Literature DB >> 23681971

Unraveling cellulose microfibrils: a twisted tale.

Jodi A Hadden1, Alfred D French, Robert J Woods.   

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of cellulose microfibrils are pertinent to the paper, textile, and biofuels industries for their unique capacity to characterize dynamic behavior and atomic-level interactions with solvent molecules and cellulase enzymes. While high-resolution crystallographic data have established a solid basis for computational analysis of cellulose, previous work has demonstrated a tendency for modeled microfibrils to diverge from the linear experimental structure and adopt a twisted conformation. Here, we investigate the dependence of this twisting behavior on computational approximations and establish the theoretical basis for its occurrence. We examine the role of solvent, the effect of nonbonded force field parameters [partial charges and van der Waals (vdW) contributions], and the use of explicitly modeled oxygen lone pairs in both the solute and solvent. Findings suggest that microfibril twisting is favored by vdW interactions, and counteracted by both intrachain hydrogen bonds and solvent effects at the microfibril surface.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLYCAM; cellulose; microfibril twist; molecular dynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23681971      PMCID: PMC3936462          DOI: 10.1002/bip.22279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  25 in total

1.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 2. Explicit Solvent Particle Mesh Ewald.

Authors:  Romelia Salomon-Ferrer; Andreas W Götz; Duncan Poole; Scott Le Grand; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Molecular dynamics simulations of solvated crystal models of cellulose I(alpha) and III(I).

Authors:  Toshifumi Yui; Sachio Hayashi
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 6.988

3.  High-temperature behavior of cellulose I.

Authors:  James F Matthews; Malin Bergenstråhle; Gregg T Beckham; Michael E Himmel; Mark R Nimlos; John W Brady; Michael F Crowley
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  The energy landscape for the interaction of the family 1 carbohydrate-binding module and the cellulose surface is altered by hydrolyzed glycosidic bonds.

Authors:  Lintao Bu; Gregg T Beckham; Michael F Crowley; Christopher H Chang; James F Matthews; Yannick J Bomble; William S Adney; Michael E Himmel; Mark R Nimlos
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  Improving the description of salt bridge strength and geometry in a Generalized Born model.

Authors:  Yi Shang; Hai Nguyen; Lauren Wickstrom; Asim Okur; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 2.518

6.  On the Role of Water Models in Quantifying the Binding Free Energy of Highly Conserved Water Molecules in Proteins: The Case of Concanavalin A.

Authors:  Elisa Fadda; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.006

7.  Restrained electrostatic potential atomic partial charges for condensed-phase simulations of carbohydrates.

Authors:  R J Woods; R Chappelle
Journal:  Theochem       Date:  2000-08

8.  GLYCAM06: a generalizable biomolecular force field. Carbohydrates.

Authors:  Karl N Kirschner; Austin B Yongye; Sarah M Tschampel; Jorge González-Outeiriño; Charlisa R Daniels; B Lachele Foley; Robert J Woods
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Routine Microsecond Molecular Dynamics Simulations with AMBER on GPUs. 1. Generalized Born.

Authors:  Andreas W Götz; Mark J Williamson; Dong Xu; Duncan Poole; Scott Le Grand; Ross C Walker
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Predicting the Structures of Glycans, Glycoproteins, and Their Complexes.

Authors:  Robert J Woods
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Optimizing Solute-Solute Interactions in the GLYCAM06 and CHARMM36 Carbohydrate Force Fields Using Osmotic Pressure Measurements.

Authors:  Wesley K Lay; Mark S Miller; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Effect of microfibril twisting on theoretical powder diffraction patterns of cellulose Iβ

Authors:  Jodi A Hadden; Alfred D French; Robert J Woods
Journal:  Cellulose (Lond)       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.044

4.  Building an extensible cell wall.

Authors:  Daniel J Cosgrove
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.005

Review 5.  Curious Cases of the Enzymes.

Authors:  Nuriye Nuray Ulusu
Journal:  J Med Biochem       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Preferred crystallographic orientation of cellulose in plant primary cell walls.

Authors:  Dan Ye; Sintu Rongpipi; Sarah N Kiemle; William J Barnes; Arielle M Chaves; Chenhui Zhu; Victoria A Norman; Alexander Liebman-Peláez; Alexander Hexemer; Michael F Toney; Alison W Roberts; Charles T Anderson; Daniel J Cosgrove; Esther W Gomez; Enrique D Gomez
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Irregular and suppressed elastic deformation by a structural twist in cellulose nanofibre models.

Authors:  Kojiro Uetani; Takuya Uto; Nozomu Suzuki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.