Literature DB >> 26597793

Impact of whole-body MRI in a general population study.

Carsten Oliver Schmidt1, Elizabeth Sierocinski2,3, Katrin Hegenscheid4, Sebastian E Baumeister2,5, Hans J Grabe6, Henry Völzke2.   

Abstract

This study examined the long-term impact of whole-body MRI and the disclosure of incidental findings on quality of life (QoL) and depressive symptoms in a general population cohort. Analyses were conducted among 4420 participants of the Study of Health in Pomerania SHIP-Trend cohort, of which 2188 received a whole-body MRI examination. A 2.5-year postal follow-up of SHIP-Trend (response: 86%) included the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), based on which the Mental Health Component Summary Score (MCS), and Physical Health Component Summary Score (PCS) were computed. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) was applied to assess depressive symptoms. Generalized estimation equation models were used to assess intervention effects, and statistical weights were applied to account for selective attrition. MRI participants had higher levels of education and employment than nonparticipants. Mean QoL indicators differed little at baseline between MRI participants and nonparticipants. Intervention effects per year on depression and QoL were negligible in (1) MRI participants versus nonparticipants [PCS: unstandardized β = -0.06 (95% CI -0.30 to 0.18); MCS: β = -0.01 (95% CI -0.29 to 0.29); PHQ-9: 0.08 (-0.03 to 0.18)], and (2) MRI participants with a disclosed incidental finding versus those without [PCS: β = -0.03 (-0.39 to 0.33); MCS: β = -0.26 (95% CI -0.65 to 0.13); PHQ-9: 0.03 (-0.10 to 0.15)]. The body site of the finding had only minor effects on the course of our studied outcomes. Whole-body MRI can be implemented in a population-based study without long-term effects on QoL indicators and depressive symptoms. This does not exclude the possibility of effects on more subtle psychosocial outcomes, such as health concerns or health behaviour, all of which require further attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; General health screening; General population; Incidental findings; Magnetic resonance imaging; Quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26597793     DOI: 10.1007/s10654-015-0101-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  32 in total

1.  Incidental head and neck findings on MRI in young healthy volunteers: prevalence and clinical implications.

Authors:  L Reneman; M M L de Win; J Booij; W van den Brink; G J den Heeten; N Freling; C B L M Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  The risks and benefits of searching for incidental findings in MRI research scans.

Authors:  Jason M Royal; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 3.  Mammography screening from the perspective of quality of life: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Bjørg Hafslund; Monica W Nortvedt
Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci       Date:  2009-01-08

4.  Cohort profile: the study of health in Pomerania.

Authors:  Henry Völzke; Dietrich Alte; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Dörte Radke; Roberto Lorbeer; Nele Friedrich; Nicole Aumann; Katharina Lau; Michael Piontek; Gabriele Born; Christoph Havemann; Till Ittermann; Sabine Schipf; Robin Haring; Sebastian E Baumeister; Henri Wallaschofski; Matthias Nauck; Stephanie Frick; Andreas Arnold; Michael Jünger; Julia Mayerle; Matthias Kraft; Markus M Lerch; Marcus Dörr; Thorsten Reffelmann; Klaus Empen; Stephan B Felix; Anne Obst; Beate Koch; Sven Gläser; Ralf Ewert; Ingo Fietze; Thomas Penzel; Martina Dören; Wolfgang Rathmann; Johannes Haerting; Mario Hannemann; Jürgen Röpcke; Ulf Schminke; Clemens Jürgens; Frank Tost; Rainer Rettig; Jan A Kors; Saskia Ungerer; Katrin Hegenscheid; Jens-Peter Kühn; Julia Kühn; Norbert Hosten; Ralf Puls; Jörg Henke; Oliver Gloger; Alexander Teumer; Georg Homuth; Uwe Völker; Christian Schwahn; Birte Holtfreter; Ines Polzer; Thomas Kohlmann; Hans J Grabe; Dieter Rosskopf; Heyo K Kroemer; Thomas Kocher; Reiner Biffar; Ulrich John; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 5.  Adult measures of general health and health-related quality of life: Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) and Short Form 12-Item (SF-12) Health Surveys, Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6D (SF-6D), Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3), Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), and Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL).

Authors:  Lucy Busija; Eva Pausenberger; Terry P Haines; Sharon Haymes; Rachelle Buchbinder; Richard H Osborne
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

6.  Psychosocial consequences and severity of disclosed incidental findings from whole-body MRI in a general population study.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Katrin Hegenscheid; Pia Erdmann; Thomas Kohlmann; Martin Langanke; Henry Völzke; Ralf Puls; Heinrich Assel; Reiner Biffar; Hans Jörgen Grabe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  [The German National Cohort].

Authors:  H-E Wichmann; R Kaaks; W Hoffmann; K-H Jöckel; K H Greiser; J Linseisen
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Potentially relevant incidental findings on research whole-body MRI in the general adult population: frequencies and management.

Authors:  Katrin Hegenscheid; Rebecca Seipel; Carsten O Schmidt; Henry Völzke; Jens-Peter Kühn; Reiner Biffar; Heyo K Kroemer; Norbert Hosten; Ralf Puls
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Case-finding for depressive and exhausted mood in the general population: reliability and validity of a symptom-driven diagnostic scale. Results from the prospective MONICA/KORA Augsburg Study.

Authors:  Karl-Heinz Ladwig; Birgitt Marten-Mittag; Jens Baumert; Hannelore Löwel; Angela Döring
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.797

10.  Incidental findings on brain MR imaging in older community-dwelling subjects are common but serious medical consequences are rare: a cohort study.

Authors:  Elaine M Sandeman; Maria Del Carmen Valdes Hernandez; Zoe Morris; Mark E Bastin; Catherine Murray; Alan J Gow; Janie Corley; Ross Henderson; Ian J Deary; John M Starr; Joanna M Wardlaw
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results.

Authors:  M Arfan Ikram; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Stricker; Henning Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij; Albert Hofman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Evaluating diagnostic accuracy and determining optimal diagnostic thresholds of different approaches to [68Ga]-DOTATATE PET/MRI analysis in patients with meningioma.

Authors:  Sean H Kim; Michelle Roytman; Gabriela Madera; Rajiv S Magge; Benjamin Liechty; Rohan Ramakrishna; Susan C Pannullo; Theodore H Schwartz; Nicolas A Karakatsanis; Joseph R Osborne; Eaton Lin; Jonathan P S Knisely; Jana Ivanidze
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Whole-body MRI for preventive health screening: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Effects of whole-body MRI on outpatient health service costs: a general-population prospective cohort study in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Elizabeth Sierocinski; Sebastian Baumeister; Katrin Hegenscheid; Henry Völzke; J-F Chenot
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Screening of cancer predisposition syndromes.

Authors:  Haifa Al-Sarhani; Ravi V Gottumukkala; Angelo Don S Grasparil; Eric L Tung; Michael S Gee; Mary-Louise C Greer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 6.  Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for cancer screening in asymptomatic subjects of the general population: review and recommendations.

Authors:  Fabio Zugni; Anwar Roshanali Padhani; Dow-Mu Koh; Paul Eugene Summers; Massimo Bellomi; Giuseppe Petralia
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  Reference values for the cervical spinal canal and the vertebral bodies by MRI in a general population.

Authors:  Christopher Nell; Robin Bülow; Norbert Hosten; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Katrin Hegenscheid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Psychosocial effects of whole-body MRI screening in adult high-risk pathogenic TP53 mutation carriers: a case-controlled study (SIGNIFY).

Authors:  Elizabeth K Bancroft; Sibel Saya; Emma Brown; Sarah Thomas; Natalie Taylor; Jeanette Rothwell; Jennifer Pope; Anthony Chamberlain; Elizabeth Page; Sarah Benafif; Helen Hanson; Alexander Dias; Christos Mikropoulos; Louise Izatt; Lucy Side; Lisa Walker; Alan Donaldson; Jackie A Cook; Julian Barwell; Vicki Wiles; Lauren Limb; Diana M Eccles; Martin O Leach; Susan Shanley; Fiona J Gilbert; David Gallagher; Balashanmugam Rajashanker; Richard W Whitehouse; Dow-Mu Koh; S Aslam Sohaib; D Gareth Evans; Rosalind A Eeles; Leslie G Walker
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 9.  Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) for cancer screening: recommendations for use.

Authors:  Giuseppe Petralia; Fabio Zugni; Paul E Summers; Alberto Colombo; Paola Pricolo; Luigi Grazioli; Stefano Colagrande; Andrea Giovagnoni; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.469

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.