Literature DB >> 26596620

Comparison of Cellulose Iβ Simulations with Three Carbohydrate Force Fields.

James F Matthews, Gregg T Beckham1, Malin Bergenstråhle-Wohlert2,3, John W Brady2, Michael E Himmel, Michael F Crowley.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations of cellulose have recently become more prevalent due to increased interest in renewable energy applications, and many atomistic and coarse-grained force fields exist that can be applied to cellulose. However, to date no systematic comparison between carbohydrate force fields has been conducted for this important system. To that end, we present a molecular dynamics simulation study of hydrated, 36-chain cellulose Iβ microfibrils at room temperature with three carbohydrate force fields (CHARMM35, GLYCAM06, and Gromos 45a4) up to the near-microsecond time scale. Our results indicate that each of these simulated microfibrils diverge from the cellulose Iβ crystal structure to varying degrees under the conditions tested. The CHARMM35 and GLYCAM06 force fields eventually result in structures similar to those observed at 500 K with the same force fields, which are consistent with the experimentally observed high-temperature behavior of cellulose I. The third force field, Gromos 45a4, produces behavior significantly different from experiment, from the other two force fields, and from previously reported simulations with this force field using shorter simulation times and constrained periodic boundary conditions. For the GLYCAM06 force field, initial hydrogen-bond conformations and choice of electrostatic scaling factors significantly affect the rate of structural divergence. Our results suggest dramatically different time scales for convergence of properties of interest, which is important in the design of computational studies and comparisons to experimental data. This study highlights that further experimental and theoretical work is required to understand the structure of small diameter cellulose microfibrils typical of plant cellulose.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 26596620     DOI: 10.1021/ct2007692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  13 in total

1.  Unique aspects of the structure and dynamics of elementary Iβ cellulose microfibrils revealed by computational simulations.

Authors:  Daniel P Oehme; Matthew T Downton; Monika S Doblin; John Wagner; Michael J Gidley; Antony Bacic
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Predicting the Structures of Glycans, Glycoproteins, and Their Complexes.

Authors:  Robert J Woods
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Optimizing Solute-Solute Interactions in the GLYCAM06 and CHARMM36 Carbohydrate Force Fields Using Osmotic Pressure Measurements.

Authors:  Wesley K Lay; Mark S Miller; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Crystal structure and computational characterization of the lytic polysaccharide monooxygenase GH61D from the Basidiomycota fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

Authors:  Miao Wu; Gregg T Beckham; Anna M Larsson; Takuya Ishida; Seonah Kim; Christina M Payne; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley; Svein J Horn; Bjørge Westereng; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Masahiro Samejima; Jerry Ståhlberg; Vincent G H Eijsink; Mats Sandgren
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Unraveling cellulose microfibrils: a twisted tale.

Authors:  Jodi A Hadden; Alfred D French; Robert J Woods
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Effect of microfibril twisting on theoretical powder diffraction patterns of cellulose Iβ

Authors:  Jodi A Hadden; Alfred D French; Robert J Woods
Journal:  Cellulose (Lond)       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.044

7.  Binding preferences, surface attachment, diffusivity, and orientation of a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module on cellulose.

Authors:  Mark R Nimlos; Gregg T Beckham; James F Matthews; Lintao Bu; Michael E Himmel; Michael F Crowley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Building an extensible cell wall.

Authors:  Daniel J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.005

9.  Structure of cellulose microfibrils in primary cell walls from collenchyma.

Authors:  Lynne H Thomas; V Trevor Forsyth; Adriana Sturcová; Craig J Kennedy; Roland P May; Clemens M Altaner; David C Apperley; Timothy J Wess; Michael C Jarvis
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Molecular modeling and imaging of initial stages of cellulose fibril assembly: evidence for a disordered intermediate stage.

Authors:  Candace H Haigler; Mark J Grimson; Julien Gervais; Nicolas Le Moigne; Herman Höfte; Bernard Monasse; Patrick Navard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.