Literature DB >> 26602005

Decreasing the Preincision Time for Pulmonary Lobectomy: The Process of Lean and Value Stream Mapping.

Robert James Cerfolio1, Brad L Steenwyk2, Caroline Watson2, James Sparrow2, Victoria Belopolsky2, Matthew Townsley2, Ralph Lyerly2, Michelle Downing2, Ayesha Bryant3, William Quinton Gurley2, Colleen Henling2, Jack Crawford2, Thomas E Gayeski2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to evaluate our results after the implementation of lean (the elimination of wasteful parts of a process).
METHODS: After meetings with our anesthesiologists, we standardized our "in the operating room-to-skin incision protocols" before pulmonary lobectomy. Patients were divided into consecutive cohorts of 300 lobectomy patients. Several protocols were slowly adopted and outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: One surgeon performed 2,206 pulmonary lobectomies, of which 84% were for cancer. Protocols for lateral decubitus positioning changed over time. We eliminated axillary rolls, arm boards, and beanbags. Monitoring devices were slowly eliminated. Central catheters decreased from 75% to 0% of patients, epidurals from 84% to 3%, arterial catheters from 93% to 4%, and finally, Foley catheters were reduced from 99% to 11% (p ≤ 0.001 for all). A protocol for the insertion of double-lumen endotracheal tubes was established and times decreased (mean, 14 minutes to 1 minute; p = 0.001). After all changes were made, the time between operating room entry and incision decreased from a mean of 64 minutes to 37 minutes (p < 0.001). Outcomes improved, mortality decreased from 3.2% to 0.26% (p = 0.015), and major morbidity decreased from 15.2% to 5.3% (p = 0.042).
CONCLUSIONS: Lean and value stream mapping can be safely applied to the clinical algorithms of high-risk patient care. We demonstrate that elimination of non-value-added steps can safely decrease preincision time without increasing patient risk in patients who undergo pulmonary lobectomy. Selected centers may be able to adopt some of these lean-driven protocols.
Copyright © 2016 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26602005     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

Review 1.  Thymic minimally invasive surgery: state of the art across the world: Central-South America.

Authors:  Ricardo Mingarini Terra
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-09-14

Review 2.  Tips and tricks to decrease the duration of operation in robotic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Omar I Ramadan; Robert J Cerfolio; Benjamin Wei
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-02-13

3.  Non-small cell lung cancer 2 cm or less: robotic segmentectomy sets the gold standard against non-surgical therapy.

Authors:  Dana Ferrari-Light; Robert J Cerfolio
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

Review 4.  The Role of Value Stream Mapping in Healthcare Services: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Juan A Marin-Garcia; Pilar I Vidal-Carreras; Julio J Garcia-Sabater
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Systematic Review of Interventions to Reduce Operating Time in Lung Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Paulien C Hoefsmit; Robert J Cerfolio; Ralph de Vries; Max Dahele; H Reinier Zandbergen
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 6.  Standardization of Procedures to Contain Cost and Reduce Variability of Care After the Pandemic.

Authors:  Federico Raveglia; Riccardo Orlandi; Arianna Rimessi; Fabrizio Minervini; Ugo Cioffi; Matilde De Simone; Angelo Guttadauro; Marco Scarci
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.