Literature DB >> 16824816

Low-level mechanical vibrations can influence bone resorption and bone formation in the growing skeleton.

Liqin Xie1, Jeffrey M Jacobson1, Edna S Choi1, Bhavin Busa1, Leah Rae Donahue2, Lisa M Miller3, Clinton T Rubin1, Stefan Judex4.   

Abstract

Short durations of extremely small magnitude, high-frequency, mechanical stimuli can promote anabolic activity in the adult skeleton. Here, it is determined if such signals can influence trabecular and cortical formative and resorptive activity in the growing skeleton, if the newly formed bone is of high quality, and if the insertion of rest periods during the loading phase would enhance the efficacy of the mechanical regimen. Eight-week-old female BALB/cByJ mice were divided into four groups, baseline control (n = 8), age-matched control (n = 10), whole-body vibration (WBV) at 45 Hz (0.3 g) for 15 min day(-1) (n = 10), and WBV that were interrupted every second by 10 of rest (WBV-R, n = 10). In vivo strain gaging of two additional mice indicated that the mechanical signal induced strain oscillations of approximately 10 microstrain on the periosteal surface of the proximal tibia. After 3 weeks of WBV, applied for 15 min each day, osteoclastic activity in the trabecular metaphysis and epiphysis of the tibia was 33% and 31% lower (P <0.05) than in age-matched controls. Bone formation rates (BFR.BS(-1)) on the endocortical surface of the metaphysis were 30% greater (P <0.05) in WBV than in age-matched control mice but trabecular and middiaphyseal BFR were not significantly altered. The insertion of rest periods (WBV-R) failed to potentiate the cellular effects. Three weeks of either WBV or WBV-R did not negatively influence body mass, bone length, or chemical bone matrix properties of the tibia. These data indicate that in the growing skeleton, short daily periods of extremely small, high-frequency mechanical signals can inhibit trabecular bone resorption, site specifically attenuate the declining levels of bone formation, and maintain a high level of matrix quality. If WBV prove to be efficacious in the growing human skeleton, they may be able to provide the basis for a non-pharmacological and safe means to increase peak bone mass and, ultimately, reduce the incidence of osteoporosis or stress fractures later in life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16824816     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  85 in total

1.  Comparative vibration levels perceived among species in a laboratory animal facility.

Authors:  John N Norton; Will L Kinard; Randall P Reynolds
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Mechanical vibration inhibits osteoclast formation by reducing DC-STAMP receptor expression in osteoclast precursor cells.

Authors:  Rishikesh N Kulkarni; Philip A Voglewede; Dawei Liu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Mechanical stimulation of mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation promotes osteogenesis while preventing dietary-induced obesity.

Authors:  Yen Kim Luu; Encarnacion Capilla; Clifford J Rosen; Vicente Gilsanz; Jeffrey E Pessin; Stefan Judex; Clinton T Rubin
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Extremely small-magnitude accelerations enhance bone regeneration: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Soon Jung Hwang; Svetlana Lublinsky; Young-Kwon Seo; In Sook Kim; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Vibration as an exercise modality: how it may work, and what its potential might be.

Authors:  Jörn Rittweger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Dynamic fluid flow induced mechanobiological modulation of in situ osteocyte calcium oscillations.

Authors:  Minyi Hu; Guo-Wei Tian; Daniel E Gibbons; Jian Jiao; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 7.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The effects of photobiomodulation and low-amplitude high-frequency vibration on bone healing process: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Rajaei Jafarabadi; G Rouhi; G Kaka; S H Sadraie; J Arum
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Joint loading-driven bone formation and signaling pathways predicted from genome-wide expression profiles.

Authors:  Ping Zhang; Charles H Turner; Hiroki Yokota
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Adipogenesis is inhibited by brief, daily exposure to high-frequency, extremely low-magnitude mechanical signals.

Authors:  C T Rubin; E Capilla; Y K Luu; B Busa; H Crawford; D J Nolan; V Mittal; C J Rosen; J E Pessin; S Judex
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.