.  Magnetic resonance angiography with compressed sensing: An evaluation of moyamoya disease.

Authors:  Takayuki Yamamoto; Tomohisa Okada; Yasutaka Fushimi; Akira Yamamoto; Koji Fujimoto; Sachi Okuchi; Hikaru Fukutomi; Jun C Takahashi; Takeshi Funaki; Susumu Miyamoto; Aurélien F Stalder; Yutaka Natsuaki; Peter Speier; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.