OBJECTIVES: To report the frequencies of potentially relevant incidental findings in the general adult population and to develop a protocol for their management in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI). METHODS: A total of 2,500 adult subjects (1,271 women, 1,229 men; mean age 53 years) from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania underwent standardised wb-MRI. Additionally, 1,129 participants received contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI, 619 men received MR angiography and 544 women received MR mammography. Two independent residents performed first-line reading. A third reader resolved disagreements. An interdisciplinary advisory board decided about disclosure. RESULTS: There were 1,330 incidental findings of potential clinical relevance in 904 subjects (36.2 %). Nine findings (0.4 %) required immediate referral. In total, 1,052 findings (79.1 %) were confirmed by the advisory board and disclosed to 787 participants (31.5 %). The abdominal organs (6.8 %), the urinary tract (6.8 %) and the skeletal system (6.0 %) were affected most often. While 383 findings (36.4 %) were indicated as benign and 62 (5.9 %) as malignant, most abnormalities, 607 (57.7 %), were of an unclear nature. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially relevant incidental findings are very common in wb-MRI research but the nature of these findings remains unclear in most cases. This requires dedicated management to protect subjects' welfare and research integrity.
OBJECTIVES: To report the frequencies of potentially relevant incidental findings in the general adult population and to develop a protocol for their management in whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI). METHODS: A total of 2,500 adult subjects (1,271 women, 1,229 men; mean age 53 years) from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania underwent standardised wb-MRI. Additionally, 1,129 participants received contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI, 619 men received MR angiography and 544 women received MR mammography. Two independent residents performed first-line reading. A third reader resolved disagreements. An interdisciplinary advisory board decided about disclosure. RESULTS: There were 1,330 incidental findings of potential clinical relevance in 904 subjects (36.2 %). Nine findings (0.4 %) required immediate referral. In total, 1,052 findings (79.1 %) were confirmed by the advisory board and disclosed to 787 participants (31.5 %). The abdominal organs (6.8 %), the urinary tract (6.8 %) and the skeletal system (6.0 %) were affected most often. While 383 findings (36.4 %) were indicated as benign and 62 (5.9 %) as malignant, most abnormalities, 607 (57.7 %), were of an unclear nature. CONCLUSIONS: Potentially relevant incidental findings are very common in wb-MRI research but the nature of these findings remains unclear in most cases. This requires dedicated management to protect subjects' welfare and research integrity.
Authors: Sanjiv Kumra; Manzar Ashtari; Britt Anderson; Kelly L Cervellione; L I Kan Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: J Illes; M P Kirschen; E Edwards; P Bandettini; M K Cho; P J Ford; G H Glover; J Kulynych; R Macklin; D B Michael; S M Wolf; T Grabowski; B Seto Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-01-29 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Henry Völzke; Dietrich Alte; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Dörte Radke; Roberto Lorbeer; Nele Friedrich; Nicole Aumann; Katharina Lau; Michael Piontek; Gabriele Born; Christoph Havemann; Till Ittermann; Sabine Schipf; Robin Haring; Sebastian E Baumeister; Henri Wallaschofski; Matthias Nauck; Stephanie Frick; Andreas Arnold; Michael Jünger; Julia Mayerle; Matthias Kraft; Markus M Lerch; Marcus Dörr; Thorsten Reffelmann; Klaus Empen; Stephan B Felix; Anne Obst; Beate Koch; Sven Gläser; Ralf Ewert; Ingo Fietze; Thomas Penzel; Martina Dören; Wolfgang Rathmann; Johannes Haerting; Mario Hannemann; Jürgen Röpcke; Ulf Schminke; Clemens Jürgens; Frank Tost; Rainer Rettig; Jan A Kors; Saskia Ungerer; Katrin Hegenscheid; Jens-Peter Kühn; Julia Kühn; Norbert Hosten; Ralf Puls; Jörg Henke; Oliver Gloger; Alexander Teumer; Georg Homuth; Uwe Völker; Christian Schwahn; Birte Holtfreter; Ines Polzer; Thomas Kohlmann; Hans J Grabe; Dieter Rosskopf; Heyo K Kroemer; Thomas Kocher; Reiner Biffar; Ulrich John; Wolfgang Hoffmann Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Michael Fenchel; Martin Requardt; Katrin Tomaschko; Ulrich Kramer; Norbert I Stauder; Thomas Naegele; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Marielle W G Ruijs; Claudette E Loo; Colette A J M van Buchem; Eveline M A Bleiker; Gabe S Sonke Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Katrin Hegenscheid; Pia Erdmann; Thomas Kohlmann; Martin Langanke; Henry Völzke; Ralf Puls; Heinrich Assel; Reiner Biffar; Hans Jörgen Grabe Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Maite Millor; Pablo Bartolomé; Maria José Pons; Gorka Bastarrika; Óscar Beloqui; David Cano; Ignacio González; Isabel Vivas Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Cornelius Sebastian Fischer; Jens-Peter Kühn; Till Ittermann; Carsten-Oliver Schmidt; Denis Gümbel; Richard Kasch; Matthias Frank; René Laqua; Peter Hinz; Jörn Lange Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.176