Paulien C Hoefsmit1, Robert J Cerfolio2, Ralph de Vries3, Max Dahele4, H Reinier Zandbergen1. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, USA. 3. Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Operating rooms are a scarce resource but often used inefficiently. Operating room efficiency emerges as an important part of maximizing surgical capacity and productivity, minimizing delays, and optimizing lung cancer outcomes. The operative time (time between patient entering and leaving the operating room) is discrete and the one that the surgical team can most directly influence. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the literature and identify methods to improve the efficiency of the intraoperative phase of operations for lung cancer. METHODS: A literature search (in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus) was performed from inception up to March 9, 2020, according to the methodology described in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: We identified 3 articles relevant to the intraoperative phase of lung cancer operating room efficiency. All 3 were consistent in showing clinically relevant time reductions in the intraoperative phase or procedures relevant to this phase. The authors demonstrated that the application of various improvement methodologies resulted in a substantial reduction in operative time, which was associated with a reduction in complications, and improved staff morale. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review found that various improvement methodologies have the potential to significantly reduce operative time for lung cancer surgery. This increases the value of lung cancer surgery. These findings are consistent with the wider literature on improving surgical efficiency.
INTRODUCTION: Operating rooms are a scarce resource but often used inefficiently. Operating room efficiency emerges as an important part of maximizing surgical capacity and productivity, minimizing delays, and optimizing lung cancer outcomes. The operative time (time between patient entering and leaving the operating room) is discrete and the one that the surgical team can most directly influence. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the literature and identify methods to improve the efficiency of the intraoperative phase of operations for lung cancer. METHODS: A literature search (in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus) was performed from inception up to March 9, 2020, according to the methodology described in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: We identified 3 articles relevant to the intraoperative phase of lung cancer operating room efficiency. All 3 were consistent in showing clinically relevant time reductions in the intraoperative phase or procedures relevant to this phase. The authors demonstrated that the application of various improvement methodologies resulted in a substantial reduction in operative time, which was associated with a reduction in complications, and improved staff morale. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review found that various improvement methodologies have the potential to significantly reduce operative time for lung cancer surgery. This increases the value of lung cancer surgery. These findings are consistent with the wider literature on improving surgical efficiency.
Authors: Robert R Cima; Michael J Brown; James R Hebl; Robin Moore; James C Rogers; Anantha Kollengode; Gwendolyn J Amstutz; Cheryl A Weisbrod; Bradly J Narr; Claude Deschamps Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Charles Coffey; Edward S Cho; Eric Wei; Allison Luu; Maria Ho; Rodolfo Amaya; Marie Pecson; Florence V Dalton; Deborah Kahaku; Brad Spellberg; Stephen F Sener Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Robert J Cerfolio; Dana Ferrari-Light; Christine Ren-Fielding; George Fielding; Nissa Perry; Annette Rabinovich; Mark Saraceni; Maureen Fitzpatrick; Sudheer Jain; H Leon Pachter Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Blake C Alkire; Nakul P Raykar; Mark G Shrime; Thomas G Weiser; Stephen W Bickler; John A Rose; Cameron T Nutt; Sarah L M Greenberg; Meera Kotagal; Johanna N Riesel; Micaela Esquivel; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; George Molina; Nobhojit Roy; John G Meara; Paul E Farmer Journal: Lancet Glob Health Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 26.763
Authors: Ashanya Malalasekera; Sharon Nahm; Prunella L Blinman; Steven C Kao; Haryana M Dhillon; Janette L Vardy Journal: Eur Respir Rev Date: 2018-08-29
Authors: Robert J Cerfolio; Benjamin Smood; Asem Ghanim; Matthew M Townsley; Michelle Downing Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 4.330