Literature DB >> 29078574

Tips and tricks to decrease the duration of operation in robotic surgery for lung cancer.

Omar I Ramadan1, Robert J Cerfolio1, Benjamin Wei1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for lung cancer has been associated with decreased perioperative morbidity while maintaining similar long-term survival when compared to open thoracotomy. Robotic thoracic surgery constitutes an evolutionary step in this field, beckoning dramatic advancements both in visualization as well as surgical instrument range of motion and ergonomics. As such, robotic thoracic surgery is growing in adoption worldwide. One of its oft-cited disadvantages, however, is increased operative time, especially for less-experienced surgeons. We describe an assortment of tips and tricks that we conclude can safely reduce robotic operative duration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lung cancer surgery; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); operative duration; robotic surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078574      PMCID: PMC5638299          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2017.01.04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  19 in total

1.  What does one minute of operating room time cost?

Authors:  Alex Macario
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.452

2.  The 30- versus 90-day operative mortality after pulmonary resection.

Authors:  Ayesha S Bryant; Kyle Rudemiller; Robert J Cerfolio
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Robotic-Assisted Videothoracoscopic Surgery of the Lung.

Authors:  Frank O Velez-Cubian; Emily P Ng; Jacques P Fontaine; Eric M Toloza
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 4.  The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections.

Authors:  Gaetano Rocco; Eveline Internullo; Stephen D Cassivi; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Mark K Ferguson
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

5.  Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms.

Authors:  Robert J Cerfolio; Ayesha S Bryant; Loki Skylizard; Douglas James Minnich
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Robotic lobectomy for lung cancer: evolution in technique and technology.

Authors:  Franca M A Melfi; Olivia Fanucchi; Federico Davini; Gaetano Romano; Marco Lucchi; Paolo Dini; Marcello C Ambrogi; Alfredo Mussi
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 7.  VATS-based approach for robotic lobectomy.

Authors:  Franca M A Melfi; Olivia Fanucchi; Federico Davini; Alfredo Mussi
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.750

8.  Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages?

Authors:  Benjamin E Lee; Robert J Korst; Elaine Kletsman; John R Rutledge
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay.

Authors:  Levi D Procter; Daniel L Davenport; Andrew C Bernard; Joseph B Zwischenberger
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 10.  Systematic review of published studies on safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic and robot-assisted lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshige Nakamura
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 1.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.